Merry King Charles Stuart II: The Black King of England – Oguejiofo Annu
The word Stuart comes from the old nordish root Svart which means black. Stuart is the same word as Swarthy, which means black in old English.
There was once a Stuart line of Kings in England. The name of the founding ancestor was Stuart which means Black man.
In this post, we feature the original painting of one of the Stuart Kings of England and Scotland, King Charles II, also lovingly known as the “black boy” of England by his subjects.
He is commemorated in the celebrated name of the Black Boy Inn, found all over the British Isle.
King Charles II was a black man. Many of his surviving paintings falsely depict him as a so-called white man in clear contradiction to the famous description of the jolly King.
However, in the picture posted immediately below, one can see one of the contemporary paintings of King Charles Stuart II, Merry Black Boy of England. This picture invites all to decide why King Charles Stuart II, would have been called the black boy.
King Charles Stuart II 1630 – 1685
The eldest surviving son of Charles I and Henrietta Maria of France, daughter of Henry IV of France, the future Charles II was born on 29th May, 1630, at St. James Palace, London, the second child of the marriage, he replaced an elder brother, Charles James, who had died shortly after birth.
It was said that when Charles was born in 1630 he was nicknamed the Black Boy by his mother, Queen Henrietta Maria, because of his dark and swarthy appearance
In 1646, following political crisis, his father Charles I was overthrown by Oliver Cromwell and beheaded. Charles II had to flee for his life through Scotland and on to France after making a weak and symbolic attempt at regaining the Stuart title. Fate and reality had soon dawned on him. He settled into a life of penury in France.
Upon the death of Oliver Cromwell, Charles was recalled back to England by Cromwell’s legatee and son who had no interest in ruling England. Charles was restored back to the throne and his coronation took place at the traditional venue of Westminster Abbey on 23rd April, 1661.
The Merry Monarch as he was later to become known, is famous for his many mistresses. Although he had numerous children by his mistresses, the Queen, to her great sadness, remained barren.
Charles popularity with the people was solid. Despite the ravages of last great outbreak of the Bubonic Plague struck London in 1665, which claimed thousands of lives; and the great fire of London 1666 which completely destroyed the city, he was highly favoured by the people.
He died without an official heir on 6 February, 1685 after a brief illness and was succeeded by his brother, King James II. He was the most beloved of all the Kings in the line of the Stuarts.
Black King of England
According to the annals of the english monarch:
Charles’ appearance was anything but English, with his sensuous curling mouth, dark complexion, black hair and dark brown eyes, he much resembled his Italian maternal grandmother, Marie de Medici’s side of the family. During his escape after the Battle of Worcester, he was referred to as ‘a tall, black man’ in parliamentary wanted posters.
One of the nick-names he acquired was the black boy His height, at six feet two inches, probably inherited from his Danish paternal grandmother, Anne of Denmark, also set him apart from his contemporaries in a time when the average Englishman was far smaller than today.
English Pubs
All English pubs named the Black boy are named after Charles II due to the swarthy and dark colour of his complexion.
Modern European painters try to hide the racial identity of this jolly King by depicting such fantasy as is posted below:
Whitened King Charles
July 28, 2009
Sources
Black Boy Inn
Dear Friends,
Perhaps I should have broadcasted this engraving sooner because I see that only after seeing this people really seem to take notice.
I should point out that my research Blue Blood is Black Blood (1500-1789) shows that intermarriage was the cornerstone of this black and coloured European elite, the highest nobility. So with one identification of a European black noble or king we can identify a whole string as such. Even without a personal description we can recognize the artist’s intent to show dark skin as proof of blue blood.
Charles’ looks came from all his ancestors who were black or coloured, but he perhaps showed the true colour of night, which made people take notice. In this way he resembled The Moor, the image of a Classical African which symbolised blue blood in art. It seems that families would rejoice in the birth of such a child as proof that the bloodline was really blue, which was black. Both his grandmothers like Maria de Medici, Queen of France were of course black and Anne of Denmark’s portrait for The Masque of Blackness shows her true colour as pitch-black. Charles II shared blood ties with Elizabeth I, Louis XIV, King William III and Queen Anne. Not to mention his ennobled bastards as the Countess of Lichfield and Lord Monmouth.
They all belonged to ‘A fixed, mulatto nation with some looking more African, Asian or white but sharing a black identity called blue blood’ and were descendents of Blue Men, the original Europeans, the Africans who inhabited Europe 40000 years earlier. The whites came only 6000 years ago to Europe from Central Asia.
The fake, whitened, revisionist portraits of this black elite form the basis of white supremacy thinking. They were mostly conceived as propagandistic portraits to legitimise the rule over whites, who seem to have become a majority. The Enlightenment was a liberation ideology to free citizens from despotic rule by a cruel nobility. Scientific Racism, the invention of race and the hierarchy in race should therefore be seen and can be deconstructed as a consciously overwrought liberation ideology to free Europe from a cultured, but despotic and cruel class of oppressors. The hatred focused on the symbol of black superiority, The Moor, so all Africans were hated and today, still pay the price.
Blacks who are stuck in the victim-mode should take heart. Blacks are no victims and they should not be identified with slavery. Black Civilisation lasted 10.000 years, Blacks ruled Europe (1500-1789), started black slavery, which has less to do with colour then the love of money, but lost out and the nobility was abolished with the French Revolution (1789-1795). Nineteenth century racism, European nationalism and rampant colonialism are the fall out, as the dream of a united Europe came apart. Yet most of the elite after the revolution in the whole of Europe was still of colour but refrained from claiming superiority because of their phenotype now called ‘bad complexion.’ The term ‘breeding’ should refer to the conscious project of noble families to make white off-spring.
Egmond Codfried
I’m very interested in your work, but I have to point out that the whites of the eyes in this photo are not white.
@ Vicky Are you serious? What does have to do with anything. Why not grow the Fu$$ up and learn something…dumb ass.
Yep look at Queen Victoria’s son, King Edward the 7th, He had a swarthy complexion like Abraham LIncoln who was whitewashed to look way lighter than he actually was. Also QVictoria’s granddaughter, Princess Melita very dark complexion too. It seems like Edward’s son’s mom was picked to be whitest of white to get the Moor’s features out of the so-called Royal family.
No, you have to show better proof than this.
Images made in woodcuts – which mr Codfried refers to – often make people look darker than they really were. They only used two colors printing and tried to add definition to the faces by shading them. Add the poor quality printing in those days and you get darker faces.
Wake up Lisa! Come out of the clouds with your white husband. Wake the HECK UP! Reality is knocking on your door. You think b/c perhaps you’ve escaped from your so-called roots and have a taste at another way of living that things are not as they really are? Step back from what you THINK you know as you’ve been taught they are and realize- things are not what they seem. How deep does the rabbit hole go? It’s time to FREE YOUR MIND Neo.
To the description of Charles II as a tall black man. As a black woman living in a North European country (and married to a white man) I know that if white Europeans talk about a “black man” they mean someone with white skin and black hair. If they mean a man with black skin they still use the now forbidden words negro or nigger.
[quote]Lise Nangala says No, you have to show better proof than this.
Images made in woodcuts – which Mr. Codfried refers to – often make people look darker than they really were. They only used two colours printing and tried to add definition to the faces by shading them. Add the poor quality printing in those days and you get darker faces.[...] Lise Nangala says To the description of Charles II as a tall black man. As a black woman living in a North European country (and married to a white man) I know that if white Europeans talk about a “black man” they mean someone with white skin and black hair. If they mean a man with black skin they still use the now forbidden words negro or nigger.
[/quote]
They are not woodcuts, but engravings on copperplate. As you will notice as you study thousands of them, like I did; the lace of the collar and the cuffs still appears white. The latest b.s. I have heard was of a fungus which attacks the copperplate and so the face appears black. Yet this evil fungus attacks only the part which depicts human flesh: the hands and the faces, but never the lace or cloth. It’s a very dangerous fungus for knowing what part is a reflection of human flesh, it now about virtual images, and thus must be from outer space, no?.
These people always insist that black means black hair, but never give an example of this, as if they lived during the 17th century. My research also speaks about the many images of Moors in the western art and I have discovered that they are not real persons but symbols of blue blood. Blue blood symbolised by blacks = blue blood is black blood. They knew what blacks looked like and there was no need for any confusion on this head. Charles II Stuart was described as The Black boy, a tall black man and the swarthy Stuart. This leaves no room for any doubt. As they use a classical African to identify themselves, I cannot but conclude that their blackness was from Africa.
@ Lisa Now I can see why you have a white husband. You should be ashamed of yourself! How dare you say what came out of your mouth. Don’t you know those racist ass bastard in Europe know the difference between black and black boy. Do you honestly think a white man or for that matter a white woman wants to be called black? Take a reality pill and bring your dumb ass back down to earth.
Are you serious? Do you really think that that “black man” refers to a hair color? What part of the world do you live in again
My family are barbadian Dukes, I can tell you Charles l was a frequent visitor to Bardados
His son Charles ll was born there of a black woman. He was then given a birth certificate
from the spanish Royals who was very close to Charles l. When he returned to england he returned as a spanish king. England has never been comfortable with the line of kingship and their waywardness towards Kingship. Hence the line had to be controlled if not removed. Fair to say they have incoopreated the lines back together. Like Princes Diana’s who happens to be a decendant of one of Charles l illegitamate Sons. So all is fair in love and war lolxxx So the sephardic lines remains intact and continues to go from strength to strength !!!!!!!!
We are the “ORIGINAL PEOPLE”;DIRECT CREATION.
WE RULE THEM BUT THEY JUST CAN’T FACE UP TO THE TRUTH.
TRUTH HURTS.
EUROPEANS ARE STINKING LIARS.THEY ARE WANNA BE’S AND JEALOUS.
IT IS SO COOL TO BE AN AFRICAN.
A contemporary chapter on Pushkin’s lineage:
The Mountbattens;
Although most of the above history is related in discussions about Pushkin’s African ancestry, no works – at least those translated or written in English – have ever commented on the descendent of the great poet. And this, despite the fact that Joel Rogers in “Sex and Race” (a privately-published work which has turned into a cult classic) traced the line of one of Pushkin’s daughters into the Mountbatten branch of the British Royal family.
(Perhaps the fact that Pushkin’s daughter Natalie married a prince was too much for either the Bolsheviks or the West’s liberal intellectuals who saw in the proletariat sentiments which had on occasion been expressed by the national poet, a spiritual source of the Revolution. Even if it was a well-known fact that Pushkin sold the serfs he had inherited so that he could afford the pampered wife he wished to wed, standard Soviet doctrine was that he had been the first to dip his pen in red ink.)
Because she herself was not royal, Natalie Pushkin’s wedding to Prince Nicholas of Nassau in 1868 was officially designated a morganatic marriage. The term ‘morganatic’ is a hold-over from a stricter hierarchical time. This term of precedence became more familiar as an increasing number of European royalty towards the end of the last century were slowly forced to adjust to the social changes that had begun to affect the rest of the world. The morganatic title created for Natalie was Countess of Merenberg with the right to bear the title of Count or Countess of Merenberg by her children. A good indication of just how strict the old order had been can be seen from the fact that even though her husband was a prince of the House of Nassau, when it came time for her daughter in turn to wed, her marriage to a member of the Imperial Russian family was also declared a morganatic one. Although the wife of Grand Duke Mikhail, Sophia and the children she bore him were officially known as the Counts and the Countesses de Torby. (No matter how tempting to attribute it as an example of racism in high places, the fact that he was the offspring of a morganatic relationship was probably what prevented Sophia’s brother, George, from succeeding his uncle William as Grand Duke of Luxemburg. Faced with a choice between George, Count of Merenberg and the abrogation of the Sallic Law, which excluded females from the succession, the Luxemburg parliament chose the latter allowing Charlotte to claim the throne as Grand Duchess of Luxemburg.)
Interestingly enough, Sophia’s daughter, Nadjeda, on the other hand, married someone of exactly her own social standing. George Battenberg was the grandson of Queen Victoria (the name would not be changed to Mountbatten until the outbreak of World War II). However, he too was descended from a royal morganatic line. Battenberg was the principality bestowed on the Countess Julie Hauke and her children after her husband, the Prince of Hesse, had been reconciled with his father for having eloped with her.
On the day of Nadja’s wedding in the Chapel Royal at Buckingham Palace the majority of the stories covering the event hysterically pointed to Nadjedja’s African ancestry and snidely speculated about the probability of this branch of the Royal Family producing black babies. It should be pointed out, however, that the Times maintained both its integrity and its dignity. As was to be expected from a journal of such literary standards,the fact that the bride was a descendant of the great Russian poet was duely mentioned but what editorializing they did was instead centered on the morganatic backgrounds of both spouses.
With so many published memories and histories of the Mountbattens available today, it is disconcerting to find so few references to Nadja. As the Marchioness of Milford Haven, she was not only Prince Phillip’s aunt, she also was actually his stepmother during a period of his adolescence.. When his parents, the Prince and the Princess Andrew of Greece, were exiled at the beginning of the war, Prince Phillip was sent to the Mountbattens of Milford Haven since the Marquis was his mother’s elder brother. (Incidentally, his mother’s title, ‘The Princess Andrew of Greece,’ is an indication that hers too was a morganatic marriage like the others referred to above.
Just wait for more to come European suckers.
WE ARE AT WAR.
Duke Anthony–
what kind of shit are you smoking!!
I did not read the whole piece by WDC, but there seems to be an assimilated kind of Afrocentrism, especially where Whites dictate to Blacks who is Black and who White is. Like Blacks just lack this rare ability to judge and decide who is Black. They need the goddam slave master to point this out to them. It also has to do with funding and keeping your frigging job as a Black scientist. People who were lucky to travel to the South of Spain have discovered how close Africa is to Europe. Africans could have easily come to Europe to become the first Europeans, as they did. They did not magically become white, but Europe was flooded by whites from Central Asia. They were descendents from the albino’s who prudently left Africa, looking for a milder sun. Pushkin could not have been so black if his more recent Russian ancestors were not, Black: Black Europeans, Blue bloods, nobles. Don’t the people who constantly talk about Alexander Hannibal get disgusted by the same old, same old and yearn from new insights. Something to work with? That’s were Blue Blood is Black Blood (1500-1789) come in to bust us out of this white supremacy crap. There idea is that you have to produce a African ancestor to level an accusation of Blackness at some poor chaps door. Well if the ancestor came 43.000 years ago, how the hell are we going to prove that, know his name, and produce a portrait? The cornerstone of the nobility was intermarriage to preserve the colour, the mark of superiority to them. And yet it’s not about an individual’s personal shade of colour, but identity, their mentality. You cannot tell how somebody will move by the shade of Blackness. So we have to regard Blue Blood as a Black Identity. The Black Europeans took pride in their Blackness as a group. But they also had military prowess and scientific knowledge. With these two means they became a noble and royal elite. Nobody invited them into the royalty, the whole thing started with them. Many persons are described as brown or black, chimney sweeper etc, but are shown as whites in all of Europe’s lying museums. Those were the elite of a Reversed Apartheid, were only coloureds could benefit from learning and position. All persons of interest belonged to this ‘mixed mulatto race.’ Some members showing Classical African features, some did not, but could never be considered whites. The Moors in European art and heraldry symbolise blue blood. The Spanish, Muslim Moors are never encountered outside Spain. They are not the ancestors of these Christian Blacks. Carrying on about the Muslim Moors of Spain is another Eurocentric trick to get us in another trap, in order to turn Black’s attention away from the Black European kings.
Englands Queen Charlotte was also of African descent. Her son was King Charles Stuart. I placed a link below, which gives more information on her lines. I learned quite a bit about the history of England and Wales, after tracing my maternal lines to Britain. My female ancestors were Welsh, the original inhabitants of Britain. The Anglos and Normans came into Britain and waged war on the Welsh. The Welsh came from North Africa into Spain, and traversed Europe before settling in Britain. Unlike the Normans and Anglos, they were dark complexioned, with black wavy hair, and brown eyes. This is quite an interesting topic, and I will bring it up on my radio show, http:/blogtalkradio/Anita-Wills (Anita Talks Genealogy). Americas’ History is tinged with lies and racism, in order to continue the Manifest Destiny of Europeans. “If you tell a lie long enough it becomes the truth”, is the motto of those who colonized America.
Correct me if I’m wrong – But with regards to the name Stewart it is defined in Oguejiofo Annu’s dialogue as meaning black in a direct reference to stengthen some believe that King Charles II was black. Do I assume it is also believed that James VI of Scotland & I of England also named Stewart was black or indeed his grandfather James Stewart V and what of his mother Mary Queen of Scots was she also black. I thing the whole Idea belongs on a forthcoming series of “Fantasy Island”
As far as Im concerned the name Stewart or indeed Stuart derived from the “Steward of Scotland who married King Robert the Bruce’s sister Marjorie and hence the Stewart line began.
Or are you now going to say that “The Black Douglas” King Robert’s right hand man was also black!
I don’t think this black dynasty stops at just King James or a small section of pan-European royalty during and prior to this time, considering Europe was taken by storm of the Moors, who were indefinitely black people. Look up the etymology of Moor http://etymonline.com should help.
I know this will soon come to the point that modern-day Berbers are white, yes, -MODERN-day- berbers are white.
It is quite funny how hard it is for whites to grasp the fact that they did not mold the cultures of the entire world, how can whites mold Europe, the Middle-East, and Asia, when a small fraction of the world today (and most likely then) was white? I’m guessing whites just too much cunning (though they developed a writing system far later than most black cultures) and strength (though they are genetically less powerful) to be defeated by blacks, correct?
Your a racist. Pure and simple.
You Rob, are the real ignoramus racists, undiluted! Go read some good book before coming here to Rasta Livewire to make a fool of your brainless self!
Do you believe white people were created by an evil scientist?
I do not know to that extent. I know however that Red people like you came from the caves of central Asia.
Your tribes are recent immigrants to Europe (arriving between 2 BC to 1500 AD) when you consider that Africans have been in Europe since the beginning of time.
Google up the Silures of England and you will see that they the original inhabitants of England had dark skin and curly hair and probably came from South of Spain. When you are south of Spain, looking for those with curly hair and dark skin, do you look to West Asia, or do you look towards Africa?
Do you believe “red people” like me are genetically inferior?
No. Except when they start lying…
that sentence contradicts itself….
Also the Moors only took Spain – and then lost it. Admittedly they did some amazing things in Spain and have contributed to a very rich culture on that peninsular. But that doesn’t make the Spanish black. The arab’s took North Africa – so does that make all North Africans Arabs rather than black?
Wrong! The Muurs were in Europe before the Romans. The invasion from North Africa into Iberia in the 7th century AD was just one phase of the Muurs. Muurs were also in Italia, in Ireland, in England, in Germany, in Greece, in France, in Denmark, in Holland, in Norway and Sweden.
Boy, you need proper education. I thought you was a “master’s history student.” You are a liar…lol!
Was there moors in Norway? This is news to me, a norwegian.
Link to article?
You people are nuts. The hair is a wig! All the aristocracy wore long, curly wigs in the 17th century. Amd you need to look at the Royal lineage to really ascertain as to whether he was black or not, and it’s just impossible that he was.
King Charles 2 via his mother was a descendant of Francesco I de’ Medici who was a descendant of Alessandro de’ Medici, Duke of Florence -A black man. History has been white washed unfortunately hence your comments.
Alessandro de’ Medici wasn’t black. You can’t hinge your entire argument on assertions. Do you also believe that the Jews were black and that white people were created as part of an experiment that went wrong???
Rob, you are a clown and a joke not a history student. Alessandro de Medici was a black man. He was an Italian Muur!
Alessandro de Medici’s picture:
http://www.aaregistry.org/aareg_files/event_images/AlessandroDeMedici.gif
Alessandro de Medici:
“The birth of Alessandro de Medici in 1510 is celebrated on this date. He was a Black Italian ruler during the 16th century.
The son of a Black [Italian] woman named Simonetta da Collavechio and the 17-year-old Cardinal Giulio de Medici who later became Pope Clement VII. ”
See: http://www.aaregistry.org/historic_events/view/alessandro-de-medici-secret-no-more
Produce a published article from an official source from a legitimate website that has proper references and authors with Phd’s from reputable Universities and your argument might have some more weight.
Little Rob, you are arguing with authenticated pictures. It is only a fool who argues with pictures. Find me one source that says the wood cut image above is not Charles Stuart II.
If you have no clue of Charles Stuart II, the black boy then go study boy! Lol!
I just schooled you on Alessandro de Medici, schooled you on the red man called Eric the red, after doing all that, you are unable to make no other comment.
Then like a little spoilt brat, you change your main argument and ask for something else. We call that red herring in formal logic 201. Fallacy of argument.
You have been destroyed as a poser. My little “Master’s history student” my foot…lol!
Rob, google or go to the library and look at a picture of the painting of the Jews who were enslaved after the Pharoah who loved Joseph died. The original egyptians and hebrews (jews) were darker than hersheys chocolate. There is a painting of 30 white women who were brought to the Pharoah as slaves, but there were not many whites in that part of the world during that time period.
Lise Nangala, I’ll accept your odd rationale regarding woodcuttings. But what about the guy’s FEATURES???? Look at his nose for example!
Princess Diana was a direct descendent of Charles II, no sign of dark skin or hair in that quarter! Many of her family members had or have red hair just like the traditional Stuart kings i.e. James I of England.
Sarah , african people and people of color can create every color of hair, eye, and skin on the Planet. DNA is datable and the white professional have concluded that Eve had to have been a black woman. When whites started having babies with white, they got lighter and lighter because there were now two weaker gene specimens recreating a weaker person. This is why the world is only a 1/4 percent white people. Remember, Hitler was killing those mixed Jews because they knew that they came from the original Jews (Hebrews) who were black. Hitler was ethnically cleansing black( African) blood and genes from the land. The first Italians were black also. You could have found this information on youtube and google, done by DNA geneticist. The first Chinese were black, they checked the DNA of many Chinese men and all of them were traced to Africa.
Sarah
Isnt it the Inbreeding which people write about. i.e inbreeding by freemasaons /illuminati/ European royals?
This is unbelievable, if he was a black man why wouldn’t they have showed him as a black man instead of white. I believe they were trying to cover it up and were ashamed of having black people in their family and in the royal family, and he had children but I have looked everywhere and can’t find any picture’s or artifact’s of them. If anyone could tell me how to find pictures, I would be more than glad to hear it. THANKS!
Look up the ” Black Madonna ” known all over the world. They painted Mary as white but google the black madonna and then try to believe that all over the world, they are lying and made up that Mary, the mother of Jesus was black, just like the hebrews in Egypt. They mixed with lighter people also, and lighter mixed with lighter, hence, what you see today in Isreal but there are plenty of black Isreali who have been there for many, many years.
LOOK UP THE RENAISSANCE JUST A LITTLE DEEPER AND YOULL GET IT ie Michelangelo…ie the Roman Catholic Church …payment for white washing portraits …but alas it seems black folks aint the only ones that dont like to read
As a Masters History student studying in England I think this is complete rubbish. Your trying to make something out of nothing due to your own political and racial beliefs. If you all believe he really was black but that it was covered up by later rulers then surely there would be more sources on it from his numerous enemies. You have to remember that Charles II was the ruler during the Civil War and was therefore a focal point for Protestant discontent. If he was actually black then there would be heaps of sources from Protestants commenting on it. Obviously racism as we know it never existed then so there would be no denouncing him for being “black” but I’m sure it wouldn’t take much stretching of the protestant imagination to pick up on the fact that he looked different to the native population!
You have to detach yourselves from the present and see the world as it was then – not now…
Rob, you may be a History student, but you lack scholarship and a curious attitude most necessary for learning. Hence you look but do not see.
Was it the author of this article who nicknamed Charles Stuart II as the black boy? Was it not those his contemporaries who saw him and dealt with him on a daily basis?
Do you not realize that Stuart means Svarti or Swarthy, which means black?
Was it the author of this article who made the wood carving depicting Charles Stuart II as a black man?
Can you argue with a picture?
A picture is worth 10,000 useless uniformed uneducated noisy yapping. Only a foolish dog bark at the flying bird.
Jahdey
it’s sad to have a inferior mind set be true and honest for a change
I don’t understand how having a slightly dark complexion from his Italian blood and a nickname of “black boy” is enough to make him African!? Eric the Red wasn’t a Martian it was just a name, same here!
You display complete ignorance again.
Wherein the article did anyone make Charles Stuart an African? Are you reading the article or the panicky reaction of your own mind?
Eric the red was not a Martian. He was described as red because he was pink-red like a red neck.
For your information, the red race (pink people) changed their names to “white people” in 1778 and enacted it into law after the European riots of 1848. Before that you were know as the red men.
Now you know why Eric the red was called red.
You also know that Charles Stuart II was indeed a black man, a Moor.
For your information, Moors were ruling Europe for many centuries before the Red men appeared from the caves. The red men changed the name of the Moors to “Black men” to hide the identity of their masters.
The first King of Scotland was known as Fergus Mohr. Do you get the flow?
Is there no way I can talk directly to you. This is too slow…
More Moors in Scotland:
http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/pathways/blackhistory/early_times/moors.htm
Right lets confine out argument to this one feed.
I’m not going to argue about Charles II. All you have is a nickname and a picture. This man was at one point the most hated man in England. If he was indeed black and as you assert that this was later seen as something negative then it would have been picked up on by his enemies…
But Moors in England!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! EVIDENCE!
Dr Jose Pimeinta-Bey :
http://www.africaresource.com/rasta/sesostris-the-great-the-egyptian-hercules/the-history-of-the-moors-in-europe-part-1-dr-jose-pimienta-bey/
He is just sooo wrong! I’m not even going to try and rectify all his errors because there just isn’t the time. Lets take Mc for example. It means son! not Moor.. He asserts but does not provide evidence and the evidence he does provide is so weak and sparse that it would crack under any sort of prolongued questioning. He also tries to assert that Africans basically created the modern world – thus completely underminining the various influences from Europeans and Asians.
In fact his biggest weapon to try and seem like he is speaking the truth is by accusing white people of racism to justify his own racism.
At the end of the day, in the modern world it would not take much for an argument such as his to come to dominate if it were true. However, if I say that to you you will claim that it is true but that all white people are too racist to admit it to pretend the evidence isn’t there – therefore insinuating all white people are racist.
He does add little bits of truth into his work to give it an air of authenticity in much the same way a holocaust denier would. For example, it is true that the Moors did raid Ireland at times but this does not give any weight to his argument as a whole.
I want to make clear that by refuting this imposters ideas I am not being racist. Black people and black culture has had important cultural, political and social implications for us all – but I don’t feel the need to celebrate this fact by denouncing the contributions of other cultures.
If his arguments were indeed as real as he claims that it would not take much for him to become a leading academic in a top university such as Oxford. The fact remains that under scrutiny his arguments don’t work. Lies mixed with some truths that play on Africans who feel victimised by white people.
He isn’t too disimilar to the white extremists he denounces.
Bob, European albanoids lie too much. Just like you threw a fit when you were hit with the true image of Charles Stuart II the Black boy.
Now you throw a fit because Dr. Pimienta-Bey PH.D has destroyed your world. I thought you had wanted me to give you a PH.D work.
Next you want me to give you a star of the Oxford University academic circle. What would that do for you? Even if Pope Paul your European father were to get up from the grave and tell you that they had been lying to you all that time, you would also call him a liar.
You live in a world of fantasy and made-up history that is instantly destroyed once subjected to real analysis.
Welcome to Rasta Livewire, where we tell you the other half that the Albanoids have tried to hide!
The image that you showed was done on dark wood – that is why it is black! If you go on that then there are LOADS of English rulers who were black. I just chose to ignore that part of your argument.
I asked for verifiable sources. Your Dr does not provide anything tangible to look up he just asserts.
and by saying Europeans lie all the time you are the racist.
I would have absolutely no problem if some of the English Kings were black. As far as I know my great great Grandfather could have been black. Its not a matter of white or black it is the truth.
Lets look at the facts your fail to answer about Charles II.
-When do people try to cover up his “true identity”
-Why do his enemies not bring it up in their VAST amounts of writing on both the civil war and the glorious revolution.
-If he was loved by his people at the time why was there not further mention of the fact that he was partially Moorish?
I don’t have time for this any more. You are no better than white supremacists in my opinion. I now have 150 pages of articles related to Bernard Bailyn’s interpretation of the American War of Independence to sift through before you try telling me that King George, George Washington and John Adams were all black too….
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Y_Hap_EM-81.PNG
Thanks for the gene map. Now study the father of the Y-DNA “E” Haplogroup. He is known as “YAP”+. He was an African.
Y-DNA “E” Haplogroup is also a black African DNA.
E-M81 is also found among the Black Berbers of the Sahara desert, the Senegalese, the Gambians, the Malians and the Mauritanians, as well as Somalians, Sudanese, Ethiopians and Egyptians.
Since Europe was civilized by Africans, I hope you are beginning to see the significance of Hap E-M81.
I think the problem with our argument is that you pick on just one of many of my points and ignore the rest. Lets get back to basics.
If King Charles II was indeed of Moorish ancestry then why did his protestant openness during the civil war and the glorious revolution not make a point of it?
Greetings Bredren and Sistren..
Why must you slander INI with all this negative misguided misinformation?
Jah sees man by his actions and soul, not by his skin tone.
The fact is, all of mankind is rooted from Africa. period.
Iman can claim no ancestry except that is of the roots. Africa.
If you follow your inner I, that is the Almighty I, Jah creator HIMself, You will be granted the wisdom that skin color segregation is a product of wicked Babylon tactics. Furthermore, people of all races are exactly the same. The only thing that can be considered different between people is if they are wicked (faith in one’s self or earthly things) or Righteous (faith in Jah love, and respect). So don’t fall victim to Babylon misguidence, and learn to see others as yourself. That is all. Much Love
See I admire Bo for denouncing the racism preached by others on this site. He is right, it doesn’t matter what colour you are!
Although I do find the whole calling Babylon wicked a little unfair considering Babylon, forgive me if I am misinformed, basically means all of Western society.
It is possible to preach a message without denouncing that of others – a lesson Christians and Muslims should learn!
Your reading comprehension leaves me confused. Where in the article brings racism to your mind? You little red men are so guilt-stricken that anytime the Muur begins to self-realize himself, you turn up with your angst, anger, distractions and delusions. But note, that half the history has not been told, and we intend to tell it right here on Rasta Livewire. If you have problems with the truth, then you have problems with yourself. The truth is for everyone Muurish and Albanoid.
Jahdey
INI know that false history has been passed down through generations. It is good to teach the truth, and I comprehend the article fine. However, I point is that it does not matter if he was black or white, “Albino or Moorish.” Truly what difference does it make? Did his skin color decide how he ruled? Of course not!!
I people, we cannot move forward to unification unless we put skin color behind us. History is history. It is to be learned only so that we may not make the mistakes of our ancestors. So that we may look forward and purify the future.
Comprehend this:
Overstanding>Understanding
Bo
we can not move forward on lies, we are all apart of the human family, but truth is truth, we must no the truth in order to move on and not make the same mistakes. and rob if you’re true then you wouldn’t really have a open mind and do some research without having your mind already made up. i was raised up in christianity but due the fact of me having a open mind and reasearching i found the lies that was be told, and how the bible are egiptian and sumarian stories changed to make it seem as though it was another race of people this book was talking about when in fact they were black. when i look at documentries on the history channel of egipt, the reinactment usally have white or light actors, but when i look on the wall the picture show them my complexion or darker, and expecially when it’s pre-dyanastic period.
Babylon refers to wicked culture. Materialistic, Capitalistic, Cannibalistic trends. All of which began to multiply and spread like disease through Western Civilization. This by no means refers to every individual in the west, just those who live corrupted lives.
There is a direct correlation between Roman Babylon and Western society today.
Capitalistic trends,
Cannibalistic friends,
will surely bring Babylon
unto a fiery end.
See I agree with you Bo. The race does not matter. However, by asserting that a very distant relative was half Moorish I do not believe that that is enough to make him black. As I said before – by that logic a lot of Europeans are also Mongols descended from Ghengis Khan.As most of the English Kings were not English anyway I would have no problem if they had been black, chinese or Russian – but you can’t make assertions like that based on such little evidence and an assumption that pre-18th Century Englishmen were so inherantly racist that they would immediately seek to cover up Charles’s true identity.
I agree with you that Western society is riddled with many negative aspects. The West has grown at the expense of others, capitalism has led to increasing inequality and societies are plagued by obescity, laziness, promiscuity, crime ect… However, Western society has also created a standard of living and quality of life superior to anything that has existed before. It has given people individual choice and the ability to alter their circumstances.
if i were to take the native Americans as an example I can demonstrate the inhumanity that Western civilisation can unleash. However, it is not unique to Europe. The Mongols, African tribes, Aborigines, the Chinese, the Japanese, the native AMericans. All are guilty of equally as inhumane acts. The Chinese fought some of the largest battles seen, the Japanese had one of the most unfair cast systems around, the natives AMericans tortured and killed thousands for their Gods.
The point is that all that is eveil in the world is inherant in humanity. While certain aspects, such as capitalism, can be denounced as Western ideologies, capitalism has also benefitted society in many ways. The real evils of murder, crime, rape, lies ect…. These are the immoral persuits of individuals of every single race, nation and culture. I think your focus should be re-directed against the faults of humanity rather than using “Babylon” as a scapegoat.
However, at the same time I respect your views and the manner in which you deliver them.
Respect at last. Yes I
INI agree with you Rob. Good things can come and have come from all systems in which Righteous people stand. See the illusion goes, however, that wickedness outweighs positive culture in modern society. Though the standard of living may improve, does this mean the people are better off spiritually? And what is to come of these destructive wrecknoligical regressions or the exploitation of Mother Earth’s blood? INI can not say but can only act upon the positive laws of Rastafari, Haile Selassie I, the only KING that deserves to be praised for HIM teachings.
As always
Respect
Although I personally am not religious I agree 100% with your message. While we may disagree on history and religion I cannot disagree with you on what you have just said.
Your ultimate message is flawless.
LOL! Welcome to Rasta Livewire. Tout le monde sont ici .. the whole world is here. Now put aside your racialist anxieties and learn!
Jahdey
You have commented over and over again about how “red men” came from caves and lie all the time. You also say that Africa “civilised” Europe, insinuating the “red men” were incapable of it without Africa.
That is racism and no different from a 19th Century Englishman telling you of how white people civilised Africans, aborigines, native Americans and Asians. YOu are using the same racist argument but just turning it the other way round.
Why can you not acknowledge the greatness and weakness of all civilisations. Why is it that your little mind can’t comprehend Africa not being the centre of the universe. The Chinese, native Americans, Aboriginals and Europeans came up with ingenious civilised societies.
Next you will tell me that the Chinese did not invent gunpowder, that the English did not invent industry, that the natives did not have the most urbanised centres of the world (pre-colonial times) and that it was actually Africans who took Kangaroos to Australia!!!!
Tell me this. If Africa really is the centre of all civilisation and influenced all of European History. What went wrong? How did Europeans manage to overpower your medieval and ancient leaders to become the most powerful nation in the world. Why is it that the Chinese are on their way to becoming the new world super power while Africa can’t get out of civil war and poverty. Why is it that not a single respected historian agrees with you on any of your points.
The answers to all these answers are far too complex to even start telling you on here. But I can tell you now that none of them hinge on some sort of conspiracy in which the “red men” over threw their black superiors and managed to somehow overpower the most civised continent in the world (Africa) to dominate on a global scale.
All cultures, all races, all genders all civilisations are equal. Your arguments only lead to hate and violence.
Bob
Your questions are welcomed. They have all been raised before and answered on Rasta Livewire, and I invite to research the website and elevate your mind.
Truth does not need your “respected historians” to authenticate it.
You have been shown historical, genetic and cultural evidence of our claims. Your incredulity does not dilute them, it only increases their potency. Because when you search further some of the truths we have revealed to you on this site, you will be amazed at how ignorant the system has actually rendered you regarding the true state of reality. And then you will become truly learned.
On Rasta Livewire, you will learn that Africa is actually the only continent divided equally by the equator, the imaginary line which lies at the center of the globe. Africa is indeed literally at the center of the world.
Feel free to search the Rasta Livewire database and comment as your knowledge grows.
Welcome to Rasta Livewire, we shock and we burn up ignorance!
Charles II was called black boy because of his dark hair, it was a nickname. His image is dark because it was done on dark wood – like many English Kings, Princes and Lords (if you go to the Tower of London you can see some of them). The name Stewart derives from the political position of office similar to a governor, known as a steward – it does not mean black. And finally, Alessandro de’ Medici was not black. However, even if he was it would prove to be a drop in the ocean of European blood – by such an argument I could claim all of Europe is descended from almost any nation. Many Europeans can trace their genes back to Ghengis Khan – this does not make them Mongol.
All your arguments have been refuted with reason. Their are hundreds of primary sources on Charles II due to the Civil war and glorious revolution (not to mention the fact he was a King) – none of these sources claim Moorish ancestry or claim his complection was that of a black man.
I also believe that if he really did have black ancestry the British government would be on it like a car bonnet. Claiming past royals have African ancestry would work wonders for the “multiculturalism” that the government has been persuing ever since the 1950s.
Case Closed.
Haha… there were many English kings who were black. Many European Moorish kings that you would fall off your fantasy world and made-up “Oxford University” history tall tales.
So “Charles II was called black boy because of his black hair”.. lol! Ok and Edward the black prince, was called black supposedly because of his black armour, according to your Oxford historian liars? Do you know Fergus the Mohr, the first king of Scotland? Do you know Queen Charlotte wife of Goerge III? How about the first black Queen of England Queen Phillipa? Do you know the Medici family of Italy? Do you hear about the Stewarts, the Halliburtons, the MacDougals, of Scotland? They all have black ancestors.
Do you know that Dublin Ireland means Black city? Do you know that Lashbuna (Lisbon) in Portugal used to be a black city in the 14th century? Even the name comes from Moorish people. Do you understand that “Melanie” means little black girl, whereas “Fiona” means little white girl?
Do you realize that you reds came into Europe only in the 4th century AD, with the conquest of Rome by Alaric the Visigoth? Before then, you were central Asians. Before then, the old tribes of Europeans now nebulously called the Celts were Muurish, and dark brown peoples from Africa, Anatolia and Arabia. sometimes your historians call those old Europeans, “Indo-Europeans”. Indeed, the word Indo, from Indus, India, Indra, means black…you ever heard of the Indian ink, or the Indian marker?
Those Muurish Europeans ended up as the European elites for a very long time. They were your royalties and learned ones. The rest of you were serfs and slaves. In the feudal times 5% of Europe was armed royalty while 95% were serfs and slaves. The ratio has not changed even in the so-called modern times. You are really part of the mass of serfs and slaves.
So Bob, those like you, who have nothing in life, no history, no future, because the elites stole them away from you, now hold onto the only other thing you think you have, “Black phobia”… irrational fear and hatred of Muurish descendants. It has been called fear of “genetic extinction”, “racism”. It is virulent, but sometimes benign …yet racism nevertheless.
There you have some of the origins of your insecurity which seem to prevent you from accepting the true story. Either that or brainwashing in “Oxford University’s Masters’ Program in History”, or just sheer ignorance and hubris.
Welcome again to Rasta Livewire. Take your time to elevate your mind.
Firstly, your account of history is incorrect and on a par with nazi ideology.
Secondly it is you who is scared of the role of “red men”. You seek to deny “red people” any role in history or civilisation.
You are the extremist and the racist. You should open your mind and acknowledge the role of other cultures and other civilisations.
Welcome to the Truth.
Just a thought….
In order to grasp the truth, you must use your free will and freedom of thought. Do not let your mind get trapped within the so-called HIS Story. This is nothing more than a form of control that were created by the ruling elite long before you were born. In fact, you were born on three lies: science, religion, and history. Since you have been lied to about reality your entire life, any truthful revelations contracting your false worldview will indeed appear to be far-fetched. To make things even worse, human beings are stubborn creatures who let their egos override everything else. Instead of researching and learning about new information that does not fit within your current worldview, you would rather exercise your ego to override everything else. Have you heard of using the spirit of inquiry or even tapping the guru inside of you – - the search for greater truth beyond your false history, false religion and false science. This is the real seriousness of profound thinking.
Attempting to hold onto your existing worldview would not be a wise decision. So, either accept the truth now or continue to suffocate in ignorance and mental slavery.
Jahdey,
is white,arabs,asians and African born with the same father and mother,or ?and who is supirior than others,and firstborn?
Jahson
I do not know that anyone is superior to the other. I know we are human beings living on earth for millions of years, interbreeding and interliving. There musta been a time we all had one mother and father since we all are the same specie, human being.
Seen?
Jahdey
Religion, race, culture, politics its all the same a nightmare a never ending reason for conflict. If there is a all mighty up there which I believe all through human evolution in some form or other has been there means we ALL have the need to beleive in a higher being. The big Question is who is right? The real and only true FACT is nobody knows we only have our own inheritied beliefs to carry own. The real sad fact is I think we all agree there is only one true god (no matter what religeon) but unfortunately we cant all be on the winning side, most of us will be wrong? Me personally well I think god up above will be looking down at us ALL and thinking what a mess we have made of the whole thing as every religeon is a offshoot of another or has been modified by man to suit there own needs at that time. Basically if we are all really honest and follow our hearts we know deep down inside whats right and whats wrong, the problem with this is you have to have a good heart to start with no matter what religion you are.
May your god be with you
I can distictly remeber the first person that I ever saw that was different from me, I was only about seven or eight and a chinese resturaunt had just opened in our village. The thing is as a young boy I did not feel threatened or protective in fact the entire opposite , I was eager to interact and find out about them without any pre conceived ideas. Maybe this was the inocense of youth? What does that over used statement mean? To me it means a clean soul that has not been violated. A child has the unique abilty to connect with all cultures without pre concived ideas. For example if you get a room full of kids and toys from all the differnt cultures in the world and observe it will be no different from sicking kids from the same culture in a room. What I am saying it is only as we grow older and have external influenses put on us that make us different, conflict, distrust and eventually hate????
May your god be with you
I have just read the comments from the top of the page about royalty, race , culture and so on?? What is excactly royalty?, a strange man made creation? surely IF there were distinctions to be made upon mortals this would have been done by god himself. There is absolutely no indication in the past of any monarchy being chosen by any god, this would be a direct contradiction of the whole philosophy of a divine being. I am afraid we only have ourselves to blame on the so called royalty line, in the eyes of god we are all royal and for us as a culture to place any such people on a pedistle and proclaim them as “royal” is like saying someone is a witch and burning them, how do we know these things, answer we dont. In the eyes of god all Men (women) are equal no matter who you are.
My accusation to this website is that it does exactly what you denounce. It promotes racism. Just because the racism is Black against white, the subjugated against the dominant does not justify it. If you don’t think that the comments on this from people like Jahday are racist then take a quick look at some other articles. One of them reads that “white people are genetically inferior”.
The people on this site denounce racism while being racist themselves. They attack Eurocentrism while replacing it with afrocentrism. They use massive generalisations to justify what is essentially racism. What they argue is little different to the Nazi’s claiming superior Aryan blood and a dominant role in history through Atlantis.
Rob
Shut your trap-door! You lost an argument here already, and should be quitely studying your Muurish European history to update your knowledge about the reality of life. Quit the drinking the cool-aid fake European history you were grown on. Seek to comprehend the real truth, and you will be free.
Truth is for everyone, both so-called Blacks and so-called whytes.
Jahdey
Articles on here say “whites are genetically inferior”. That is a fact. You can’t dispute it and thus lose the argument. Unfortunately your afro-centrism clouds your judgement. You are blinded by your own ideology and fail to see the truth.
Stop whinning and STFU!
The article you are complaining about “whites are genetically inferior” was actually written by a team of pink-white (like yourself), Europeans scientists. But unlike you they are accredited scientists and accepted in their fields..
The in depth studies can be found at the article’s source, here:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,331949,00.html
Unlike you they are very educated and open minded. They accepted the truth and published it. Are those Europeans also racists?
Rasta Livewire just re-posted it and you are having a belly-ache? Again I ask you, are the European authors of that article racist Afrocentrics? Will you also shoot the messenger because you do not like the message?
Huussh! Shut your trap and go siddon in a corner and study some real Muurish history.
Welcome to Rasta Livewire.com!
Jahdey
I can give you a million articles claiming blacks are inferior. It doesn’t make it true…
Written by African or Afro-American scientists? Post them.
BTW: The article I posted for you is written by so-called white scientists. From Cornell University, an Ivy League University in the United States, and one of the best in the world.
The in depth studies can be found at the article’s source, here:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,331949,00.html
So you know better than them? Yet you cannot even manage to cope with the history of Europe. Interesting…
Also, as far as I am concerned I won the argument about Charles. None of your evidence was credible. But that doesn’t make a difference. Even if the world was once ruled by black people – your still a racist.
^And you are a pecker-wood!
An ashen, beaten, weakened pecker-wood!
Go quietly to a corner and read muur articles from Rasta Livewire to uplift your benighted mind.
A moor= An arab/North-African. Is an arab a black person?
Moor means black man. There was not yet born an Arab moor, save the black Arabs.
Dublin doesn’t mean black city, it means black river dubh lin…..
NO MAN IS SUPERIOR TO ANOTHER MAN!! ONLY JAH IS SUPERIOR TO MANKIND. IN FACT, WE ARE NOT “BLACK” OR WHITE” OR “YELLOW” OR “BROWN” OR “PINK” SO ON AND SO ON. THESE DESCRIPTIONS LIMIT OUR MINDS AND CORRUPT OUR SOULS. THE TRUTH IS THAT WE ARE ALL SHADES OF THE SAME COLOR AND MEMBERS OF THE SAME RACE (HUEMANS= HUMANS OF DIFFERENT HUES). THE TRUTH CANNOT BE FOUND IN HISTORICAL DOCUMENTS. HISTORY IS A PRODUCT OF MAN. HISTORY CANNOT BE CONSIDERED FACT OR THE TRUTH BECAUSE IT COMES FROM HUMANS. ONE MUST ONLY STUDY HISTORY TO LEARN, NOT TO FIND TRUTH. TRUTH CAN BE OBSERVED ONLY BY STRENGTHENING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN I AND I. LOOK WITHIN YOURSELF FOR THE TRUTH. FOR THE MAN WHO LEANS PON HIS OWN UNDERSTANDING WILL ALWAYS BE SEARCHING FOR THE TRUTH. THE TRUTH IS REVEALED TO THE MAN WHO ACCEPTS HIS IGNORANCE AND RELIES UPON THE OVERSTANDING OF JAH CREATOR. YES I BLESS I EVERY TIME. MUCH LOVE TO THE HUEMAN RACE.
(sigh!) What a load of… “The word Stuart comes from the old nordish root Svart which means black. Stuart is the same word as Swarthy, which means black in old English.”
No, the name Stuart comes from Steward, the position a junior member of the Fitzallan family held when they came north from England into Scotland. They became the King of Scotland’s hereditary ‘steward’ or the person who arranged the king’s events. The Fitzallans inherited the throne of Scotland when Walter Fitzallan “the Steward” married Marjorie Bruce the only daughter of Robert I who died without a male heir. It had nothing to do with their coloring as it is a known fact that most of the Stuarts had red hair from their Breton forebears.
Charles II was known as the “black boy” because he was very swarthy and dark haired. This was no doubt inherited from his mother Henriette de Bourbon who was half Medici (Italian) and half French. As his family was from the border area of Spain there might have been Moorish blood in the family.
Seriously, if you go back far enough, we are all from Africa.
And if you go to stonehenge today. They are digging up our ancestors (black).
Go there today. DNA has proved that the royal mummies dug up are actually black people.
So if you go back before BC you will know that Blacks/Afrikans used to live in Europe, China, South America etc
Link on the stonehenge thingy?
Because I have some real trouble believing this.
This is seriously the craziest conspiracy theory I’ve ever read.
It’s sad what happened with the black people in the course of history, but you can’t rewrite history..
nemithe
stop being lazy you are on the net.
http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/read/GEN-MEDIEVAL/2008-05/1212157970
and
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2007/01/070130-stonehenge.html
SEE THE TRICK HES PLAYING WIT THAT N NEGRO INDUSTRY 14TH AMENDMENT AFTER 13 BLACK ,FAKE WHITE CARRIONS FIRST IS THE BLEAC PEOPLE FROM MIDDLE ENGLISH THAT ARE RED RUDDY AMAZON TURKS WHO CLAIM IN AMERICA TO BE WHITE IN HE 13 14TH AMENDMENT,,FIRST BLEAC PEOPLE ,,THE THEY CALL DARK MUURS BLACK AFTER THAT AN NEGRO FROM DEAD NECRO , THERE TIME IS UP ,DONT LISTEN TO NONE OF THE ALBIONS WHO ARE STRAWMEN CAUSE THEY DONT EVEN KNOW THEY ALL CAPITAL NAME MEANS THEY A DEAD IT ,,LIKE COUSIN IT ON ADDAMS FAMILY ,THE EMOTINALLY BUT MISTAKENLY BE LIE VE THEY ARE WHITE BUT THEY ARE NOT,ONLY IN ARTIFICIAL COLOR OF LAW FROM AMENDED CONSTITUTUTION STOLEN FROM THE MUURS ,EXPECT NO INTELLIGENCE FROM THE DEAD ,WHO BRANDED PEOPLE NEGRO THEN GANGERINE BLACK IN LAW TO HIDE THEY ARE GRAFTED FROM THE TROGLYDYTE CHIMPANZEE MONKEY IN YUCATAN ,ALL THOSE ALBIONS WHO CALL BLACK SPEAK OUT THE BLACK OF THE CRACK OF THE ASS WHEN THEY CALL COLORS THEY HIDE THE FAKE WHITE STATUS THEY CLAIM THATS NOT FREE WHITE SOVETEIGN ,,M,ONCE AGAIN LET US TALK ABOUT HOW YOU ARE NOT ANY TYPE OF WHITE MAN IF YOU PAY TAXES TO ANYONE ,,NOBLES ARE NOT TAXED BUT COLLECT TAXES ,,,PEOPLE ARE PAID TO MAINTAIN COLOR OF LAW AN DISREPECT THE CHEM/KEM MYSTERY THEY COME FROM ,AN HIDE IT IN FREE MASONRY OF ALBIOMN LODGES ,THE BLACK MATTER INSIDE YOUR BODY IS WHAT WE GAVE YU TO BE ABLE TO REPRODUCE TO ONLY GOD WHO CREATED YOU WAS THE GRAFTING SCIENTISTS ,ALL OF YOU ALBIONS WHO COME FROM A WOMB ARE BLACK NO MATTER HOW PALE YOU ARE,, NONE OF YU ARE FREE WHITE SOVEREIGNS BEING SUBJECTS SO YOU CLAIM KKK WHITE ANN YOU NOT IN THE KKK ,IF YOUR NOT WHITE HOW CAN YOU CALL WHATS BLACK ,,BY LOOKING ,,YOUR SKIN DONT MAKE YU WHITE ,WHAT MAKES THE ARAB BEFORE EURO CAUCUS MOUNTAIN ,,,,,,,,,, TURKEY HYKSOS TYPES INVADING THEN OTTOMAN MUSLIMS ALSO INVADING SOUTH OR NORTH AFRICA /AKEBULAN ,WE ARE MUURS, YOU BOUGHT OUT THE CRAYON BOX TO MAKE LAWS TO STEAL LAND.YOU MADE ADJECTIVES INTO NOUNS ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, BLACK MAN TO SAY YU CAME FIRST ON PLANET IN YOUR BIBL;E WHICH YU USED FOR HIZZZZZZZSTORY AFTER YOU GOT SELLOUT NEGROES TO PUSH THAT SHT ON THEIR OWN PEOPLE LIKE CRACK,,MY PEOPLE SHOULD KNOW BETTER THAN TO SMOKE ANYTHING THATS THE COLOR WHITE LIKE CIGARETTES ARE WHITE ,,THE BOX IS THE COFFIN BODIES ARE CIGARETTES CIGARETTES MAKE YOU COUGH ,,IN ,,COFFIN ,,,,,,,,THE CRAZIEST CONSIRACY THEORY IS THAT THESE PEOPLE WE CREATED ARE NOBLE WHITE AN US ARE GANGERINE BLACK IIN THE EYES O THE LAW LLOUISIANA BLACK CODS TENNESEE BLACK CODES AN OTHER STATES ARE THE CRAZIEST CONSPIRACY TO LIE TO US TO TAKE OUR LAAND AN TO SAY WE ONY TRAVELED OUT OF AFRICA AS SLAVES FOR THE BLEAC ENGLISH CARRIONS IS A GREATER CONSPIRACY ,,, WE HAVE LEFT YOU WITH NOTHING TO HOL;D ON TO BUT THE FAKE COLOR YOU CREATED THAT IS AS DRIED UP AN LIMP AN AN OVERMASTURBATED CARRION CAGOT PENIS,THATS WHAT ALBIOS DO WITH COLOR OF LAW AN BL;ACK TO GET ENERGY EACH DAY LIKE THIS ONE HERE ,GOTTA CALL SOMEONE BLACK AT LEAT ONCE A DAY TO FEEL WHITE ,,WELL YOU NOT WHITE ,,TELL THEM TO SPELL THERE MUTHERS VAGINA BACKWARDS A NIGA V IS WHERE WE ALL FROM WHERE WE ALL CAME TO BE EXCEPT THOSE GRAFTED BY WE IN THE YUCATAN VALLEY ,,IIS IT WHITE INSIDE THE EARS NOSE MOUTH MEN HAAVE 5 BLACK HOLES WOMAN 6 ,,DID THE CREATOR CREATE SKIN FIRTST THEN FLESH THEN BONES ,,NO CELLS ARE FIRST CONSTRUCTION OF CELLS IN THE WOMB ,, HES A MESSED UP MAN BUT KING JAMES AND THIS OTHER STEWART WERE MUURS AN THEY LIED ABOUT THAT,THEM BEING RED RUDDY ,ONLY THE HEBREW ISRAELITES YOU SEE IN STREET DISSIN ALBIONS TOLD THE PEOPLE KING JAMES WAS A MUUR,,,,,,,,,,,,,, CONSCIUS COMMUNITY OF 125 STREET FOUND HIM TO BE A BAD MAN
Man there’s a lot of racist black people on here, I knew you guys were bitter!. Classic!. So this is where you come to vent some steam!. Go for it! “Bad Whitey” and all that!.
Lets face it guys, you’re smart compared to a lot of black people, you’re computer literate and interested in history, some are clearly interested in twisting it, but if that suits you then fine!. Most people here even bother to reason things without typing in “ghetto speak”.
Now lets look at why you bitter guys are so angry!.
Firstly you resent the fact your ancestors were treated like animals, dragged from their land and sold like livestock. Fair enough!, now let it go, remember the ancestors of the white guys who did that voted for Obama.
Secondly, being as you’re smart black people you look around at all the dumb black people out there who seem to willingly confirm all the negative stereotypes out there and you want to blame someone for their stupidity rather than be associated with it via your race and DNA., instead of looking at the morons who make you all look stupid you want to blame someone else. Fair enough!.
I see people frantically posting links explaining how white people are genetically inferior and this has been confirmed by scientists, who did an in depth research program with 20 white people and 20 black people!. Fair enough!. Just remember that scientists also confirmed black people have 5 cubic inches less brain mass than white people with a drop in 15 IQ points. http://www.news-medical.net/news/2005/04/26/9530.aspx
Fourthly remember that Dave Chappelle is f**king hilarious.
Don’t believe the white man is trying to keep you down, if “he” wanted to do that you’d all be dead, not running the country.
WORD.
Dave
1. You are not white, but pink or pinkish-yellow in colour, so drop your mythology of “white man this and white man that”.
2. By your sound, it appears you have very limited knowledge of history, economics and politics. You sound like a fantasy crazied pink boy, glorifying in his imagined god-like powers, and condescendingly addressing the “others” not so privileged. But that is your fantasy. In reality, you are just another pink boy descendant of some nameless illiterate European serf, who was brutalized for centuries and finally brought to North America to help the looting of black people and the resources. Who was your grandfather? What was his station in life in Europe? What is your station in this present life?
3. The scientist who spoke about black inferiority were white scientists not black scientists. We wait the day a black scientist will discover that blacks are inferior.
4. Pink-White scientists on the other hand have declared that pink-white people are genetically inferior to black people. Why does that piss you off? Why not get mad at your pink-white more educated brothers who have decided to wash the family linen in public? Why shoot the messenger?
5. Dave, you accuse the messenger of giving you offence because like most self-indulgent pink people, you are a racist, an unrepentant racist, and you will go down with all of your racist hateful types in this new dispensation that brings us an earth full of wisdom and overstanding.
Jahdey
my sword is drawn warning metaphysical black attack alert first of all i would like to thank dave for creating the enerygy of what im about to share with you,an brother ja dey for the battle field tenches we stay in for this fight the world war of 360 degree knowledge vs ignorance without military weapons,,,only toungue thought an type if there only venting why are you here ,,theres ality here before the re exposing lies bout you an me lets face it dave if red ruddy couldnt lie an say they were white then people wouldnt have to defend that lie they are black in america , if they didnt lie an say all the muurs who raised red ruddy amazon turks into humanity were white in skin an llie giving people a forced religion saying adam an eve were red ruddy first in creation an negros from ham ,if t wasnt a us an them but on us te muurs created then color wouldnt matter ,, those who made it matter threw the first pitch and hit the peope forced to be the black batters by the bleac .pale clear ,,,albion caucasions from england today kkk in america ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, are the pitchers of this ideology like cricket /baseball ,again the word black wouldnt be needed if not for the cliam of fake white ,,its used to put back in place what you stole n re placed with invention of fake white race re placed is a key word,adding 500 yeas on gregorian callender of course its yyour history any body can write a story an thats what the european sons did,,with lead sellout preacher/ politician t negro help ,,,to throw off balance in consciousnees ,,,,,,,,, lying ass mf are they ,shall i sugar coat n cipher thy raped my muther to from europa on down ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, you cannot attack the reaction if your the feature attraction,,you cannot attack the effect after you are the cause,it starts at childhood when the church or parents say either those are human beings or those are black people when a child asks ,what are they . they do not tel; their children those are the people that raised an civilized us an thats why we wear their fezzzes they gave us as permission to rule after their muthers gave it to them now you take that light into the secret dark york right scottish right temple an sit on it .you call muurs black cause its a secret they civilized you like black ops but tell them it their skin color creating noun from adjectives,english is witch craft an perfect english is slavery ,cause words are being used with dual triple even octagonal meanings then the etymology is different then all the definitions .then you pay people from church to lead the cattle over the clifff,,,,you tell them to promote jesus an color law as a way of life .you made white alive an black dead an when thy brand muurs a i living breathing people dead negro from necro ,,, enslavve them an 400 years later they still breathing the reaction cannot be blamed for the cause ,this what yu ask for this is what you get when you croosss the muurs in america in 1776 aafter we died first in revolutionary war an you bastartrd ass york right mf forgot who your fathers were through zion and wouldnt accept us into our own lodge we gave you,then instead of naming crispus attucks first muur to di fighting for your fake whiite freedom you say he is a negro , former slave like you said of ben banneker who you denied entry into york right thats why prince hall masons are in scottish rite today an still are under the crown of england who they fought fo against colonies of york right masonry , instead of naming john hanson a muur you say hes white an put a false picture of him up when he looked like queen charlotte o england so there was a time in 1770`ss when the queen charlotte an president john hanson were in charge an no one was negro but they skin color in nobility didnt matter an the historians lied said they were white until there real pictures/paintings were shown they were muurs ,,,you could have dark hue an be white in those days ann you lying albions an lead blacks who are zionistic jesuit brothers know it refuse to show it cause it busts up, your bullsht witchcraft spells race with no pace who the fuck is running buut us from the gun ,,the noose ,,the police ,,,,,,,,,,,the church an zion created all this an infiltrated it through both european masonic lodges high levels like bilderberg , an the dragon court re placed from egypt into europe today ,checkkk nicholas de vere-dragon court on search ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,look muur at what what we did to civilize you an raise yu to war opour fez then what u did to hide who gave it to you ,,it where you get the tassles on yor squae aduation hats from your german prusian system schools yu set up tpo give the people 1,2,or 3 degrees an thy think they got knowledge when theres 362 muur ,the ilusion of whats right an right is the only ist in the created race after the crestors of the fake aryan wwhhite race were civilized an thy put us the muurs they fathers out of our ple branding us nego monority children they creatd with ann o anytoing that ends in o not a is created by a man ,,an in this case like frankenstien man recreatd man an made the penis phllus god th new master plan to replace the muthers str we are supposed to be the suns of god of the creato are we but you war my fez as if you wee me comfortably an dont want to show who granted it to you an the real reason why an who civiized who ,thats not venting thats commenting upon the noble power status you been renting an using fake white to justify it when thats not how you got power we gave it you u don remember that ? we dont need to overhthrow what we set up an had to teach you to run ,,,,,,,,,,,, teach that in your grade school not only to your masonic initiates who can afford the higher degrees ,hard for a poor albion mason to make 32 hadrer for33 at least a millionaire you need to be or half ,,any way your renters tenants ,, an your lease is up so you gotta move cause our position will now be occupied by us ,thank you son for maintaining it from when you was the bleac peole in england ,,we the muurs civilized the bleac people an the bleac people created an uncivilized the negro in america with color of law black n fake wight from whiggamoor party ,,people had no white status until 1863 ,,free white soveteign does not man any race caucasion or aryan,,,,,,,,,,,,,, blacks law dictionaryty 4th edition – also stane;ly lane pool on negro an muur ,we are not initiatted into the white race thy stole the status after we gave it them as monarchs marrying them into nobility ,,poole however was one of the only authors at the time to defend the muurs an say they werent red ruddy like him in origin book- the muurs in spain,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, the muurs after spain 1870`s book by poole .
free white sovereign in law also would be any one from akeblan from akebulan an thats what my brother from zimbobwe told me he was on his land ,europeans are not white just cause they skin is pale in akebulan or america ,,it the law muurs are free white sovereigns until you tkke their land an call them negroes or take them from ther land to another ffor slabvery or in our cas enslaves on our own land an say you bought us from the east in 1500s on slave ship jesus,i n america today you have to agree to be a color by signing birth certificate at hospital an checking race on aplications for your trust fund being taking over.. when you give social security your tust fund is in back bottom left tht maatches all dollar bills , a red letter a-l with 8 numbers red mean private in banking
Afrocentrics are just complete idiots, you people are a joke. If he was black then all the monarchs were black – they were all inter-related – but that is clearly not the case. Your “proof” is a nickname and a print done in black ink, you are damn retards LOL! The Stuarts were heavily involved in the slave trade, only a complete retard would claim they were black.
Dave you are retarded, if you think the image of Charles Stuart which was done in woodcut is a black ink print. Boy, some of you spoilt albinos kids are deluded or you have advanced macular degeneration. How can you look at a black man’s picture and claim otherwise. Is this the first time you are hearing about the black blood in the royal families of Europe. Well, welcome to Rasta Livewire, where ignoramuses like you run into the half that was hidden from them. Oh, by the way, slave traders sold both black and white slaves, and still do so even today. You need to update your knowledge.
http://www.africaresource.com/rasta/sesostris-the-great-the-egyptian-hercules/the-hidden-muurish-royalties-of-old-europe-louis-xiv-edited-by-ironlion/
Jahdey
Dave,
Here is something you should read and if know anyone else who think like you, please pass it on. It has been posted before on Rasta Livewire. However, if you missed it, please read:
Accept the truth now or continue to suffocate in ignorance and mental slavery.
In order to grasp the truth, you must use your free will and freedom of thought. Do not let your mind get trapped within the religious or scientific paradigms. Religion and science are simply forms of control that were created by the ruling elite long before you were born. And thus, it is a shame that after being born on this planet, you were raised on either of those two lies.
Naturally, since you have been lied to about reality your entire life, any truthful revelations contradicting your false worldview may indeed appear to be far-fetched. But, to make things even worse, human beings are stubborn creatures who let their egos override everything else: Instead of learning about new information that does not fit within your current worldview, you would rather exercise your ego by letting others know what is and is not possible, merely based upon your personal knowledge and feeble understanding of what actually exists.
“The spirit of inquiry, the search for greater truth beyond religion and science, the profound seriousness of doing real thinking, philosophy and ontology – these are almost totally lacking in humanity. Humanity is therefore subhuman from lack of genuine intelligence….they automatically reject any emergent facts or realities that do not fit their brain dead cognitive pattern of belief and disbelief. They watch too much television” (Gabriel Chiron, “Truth is Greater Than Man”).
Warning: Upon arriving at this website, you most likely have the strong, instinctual urge to automatically defend your current belief system and to reject all of this information. But, realize that attempting to use your belief system to filter out this information is, in fact, a nonsensical paradox, because it is your very belief system that is at issue here. Thus, instead of using a belief system to do your thinking for you, think for yourself via using your own brain (hopefully, you have one).
“All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.”
—Arthur Schopenhauer (German philosopher, 1788-1860)
The truth hurts and this is why you are here trying to adjust to a truth that does not fit into your deceitful system which has nourish you in the womb of Caucasian colonial mind-frame.
I bet you think Greenland is really the size its portrayed on a map knowing that the square miles of this country proves the maps to be wrong. We are African-Center, and there is nothing wrong with that because we back up our truth with evidence which is hard to refute. Notice that you are having a hard time to academically refute it.
A totally incorrect article. The House of Stuart or Stewart comes from the word Steward. The only relation to black could be their initial hair colour which is related to the Celtic and Gallic Brittains and Normans they descended from. To suggest they were of Congoloid descent is just absurd.
Khalsa, you are incorrect,
_
_
There is another old word used by the Anglo-Saxons to denote black or brown-black the word sweart. The personal names Suart and Sueart may have been derived from this word, and may have originally denoted people of a dark-brown or bLACK COMPLEXION. Some names of this kind are mentioned in the Domesday record of Buckinghamshire and Lincolnshire.
SOURCE: Origin of the Anglo-Saxon race : a study of the settlement of England and the tribal origin of the Old English people(1906) by Thomas William Shore
The modern Germanic words for black are schwarz, svart, swart, zwart, sort and the old english word is sweart…..which all refer to the color black. A black person is called a niger, negro, negra, etc. If your surname is Swart (like in south Africa) then your descendent could have been a blacksmith.
So Stuart is not black and no German word for black has this T.
Furthermore the Norman nobility spoke French and old-english was not used in thsi time.
There is no possibility that this Norman king of england could have been a congoloid. That is the error in this article.
Khalsa, do the name Schwarzenegger (Schwarz as a nigger) speaks to you ?