Blue Blood is Black Blood 1500-1789

Blue Blood is Black Blood - By - Egmond Codfried

During the Middle Ages Black peoples in Europe were called Blue men. There seem to be images of this period which show Bleu people. I know of a Renaissance crucifixion scene with a light blue Jesus. In the Renaissance we start seeing many, many images of blacks, called The Moor.

Mike Nassau writes about Nubians and Iranians which were brought to Europe in 50 BC by Caesar to fight the Germanic nations. They stayed on and had their own communities along the Rhine and the Danube. Nassau states that in the 17th century Europeans arrived in America who were called Black Dutch. They were not treated like the Africans who were held in slavery. Many Whites were also kept as slaves or slave like conditions. Later on Black and coloured families claimed descend from these Black Dutch to prevent re-enslavement or being treated as ‘niggers.’ The point is that somehow Black and coloured people were present in Europe and managed to keep their Black looks through intermarriage till at least the 17 century.

On forums like these there is a lot of discussion about the Moors and what they looked like. I suggest we look at the Moor in European Art and take it from there. In European Art the Moor is always a Classical African: pitch black, frizzled hair, a flat and wide face, flat nosed, thick lips, and subnasal prognasty. When you study the symbol of the Moor from The Renaissance (1500) you will find that it did not start out like a ‘Black Servant’ or a ‘Black Page.’ The Drake Jewel (1575) shows the profile of a Black King dominating the profile of a White woman. This symbolises Africa dominating Europe and Black superiority in Europe. The symbol of the Moor shows a ‘Blue man’ which is a Black man and means Blue Blood. We see many portraits of the nobility in which they pose very intimate with a little Black boy or girl which gives the sitter riches, mostly pearls which seem to symbolise Europe.The nobility was coloured, and some showed more African or Asian or White treats. These portraits are kept hidden or are destroyed around the French Revolution (1789).

Inside The Drake Jewel is a miniature of Queen Elizabeth I. Her father’s sister Mary Tudor was the grandmother of Mary of Scots. Mary of Scots’ son was James I who married Anne of Denmark. They were the grandparents of Charles II Stuart who was named ‘The Black Boy.’ He was described on a wanted poster issued by parliament as ‘a tall Black man’ and I do not think they were fooling around. Anne of Denmark had ordered a play ‘The Masque of Blackness’ (1605) in praise of Black beauty which did not fade. The play was performed by members of the court and it explained how Blacks, The Sun People, came to Europe to look for a milder sun. In the play was a personage of The Niger River. The costume design shows a tall Black woman. Strange as this might sound; it took me after all three years to believe my own findings: Anne of Denmark which we know as a blindingly blond woman was almost certainly Black. As the whole Stuart dynasty was Black of skin.

When one looks for portraits of Charles II Stuart ‘The Black Boy’ one finds many which show a White man, with long black hair and mustachio. But if one persists there are portraits which show black skin. Especially the National Portrait Gallery site shows many portraits of a Black skinned boy and later a Black adult. Still there is a lot of variations, but I have one pitch black portrait which show his classical African treats under a huge afro-like wig.

So there were Black Kings in Europe, who somehow traced their origins in Africa and symbolised their Blue blood with the image of a Moor. The portraits which show Blacks as White’s I would explain as propaganda to make them look as the White people they so despotically oppressed. Other white portraits are over painted authentic Black portraits, or whitened copies of these or outright fakes. All European museums show portraits of the European elite, with fake white skin colour. We know that all the European royal families were blood relatives. The Black Boy’s mother, for instance, Henrietta Maria, was the daughter of Maria de Medici, Queen of France and the aunt of Louis XIV, The Sun King. The sister of The Black boy was Maria Henrietta Stuart who married the Dutch Stadholder William II. Their son was King Stadholder William III, who ruled Britain as William and Mary.

(All this can be verified in google)

3 Responses to “Blue Blood is Black Blood 1500-1789”

  1. Frances Says:

    Oh my! How fascinating,enlightening!
    What do you think, was it jealousy or fear of the black skin?

  2. Mats Says:

    The Masque of Blackness seems pretty racist to me, as it was followed up by The Masque of Beauty where the Africans had been “cured” for their blackness. Atleast thats what Wikipedia says, but thats not really a good source.

  3. Egmond Codfried Says:

    This is still a work in progress and I believe to have found the source of racism today. Europe was dominated and despotically oppressed by a Black and Coloured race which claimed Blue Blood (1500-1789). The fear of this happening again made Europeans revise history and go and oppress Blacks and Coloureds worldwide. A Barack Obama, presidential candidate, could not be possible in Europe today. Some European museum curators seem to know of this past, as they knowingly hide Black portraits and show white fakes or over paintings. Most White’s are just indoctrinated and victims in a way. But the personal descriptions are clear: they were not White looking and they sat on thrones all over Europe. White supremacy is based on fake portraits of Black and Coloured European Kings.

    Egmond Codfried

Leave a Reply