Blue Blood is Black Blood 1500-1789 – Egmond Codfried

Blue Blood is Black Blood – By – Egmond Codfried

During the Middle Ages Black peoples in Europe were called Blue men. There seem to be images of this period which show Bleu people. I know of a Renaissance crucifixion scene with a light blue Jesus. In the Renaissance we start seeing many, many images of blacks, called The Moor.

Mike Nassau writes about Nubians and Iranians which were brought to Europe in 50 BC by Caesar to fight the Germanic nations. They stayed on and had their own communities along the Rhine and the Danube. Nassau states that in the 17th century Europeans arrived in America who were called Black Dutch. They were not treated like the Africans who were held in slavery. Many Whites were also kept as slaves or slave like conditions. Later on Black and coloured families claimed descend from these Black Dutch to prevent re-enslavement or being treated as niggers. The point is that somehow Black and coloured people were present in Europe and managed to keep their Black looks through intermarriage till at least the 17 century.

I suggest we look at the Moor in European Art and take it from there. In European Art the Moor is always a Classical African: pitch black, frizzled hair, a flat and wide face, flat nosed, thick lips, and subnasal prognasty.

When you study the symbol of the Moor from The Renaissance (1500) you will find that it did not start out like a Black Servant or a Black Page. The Drake Jewel (1575) shows the profile of a Black King dominating the profile of a White woman. This symbolises Africa dominating Europe and Black superiority in Europe.

The symbol of the Moor shows a Blue man which is a Black man and means Blue Blood. We see many portraits of the nobility in which they pose very intimate with a little Black boy or girl which gives the sitter riches, mostly pearls which seem to symbolise Europe.The nobility was coloured, and some showed more African or Asian or White treats. These portraits are kept hidden or are destroyed around the French Revolution (1789).

Inside The Drake Jewel is a miniature of Queen Elizabeth I. Her father’s sister Mary Tudor was the grandmother of Mary of Scots. Mary of Scots son was James I who married Anne of Denmark. They were the grandparents of Charles II Stuart who was named “The Black Boy.”

He was described on a wanted poster issued by parliament as a tall Black man and I do not think they were fooling around.

Anne of Denmark had ordered a play “The Masque of Blackness” (1605) in praise of Black beauty which did not fade. The play was performed by members of the court and it explained how Blacks, The Sun People, came to Europe to look for a milder sun. In the play was a personage of The Niger River. The costume design shows a tall Black woman. Strange as this might sound; it took me after all three years to believe my own findings: Anne of Denmark which we know as a blindingly blond woman was almost certainly Black. As the whole Stuart dynasty was Black of skin.

When one looks for portraits of Charles II Stuart “The Black Boy” one finds many which show a White man, with long black hair and mustachio. But if one persists there are portraits which show black skin. Especially the National Portrait Gallery site shows many portraits of a Black skinned boy and later a Black adult. Still there is a lot of variations, but I have one pitch black portrait which show his classical African treats under a huge afro-like wig.

So there were Black Kings in Europe, who somehow traced their origins in Africa and symbolised their Blue blood with the image of a Moor. The portraits which show Blacks as White’s I would explain as propaganda to make them look as the White people they so despotically oppressed. Other white portraits are over painted authentic Black portraits, or whitened copies of these or outright fakes. All European museums show portraits of the European elite, with fake white skin colour. We know that all the European royal families were blood relatives.

The Black Boy’s mother, for instance, Henrietta Maria, was the daughter of Maria de Medici, Queen of France and the aunt of Louis XIV, The Sun King. The sister of The Black boy was Maria Henrietta Stuart who married the Dutch Stadholder William II. Their son was King Stadholder William III, who ruled Britain as William and Mary.

(All this can be verified in google)

71 thoughts on “Blue Blood is Black Blood 1500-1789 – Egmond Codfried”

  1. I am a blue blood and you got it wrong.. BLACK used in all english to ireland to france scandinavia germany all of it is the inter racism within white people between the two whites… caucasians, who have white skin and black hair, and teutons, who are the blondes, the source of germany, they came from the entry area of scandinavia from russia, they are albinoized mongoians so the germanic look is actually close to chinese or mongolian simply change norwegian blondes, on a computer, to black hair and eyes.. and you have a chinese person… a caucasian, that’s different, they are of the first waves out of africa, they did not, go around the mongolia across the top of europe and then descend as vikings route.. vikings, do not have a lot of body hair, no, they have straiht hair, round follicles, caucasians, celts, have oblong follicles thus curly hair, bushy hair, take mel gibson, he is a mix, of both, as am i, i am a bluebood, i have genetic disease porphyria that is connected with the royal ancient inbreeding, i suffer it lifelong, i’m 52… there are many uses of black heads and faces on iconography but they were WHITE people, it’s just that CELTS have a DIRECT LINK to AFRICA that most dont GET.. SCOTYA, the princess of egypt married a Spanish Celt the son of king malis of melis spain.. 3000 years ago.. and they sailed up and celtified ireland, and scotland, named it after gramma, scotyaland, that’s why kings there are still crowned standing on a rock from egypt that has it’s symbols on it, ratherlike, the celts see themselves, know themselves, to be persian, indian, meditteranean, africa, but NOT mongolian, NOT germanic, specifically…

    thus is north ireland the two still fight, the celts were simply NICER to others whereas the teutons are SUPERIORS always have been feeling that way, ALWAYS… with their big bodies and axes they took all of europe, see king clovis etc.. then england, then ireland, america… the CELTS were diminished to powder in the process left only the shores western of ireland and scotland i’m one of them, mixed with bavarian

    i descend from the second king of ireland, son of the first, niall, then aoidh, Mach Ae is our name, the first and largest greatest clanna in history of gaeldom

    a real mach oi i am

    we like afriancs, ireland, lets in EVERYBODY regardless.. Come be with us the Taoseich says.. yes, we have a spiritual leader of ireland, like persia has a supreme leader, ireland has the taoseich, not the prime minister, not the president, the Taoseich (Teesha) he’s the leader of IRELANDS CULTURE…. Gerry Adams, looks like a PERSIAN dead on… so do i ..

    they’re related.. it’s a trip, so sort out euro history, but for sure, there were black kings and slaves and peoples all as you say but NOT that CHARLES STUART was black that’s utterly impossible my friend

    no way, our stuarts, the scottish clann, they’re all black hair white skin just like the real paintins, the fake paintins by british haters paint him black to say: HE”S A FRIGGIN CELT…

    celts, were LOWER ever since saxons took over england

    black irish, they are not BLACK, nor DARK, they have BLACK HAIR ONLY but they are called black simply because of this because SO FEW teutons have BLACK HAIR… it’s utterly impossible… they HAVE to have something else in them, to get it, no way, do teutons EVER have curly black hair, no way, those kids with curly black hair and white white skin, are CELTIC WHITES CAUCASIANS WHO ARE CALLED BLACK IN EURO HISTORY SIMPLY BECAUSE OF THEIR HAIR MONIKER ONLY…. A SLUR TERM BY THE “WHITES” who have Yellowish Skin like BRAD PITT and straight hair that is blonde or white or sandy blonde, but STRAIGHT and their bodies are NOT LIKE ours… they are lean and straight, we are more like the rest of the world, woman have butts… germanics sometimes dont… woman have tits, many germanics dont.. they are lean, like cheatas, they are deadly.. fierce, the superior war whites, are the teutons, they now rule the world as the leaders of NATO, but that wont last… the link of the saxon and the jew banker is the current world control holder..

    celts hold nothing.. they are a people people.. they do music, hang out, work to survive, don’t ever conquer… have a history, have a culture, you’ll find the germanics never have a culture or history.. in modern times.. nope…

    even long ago, they were called the people with no history, for it is bloody, so it’s not remembered, they are about conquest.. capture, control..

    celts dance, and like all others and use black proudly as an icon so … hello and hi.

    “for you are where you are in the struggle”

  2. celtic looks, and peoples, do mix with, and derive from africa.. whereas tartian looks, turned to scandinavia, is another thing, when abe lincoln is painted, if you color his skin, he’ll look like a black man, like the picture above, yes, blacks are a part of euro history and blood but by the times you speak of i dont think there was black skin at the tops of a celtic kingdom in scotland etc.. i mean, i’m from them, i’m one of them, i’m a real ulster scots…. yes, we have more link to the arab hairy man and africa man.. for sure.. than the blondes, who have been “away longer”.. kcuf racism, anyways… THE PEOPLE ! and GOD !

  3. My latest efforts are opening a Suriname Blue Blood Is Black Blood museum dedicated to the true looks of European historical persons. I have finally been reading McRitchie’s Ancient and Modern Britons, and I find conformation of all I have been saying for the past years. He did not know about the black and brown skinned nobles living way into the 20th century. He stops at Charles II Stuart, quoting someone who described him as ‘sable hued.’ Now I have started a campaign to let Blacks all over the world know that all portraits in museums are fake, whitened over paints. This was done from 1848 tot 1960. But it might be still going on. The book by Alison McQueen about the 19th century cult of Rembrandt explains how the revolutionaries in 1848 decided that Rembrandt was the painter of the third estate, the white serfs. That were finally emancipated in that year. But, so they claimed, the paint had darkened, and the varnish yellowed. Next they retouched the faces and hands with white, beige and pink paint and whitened all the faces, claiming this is what the painters true intension was. I was so lucky to find a series of photos of Dutch Old Master portraits by Van Mierevelt, Ravesteyn and so on, from 1934 which show the un-retouched portraits. You may find them in google searching for Van Aerssen-Beyeren portraits.

  4. Dear Brother Farrah,
    The history of Blacks, the first people, did not start with the enslavement of Blacks in 1441 by their own Black European brethren, who were the noble and bourgeois elite of Europe. They were two equally brown and black complexioned European tribes fighting for power. All of history is about brown and black complexioned people. Whites never, ever found any civilization. Blacks civilized and Christianized the pagan hell out of whites in Europe. Among the nobles and bourgeois those with classical African facial traits were considered pure of blood. The nobility self-identified as Black by means of little heraldic Moors. The heraldic Moors in western art are symbols of blue blood and Black Superiority. They are usually not real persons, nor god forbid slaves: they are imaginary figures created by the painter as a symbol. The clever painters even did not need to have a Black person in front of them to whip up a magnificently dressed little or big Moor. The painted portraits are no instamatic snapshots, they are artificial and loaded with symbolism. Though some real life nobles, kings and emperors like Charles V Hapsburg or Leopold I Hapsburg, fully resembled these imaginary Moors in looks. So even if they were depicted white in concept, and loved the folly of painting up themselves white and bleaching their skins in real life: they identified as Black, as coming from Africa.
    And they saw themselves as superior over whites and the bourgeois castes. But we do not know this, and some find it almost impossible to believe because we have been deceived since 1848 with fake, whitened over paints of people who were described as black, brown, the black boy, more brown then white, swarthy, bad complexion, not the white hands, chimney sweeper, black as chimney, the black prince, black tom, ugly, etc. When you enter a museum the people who speak to you lie through their teeth. The paintings are over paints, often completely vandalized master pieces. And they write thick important ‘scientific’ books about this falsified data, that hides the true complexion of the ancient regime. The whites were considered shoe leather, until the invention of human races to elevate these whites to human level. The historical Declaration of Human Rights was on their behalf; the white serfs were asking to be regarded as humans by their brown and black skinned nobles. In this way the bourgeois philosophers of the Enlightenment forged a coalition between whites who were the majority and the bourgeois, who in defiance of the nobility identified themselves as Caucasians, or black Caucasians; to defeat the hated nobility. When they finally succeeded, the newly emancipated whites set out to rewrite history, extirpate their oppressors from history, and retouched all the faces of the hated ancient regime. Now, even as we speak, the whites keep this secret from us. But no more, I’m onto their little game, that I, with your help en blessing, will stop right now. Go to your museum and ask for a tour with magnifying goggles and demand to be shown the facial retouches, and next write to your city council about this scandalous falsehood perpetrated on Blacks.
    I have discovered a source of miscommunication between Americans and others as the State of American still believes in the unscientific concept of human races, assigning a race to every citizen. And in the US the North Africans, no matter of what complexion, are considered whites. We have all seen the Libyans and Egyptians marching on TV and we should decide for ourselves if they are white. Do they have a white identity? As the bourgeois and republican inspired, revolutionary leadership identified as white, though brown and black of complexion, Americans do not realize that the American Founding Fathers were far from lily-white of complexion. The fact that they were slave-owners does not make them white. The fact that Blacks introduced African slavery does not mean communities should not receive back pay from 350 years of slavery. But Blacks should not use back pay as a condition for taking back their freedom. It’s up to Blacks to do like me to flood the internet, the means of our deliverance from white supremacy and racism, with images and studies that show Europe was a Black Civilization. I do not understand why some Black scholars manage to find Black Kings in Mesoamerica, The Olmec’s, and Blacks sitting on the Imperial ancient Chinese thrones; but do not manage to find the Black Emperor Charles V Hapsburg. As if they do not want Blacks to be free.

    Greetings to you all and Best Wishes for 2013, the year of our deliverance.
    Egmond Codfried
    Suriname Blue Blood Is Black Blood Museum
    At The Hague.

  5. Firstly Brother Farrah is Sister Farrah ;)

    Secondly, thank you for your in depth reply Egmond – your site has been enlightening and has provided what may be missing links to my own thoughts around slavery and why it happened, to include the theft of Black invention.

    My point really was around the motives of white people in terms of WHY they enslaved black people. To me it sounds as if there was deep seated resentment, envy/jealousy at a) being treated in a certain way (leather for example) and b) the apparent achievements of Black people across Europe/Africa etc.

    I’m not saying that Blacks are in the wrong or right about being slave owners etc, my question is: is it your opinion that the reason White people have done what they have done is for revenge and envious reasons? And in addition to that, that their pursuit at world domination now really is an imitation of what we originally achieved?

    Also if you could share some sources I’d much appreciate it.

    Also I’ve shared with you a blog post I wrote a few months ago so you can “see” where I’m coming from.

    http://life-love-and-my-universe.blogspot.co.uk/2012/10/happy-anniversaryrace-and-prejudice.html

    Thanks :)

    .

  6. All congratulations Bro Egmond for this interesting research.I see know why all this paintings that the Mindele accepted to show looked somehow weird! Reason is as they have been whitened the features didn’t match anymore with the color of the face.

  7. Dear Sir,
    I have embarked on a campaign to make the public aware that all old master portraits in museums are overpaints. After 1848 when the third estate came to power they had all Ancien Regime portraits altered. This is clearly visible, the beige and pink over paint on top of brown faces and hands. The question is of whites should cary on this charade after 160 years. White supremacy is based on fake, whitened portraits of the noble and bourgeois elite which was described as brown and black of complexion. acism against Blacks is a liberation ideology to free Europe from noble domination. The nobility self-identified as Black with little heraldic Moors. I call for the end of Revisionism and the end of Racism.

    Still busy downloading my proof, but you may look in at my thread in minglecity.com about Jane Austen who was Black.

    egmond codfried

    Suriname Blue Blood is Black Blood Museum
    at The Hague, The Netherlands
    Bluebloodisblackblood.blogspot.com

  8. Thank you, My posts are blocked at rastalivewire by a hater.
    I have first provided you with my own sayings, and my books are the only books in the world that claim and show brown and black european nobles and kings. I make use of sources that talk about ‘the cult of Rembrandt’ but do not mention this cult included the whitening of portraits. Or books about the rise of the magi, the black king Balthazar, but which fail to connect him with the rise of the Black, Christian nobility and King. In fact any book or historical movie can be a source if one substitutes the persons and actors with Black persons. JARogers Sex and Race introduced the idea of modern Black royalty. He leads where Ancient and Modern Britons by David McRitchie left off. Paul Kaplan The rise of the magi traces the Black King at the birth of Jesus in imagery, but fails to link this to actual history with Blacks dominating.

    Slavery is not pay back, as we today did not oppress any serfs or used their skins for shoe leather. Racism was invented by bourgeois ‘scientists’ who also invented human races to elevate white serfs into humanhood. In order to forge an alliance to free Europe from noble rule. The bourgeois stole the French Revolution and whites were finally emancipated in 1848. They had all the paintings altered, this you can deduce from Alison McQueens book about the Cult of Rembrandt. In spite of all her sources she failed to write about the retouching of Rembrandts paintings.
    I’m quite clear that the whites who were kept as shoeleather cattle by the nobility had the right to free themselves, but I refuse to accept any notion of pay back. I rather ask if whites should not move on, as Blacks have moved on. So to me racism is a rational ideology, not to promote your former oppressor back into power, but this threat has lapsed, their are no black nobles and kings to oppress whites anymore. The problem is, if you accept that Europe was a Black Civilisation, where the artefacts are. Well they are in museums staring at us, but altered to resemble white people. We need to challenge these fake images and the people who are in the know.
    All would be clear if you reach for your copy of a Jane Austen novel to confirm she wrote solely about brown and black complexioned gentry and nobles. Emma would be the best or next Mansfield Park.

    Kindly keep sending me more questions, as you see I will try to answer all.

    egmond codfried
    bluebloodisblackblood@hotmail.com

  9. I seem to be able to post again.

    “” Sadi says All congratulations Bro Egmond for this interesting research.I see know why all this paintings that the Mindele accepted to show looked somehow weird! Reason is as they have been whitened the features didn’t match anymore with the color of the face.”

    What does the name ? Mindele mean?

    The European noble and bourgeois elite was brown and black of complexion, but some also had classical African facial traits, what some would call Black today. The nobility self-identified as Black with little heraldic Moors. Europe 1100-1848 was a Black, Black Identified civilization. Supremely documented, Yet they have changed the colour not the contours of the faces, so one can still see on some the frizzled hair and the lips and noses that are classical African. I have based my research on personal description that say a certain person was brown or black of complexion. When everybody has seen that the old masters are overpaints , then we will understand that Europe was dominated by Blacks, which is the reason why we have racism. Racism was invented by the brown and black complexioned bourgeoisie to get rid of the noble rule: racism is a liberation ideology. The whites and the bourgeoisie wanted to be free.
    How will you join my campaing to free us from racism in this very year?

    Egmond Codfried

    1. Dear brother Mindele is the lingala (central africa language)word meaning alien, or “uncomplete person” for those who come out of Black man and think they can dominate him. My contribution to our awakening is to read and spread what i gather from researchs like yours.Yaa Bless!

  10. To the makers of Hidden Colors
    The Hague, 22 January 2013.

    Mr. Tariq Nasheed,

    After carefully watching your DVD of Hidden Colors (2011) my conclusion is that you must be in league with the enemies of Blacks by presenting the unaware public with wrong and unfinished research, and by promoting further division among Blacks by linking Black History to anti- activism, anti-women liberation and anti-gay emancipation efforts. The divide between men and women is the greatest scorch, while all well thinking people understand that women need to be equal to men, that we need to get rid of the patriarchies of old, for Blacks to exist and prosper. By your vulgar gay bashing you have alienated Blacks from at least 20% of their own: parents, children, siblings, and taxpaying, fellow workers.

    And showing how the penal system is working against any Black as you did, is really meant to intimidate any Black in trying to overturn the status quo. The Fat Cats and bitter, mean spirited women, and the obviously closeted hateful gay professors, you have presented: utter old fashioned white solutions to the Black Problem and are basically telling Blacks: Do not bother, there is no use, be like us, join the capitalist system, rape women legally (prostitution) and bash your gays (only the men as women sexuality does not count) and all will be well in the world. The problems are shown as so great and so overwhelming, that the whites come off as these immensely powerful creatures who are always ahead, who have always conquered and vanquished Blacks from time immemorial, Blacks should not even THINK of trying to change anything.

    The truth and the lies are presented as a mix, so the debunking of your story is made hard, because there is truth is some parts although presented in a terribly wrong context. And you show the dreaded fakes, whitened images that were created to keep us in the dark. You fail to identify whites as albino derived, because this is what whites especially hate to hear, as it shows they did not come first and that they came out of Blacks, and thus could never, ever be superior to Blacks.

    I have recognized a few images which I have generally introduced on the web, and they are presented by you without the context of my Blue Blood Is Black Blood (1100-1848 ) Theory, scientific research, which basically says that Europe during this time should be regarded as a Black Civilisation, with brown and black complexioned native Europeans dominating, ruling, civilizing and christianising whites who are Asian, and a foolproof albino derived nation, but late comers. Part of the brown and black complexioned Europeans declared themselves in 1100-1200 a blue blood nobility and self-identified with heraldic Moors as Blacks. They created the Black King Balthasar, the Black Madonna’s and the numerous Black Saints as propaganda for Black Superiority. Together with the bourgeoisie they were the second estate, and both of these Black European ‘tribes’ oppressed the whites who were reduced to lowly serfs, and outcasts of the cast society. The elite even used their skins for shoe leather. The French Revolution brought the nobility down, but they re-emerged with restorations like the one by Napoleon. Your type of research after all these decades remains patchy, spotty and anecdotic when it comes to the presence of Blacks in Europe, for not naming names or showing Black portraits. Just like the enemies of Blacks like to keep it.

    The end was in 1848 with the final Revolutions when the third estate, the white serfs, were emancipated and got general suffrage for men. Next, in reverse they set out to ‘restore’ the portraits of the ancient regime to what they claimed was the true intention of the painters, and retouched the hell out of the supposedly ‘darkened’ paint back to white. An old photo of The Syndics by Rembrandt introduced by me on the web shows he made his figures all shades of brown and showed classical African facial traits along with colour. My museum has embarked on a international campaign to make the public aware of the fact that all Old Master portraits in museums are fake, whitened over paint, while the brown faces and brown hands underneath remain highly visible.

    In spite of this you showed a whitened, fake image of James I Stuart, the grandfather of Charles II Stuart who you did present as a Black person, somehow suggesting that the Nobility and Kingship was instigated by whites who intermarried with some Blacks, resulting in a few Black or ethnically mixed Kings. This is totally wrong, and this points to your intentionally unfinished and highly misleading research. The image of the Spanish Queen Isabelle shows her with long blond hair, which is totally ridiculous, with the Habsburgs famous for massive prognathism. The rule by Blacks is the cause of racism against Blacks today, as the bourgeois philosophers had invented Racism against the Black-identified nobility as a liberation ideology. Blacks are thus one step above apes, which were presented to the white masses as people who had degenerated because of their immoralness.

    There are many genealogies available which show intermarriage between and among nobles and royals, so with finding one or two Black person with those ranks, and comparing images with personal descriptions that say brown or black of complexioned, one can understand the whole elite to have been brown or black and self-identifying as Black. Images of Moors are symbolic and seldom represent real persons. A painter did not need to have a person in front of him to create an image of a Moor. There is no proof of Moorish persons directly from Africa teaching or having any powerful positions at universities or courts. The European Blacks are native, they regarded themselves as from the soil, and claimed senior rights over whites. The Islamic Moors that ruled Spain do not show up beyond the South of France, and there is no sign of any Islam among the ruling, brown and black complexioned European Christian elite, after they were driven from Spain. This misinformation all leads to a dead end, and serves the enemy of Blacks well.

    Because your message is no threat to white supremacy teachings of history which omits Blacks as an elite, and because you present so-called scholars who manage to find Black Emperors sitting on China’s thrones, and Black Kings in Mesoamerica, but cannot find extremely well documented and depicted European Emperors like Leopold I Habsburg, or Charles V Habsburg that represent a Black Civilisation: it seems to me they are working AGAINST Blacks Liberation. That’s also why your false prophets of hatred can be so successful, they are part of the oppressing system. They represent how the enemy of Blacks who never sleeps has co-opted Black History and has tried to turn it in an instrument of hatred, derision, division and oppression. Like how slavery was perpetrated with the help of some Blacks to enslave and keep Blacks in slavery. You are not part of the solution, but part of the problem. You are all Fat Cat sell-outs, well ensconced, with a well-feathered nest, but out and out TRAITORS to the Blacks. You bold facedly introduce more and new division between Blacks. Really not better then the Africans who from 1441 sold Africans to the Black Europeans who kept their brethren in slavery.

    The only merit from your DVD is that Blacks can come face to face with their direct enemies.

    Egmond Codfried
    Curator Suriname Blue Blood Is Black Blood Museum
    Bluebloodisblackblood.blogspot.com
    bluebloodisblackblood@hotmail.com

  11. “Sadi says : Dear brother Mindele is the lingala (central africa language)word meaning alien, or “uncomplete person” for those who come out of Black man and think they can dominate him. My contribution to our awakening is to read and spread what i gather from researchs like yours.Yaa Bless!”

    I would say, it’s the whites who still carry a grudge, who still have a victim mentality by keeping a fight, a fear going on that should have passed already. they should just move on. In France I was taken aback in Marseille where they showed you bulletholes on a church were people were executed by the German invaders. I was thinking about the people who were murdered by the French themselves in Algeria.So we now have a handle on Racism, a liberation ideology, and the retouched portraits they maintain and show should be scrubbed clean. no more lies, no more secrecy, no more keeping us out of the kitchen, the cat is out of the bag. I have always maintained white supremacy is based on fake, whitened portraits, but only now I can see what I have postulated. That is why they seem to have all these writers and scientist, because they whitened the hell out of these Black portraits, proof that a brown and black skinned elite ruled and civilized whites. This is a new dawn, but we need to go out and point these fakes out. They bring our children to see them and the children should be forewarned that they will be shown fakes. And they should holler, and embarress the people who have been playing us for fools for so long now. Enough is enough.

  12. This stuff should be taught to black children. But after for so many years that they are useless subhumans. When you aware that you belong to the most hated group.on the earth and there isn’t a common thread holding your group together, you are left with a sense of hopeless. And it makes you wonder why would one so called race go to such lengths to discredit another so called race. Like my grandmother says, “Donkey, sey de world nuh level.”

    After dem dun teef you history, teef you land, teef your humanity, teef you people as slaves, dem a now reteef de people and a sey dem dont belong to you. And not all of Africa belongs to you in first place. The only part that belongs to you are the areas below the desert. This is absolute loonisy. We stand back and watch itall happen because we have been physically and psychologically rendered powerless. Why are whites and the hybrids they have created in Africa telling the indigineous people of the land, “Go back where you came from.”

    1. We are not powerless. I believe I irk Blacks by saying they are not victims, and there is a way out. Look for the International Campaingn against falsefied old master portraits and codfried in google. You cannot take on a whole bastion, but you can hammer away at the weakest point. This is the weakest link in their bastion of lies and hatred: the fake portraits. Take yourself to a museum, look closely at the faces and the hands, and you will see they are an over paint. If we challenge the veracity of the portraits, their pride and joy: Blacks will be free. There in all museums is the proof of the Black European elite I was talking about.

  13. A very interesting theory. I am a fan of Dumas and I am fascinated by European history and European monarchy thanks to him. What I have always found most confusing is his love for the nobility and his Royalist sentiments considering that he was an illegitimate child and a mulatto. You have just answered that question for me. He is in fact writing about the great deeds of his fellow mulattos in his tales.
    Your article about Jane Austen was most intriguing. Her preoccupation with complexions was like Dumas a result of her mulatto ancestry. Dumas’ most celebrated hero D’Artagnan was brown. The beautiful Queen Margot was a dark beauty. Her husband Henry IV of France and her lover La Mole were both very dark. His most formidable villainess “Milady” was very pale and had blonde hair and green eyes. Her paleness was conspicuous which is strange considering that Europe was supposed to be a white continent. Her son Mordant’s pale complexion was supposed to be nauseating for the beholder.
    About a year ago I came across a documentary called The Arrivals. It was about the New World Order but the reason why I’m writing about it is because they talk about how the Pharaohs’ bloodline is flowing in the European monarchy. If we do some research on Google like you said, you see that this is not a far fetched idea. Cleopatra was the last Pharaoh of Egypt. Her successor Cleopatra Selene II, who was of Greek and Roman ancestry was the ruler of Libya. From here we see how the seat of power shifted from Egypt to Africa to Rome and then to the rest of Europe. We see how the Egyptian culture became part of the European monarchy. Egyptian practices such as face painting, wig wearing, embalming of dead bodies and storing the dead monarchs’ heart in urns became part of the culture of the Europeans monarch. Like Egyptians and Romans, the European monarchs also preserved their pure bloodlines by intermarriages. I recently came across the portrait of a french princess with a pyramid in the background.
    If you research on my theories, I’m sure you’ll find that all these things are connected.

    1. Kindly peruse my blog: bluebloodisblackblood.blogspot.com. Was Dumas illegtimate? His grandfather did not marry Dumas, the ex-slave woman, but he named his son after him, giving him a noble title. The grandson, our writer, had this name, and was a noble man, mixing with the nobility, not looking much different from them. According to Jane Austen the noble and bourgeouis elite were 2-5% (or 2-3%) of the population, and they were light brown or sallow, brown, very brown or black of complexion. The ones with classical African facial traits, like Austen herself did have, were ‘peculiar’ in looks, ‘distinguished,’ proof of pure blood and proof of having noble blood in the familyline. Not all looked classical African, but then again in Africa there are many facial types. The brown and the black Europeans were the first Europeans, the whites are Central Asian late comers of 400 AD. Because of seniority issues, the brown and blacks elevated themselves into a nobility (1100-1200). Austen wrote against the lost of power of these Blacks (1100-1848) who civilized and christianized Blacks, ruling the whites who were their serfs, using them as shoe leather. Whites were only emancipated in 1848 and whitened history, having all portraits either destroyed or whitened by over paint.

  14. Edmond Codfried you are a true scholar of the highest order. Your research is impeccable and worthy of praise. I have been studying the Atlantic Slave Trade and here is what I have discovered thus far. The Atlantic Slave Trade is nothing more than a rouge that never happened as we might think. The European settlers (invaders, not settlers) did not have to go to Africa to get one single black person. We were already here and a part of the indigenous and native populace. I have been fact checking the math and it does not add up. Each of the largest ships could only carry approximately 400 individuals per-trip with an average voyage time of approximately 2 to 3 months (1619-1865). If you take all the companies involved and the number of ships and of course factor in people on the periphery. I could not get past approximately 560,000 kidnapped victims. The question has to be asked, “Where did the other 14,000,000 come from?” When I checked other European explorers who visited these shores (North and South America) and they spoke all these black tribes/ethnic groups they encountered along the way, then everything began to make sense. One of the answer can be found in the Louisiana purchase of 1803…land that was not a part of the original purchase agreement, land which belonged to the Pre-Columbians. A great deal black tribes are still in South America today. US history books call them escaped slaves…they enslaved the native population and made it appear as though they brought them from Africa.

    1. I believe you when you say there were already Africans in the America’s before new ones were brought in. I read that the Brazilian ‘Indians’ as they are called had a more complex civilization, bigger cities etc, and numbered a lot more then we believe.
      But I kindly point out that slavery does not explain the position of Blacks today. Our history is strongly connected with the European Blacks (1100-1848), but we are not supposed to know about, as all their portraits are over painted. Anyone can go to any museum right now and look at the old masters, portrait and some genre pieces, and see the over paint.
      If we challenge this big secret, they do their utmost to keep, we will defeat white supremacy and racism. But you have to show courage and pay and go to a museum, and answer back to me. We can free ouselves without bloodshed, without rioting, burning and having shoot outs. We just quietly challenge the paintings, the one weak spot I have discovered in 2005, and am now promoting. We need chapters in all cities, two to three educated people, who will go to their museum, examine the portraits and start a campaign to discredit them. If Blacks want to be free in 2013, they need to get moving right now, Housenegroes are asked not to help this campaing, they are really the enemies of Blacks, hired and paid by the racist governments.

    2. I am starting to wonder if the underground railway is another white lie being used to account for black presence in Canada. And black historians are repeating the same white lie. I always found it odd that these so called runaway slaves not only made their way this far north but in no time they became prominent land and business owners in a very racist white society. Maybe the black people were always here and thats why they were promiinent members of society. Black Canadian history is not taught in school but around February of each year, you may find a few posters around that tells of black presence in canada. Nova Scotia and ontario we are told had black settlements. There was a black woman who was
      Executed in quebec but they act as if she was the only black person living in that province.

  15. INTERNATIONAL CAMPAIGN AGAINS FALSIFIED, OVER PAINT PORTRAITS OF ALL OLD MASTERS IN ALL MUSEUMS
    LOOK FOR THIS IN GOOGLE UNDER MY NAME.

    http://minglecity.com/profiles/blogs/international-campaign-against-false-whitened-over-paints-of-all
    http://api.ning.com/files/vf4DkD4*4JQxS7Ml2QeXDesxTOtf5nMhyXEgBnigLAV3In-b5vLCHi1JYMwwI-mBikaAhecw0*vBvhVLjFUa3ST5g58vuEkA/2DeStaalmeestersfotovanvrderetouchFirmaBraun.jpg

    [Syndics by Rembrandt: this is what all old master portraits looked like: Black Europeans who were the masters of the white serfs]
    My eight year Blue Blood is Black Blood (1100-1848) research has come to fruition, and I have now started a International Campaign against falsified, over paint portraits by old masters in all museums. You may start your own local chapter to end white supremacy and racism. All you need to do is go the museum near you and look at the old masters and notice they are all ugly, over paints. All of them. The brown and black skin still visible under the fake beige and pink layers. The Black contours, lips and noses, and frizzled hair they did not alter. They have painted around the pearl necklaces, and you see a gap. The facial hair is repainted on top of the fake layers, as you cannot paint beige between hairs. The face layer is higher then the surroundings. The hair is lightened by highlights. Because of my dedicated research Blacks need not holler, loot, burn, have shoot outs and rape to have white supremacy ended. You just start a great rumor about the paintings all over the world. This is the secret they are still keeping from us for the past 160 years.
    Our enemy is ourselves. The whites see Blacks hacking each other to dead on TV and do not want to hear about racism. Nor can they believe that Blacks can be agents of civilization. So we will not talk about racism anymore but about scientific fraud, scientific misconduct, hoaxing the public with falsified portraits. This whites will understand fraud. They can see it also once pointed out to them, and once you have seen them, you cannot go back. So the struggle has been moved to another arena. A more civilized, genteel., cultured arena. The enemy are the housen*ggers who have constantly sold us out. The Black History Month was created for them, by the racist state so they can get some money too, while they teach and mentally enslave Blacks that they are slaves, come from slaves, always be slaves. We are not slaves, Blacks were nobles, kings and emperors. But their folly was the infighting between the nobbles and the bourgeoisie, and the oppression of whites. The whites fought until 1848, were given universal suffrage , and had all portraits altered to resemble whites, extirpating brown and blacks from history.
    The relevant source, though incomplete is the study: Alison Macqueen, The Rise of The Cult of Rembrandt in 19th Century France, 2003. She shows how History was falsified by deliberately choosing Rembrandt as a revolutionary figure head, claiming he painted whites, the third estate. Which he did not. But they also claimed the paint had darkened and retouched the hell out of the brown faces, making the noble and bourgeoisie elite white. Do not argue with me, even if you are a white person: just go see the museum and look at the faces and hands.
    Hope to hear from folks who want to free us from racism right now in 2013. We have a window of opportunity right now. We have the internet, so we can do it right now. We need to point at the fakes and shout FAKE. Start a local Chapter, of three genteel, educated persons, and do what needs to be done, never harming the precious portraits that are our proof that Blacks ruled Europe (1100-1848). Just be beware of the housenegroes, do not include these fat cats in your operation or it will fail. .

    Egmond Codfried
    Curator Suriname Blue Blood Is Black Blood Museum
    The Hague.

  16. How can you fight a race of devils who are using pseudo science, statistics, the media, laws to defame, demonize, and dehumanize black people, and set them up so that the world can hate them. How do we combat the invisible war, a nameless a war when all you know its damaging you psyche but you cannot pinpoint the source because you will be inflicted with further onslaught and be called a racist? Like the late great Robert Nester Marley said, “Babylon release the chain but now dem a use dem brain.” And, “They don’t want to see us unite. ALL They want us to do is keep on killing one another, top rankin,”

  17. Its n longer pinkness of skin that gives one entry into Club Caucasian. Black/Brown people are being reclassified as Caucasians and a few reasons come to mind. One, to increase the dwindling world wide pink population. Two, to further the lie that Africa has never made any significant contribution to the world i.e. neither the Egytians nor the Ethiopians were black. And that great Empire that Zimbabwe once hosted, they had Caucasians behind them. Yes, I have heard white racists claiming the original Zimbabweans were white and that’s the only explanation for their great civilization. The Olmecs look like negro male faces and NOT
    Native North Americans and the sphinx looks like a negro female face despite the nose being destroyed. Im not sure which Pharaoh the Sphinx is suppose to be but in my opinion, the features are distinctively negroid and female.

    To further explain a lack of representation of pink people in the hot Eastern sun, whites reclassify the black/brown people of that region as Caucasians to further their manifest destiny (the only winners in all this will be the pink squatters of Europe) and Agenda white Supremacy and destruction of the black race. Another reason for this new classification is to create one single human race (Caucasian) and a race of subhumans aka subsaharan Africa, and aka niggers (another class of animals in the animsl kingdom).

    Yet another reason for this new classification is to dehumanize, mentally criple, psychologically terrorize the truth authors if civilization. slavery, christianity and islam was used to further the above agenda but the black people came out seemingly unscathed and are now making a come back. “They even have black scholars like James, Bernal, and etc whom we have used intimidation and terrorism on to stop them from telling the truth and that doesn’t seem to work. ” So whites came up with a longer lasting method that they can spread using media now that many have access to it. ” let’s kill them [black people] before they grow [mentally stronger].Despite the varying genotyopes and phenotypes amongst so called Africans (supra and sub saharans) and black people still giving birth to whites, facial features is being used as a classification. LIES are not exact science ( how many times did Bin Laden die) and thats why even east asians with wider noses and fuller lips are being reclassified as Caucasian so to reevent one human race of caucasians.
    The one drop of black blood rule no longer applies. The brilliance of great scholars like Dubois (Darkwater), Booker T. Washington (Up From Slavery) and Paul Laurence Dunbar (Sympathy, brilliant poem by a brilliant poet) will be explained away using whiteness whether or not they had immediate white ancestors.

  18. Since, “You can fool some people sometimes but you can’t fool all the people all the time,” not all suprasaharan Africans are falling for this trick. Despite a great majority of suprasaharan Africans accepting entry in Club White, there are many who are refusing entry and are saying,”I am a black African.” I have been fortunate enough to meet a few proud suprasaharan Africans who are not ashamed of being an original hue-man. The proud suprasaharan Africans are being labelled as Afrocentrics, a label that depicts some kind of mental defect for wanting the truth to be told – a demonization and ridicule for seekers who refuse to be clouded by Eurocentism, lies, darkness, unhealthy, diseases state of mind that leaves non pinkoids in a state of darkness and self hatred.

    1. Dear friend Sailor Moon,
      I have read most of your replies, and I will tell you something I was not prepared to accept and you might want to reject out of hand: at first look. As I’m travelling the world on a virtual speaking tour, I entered many, many forums. And the whites do not accept any charge of racism, genocide, exploitation, nor oppression. They point to what Blacks are doing right now in front of CNN and BBC camera’s: hacking each other to dead. We cannot deny it. The only answer I can think off, is that Blacks are not unlike others, humans just love killing each other. If the killing in Europe has stopped for now, for the past only 65 years, they make up by killings in Asia and Africa. So, we need to go about this another way. BLACKS ARE NOT VICTIMS. Whites do not owe them a thing. So as I suggested earlier in a post, we are going to look for scientific fraud, falsified history by falsefied portraits. I assume as whites and all people were aghast as the doping biking scandel unfolded, or the mad cow disease scandal of cow farmers feeding dead cows to life ones, or the present horsemeat scandal, a lot of people might object to be shown falsefied art, portraits that have been tampered with. Now if we pour our anger in that, we might see a change. Do not you agree? So no racism and woe is me, but denounce false portraits and scientific misconduct by the museum people, on our tax payer money too.

  19. TO THE EXECUTIVE BOARD OF THE DUTCH ROYAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES IN Amsterdam. CC the DA, MIN OF EDUC. On: THE INTERNATIONAL CAMPAIGN AGAINST MASS SCIENTIFIC FRAUD, MISREPRESENTATION AND INSTITUTIONAL MISCONDUCT BY FALSEFIED, OVER PAINTED OLD MASTER PORTRAITS PRESENTED TO THE UNWARY PUBLIC

    The Hague, 14 March 2013.

    Dear Sirs, Hans Chang, and Theo Mulder

    This is to inform you about my discovery of a massive scientific fraud and institutional scientific misconduct through the alleged scientific management, the so-called scientific description and by misleading the public by exhibition of falsified old master portraits in all museums. Our restorers, our museum directors and our Directors are therefore criminal organizations at the expense of the taxpayers. All old master portraits and some genre scenes were in the period 1848 -1960 whitened.

    This followed immediately after the emancipation of the Third Estate in France resulting in universal male suffrage, and our own major constitutional change that took away some privileges of the nobility. To avoid relapse the revolutionary governments decided that all portraits of the Ancien Régime must be painted over with beige and pink paint. They claimed that the paint had darkened, while the painter wanted to depict white people. So all the old master portraits were supposedly restored or whitened.

    Rembrandt was deliberately, against all evidence proclaimed to be the revolutionary painter of the third estate, while his figures around 1880, were re-painted, as whites. This is evidenced by a photograph of the original Syndics. This can also be derived from photos from 1934 of un-retouched portraits of Van Aerssen-Beyeren collection, the richest family in the Republic.

    This concerns the true brown and black complexions of the noble, bourgeois or regent Masters (1100-1848) who were using the skin of their serfs as shoe leather. The good news is that this is still highly visible by the naked eye on the faces and hands. The facial hair was re-painted on the false beige face layer, the hair lightened by blonde highlights, the skin layer was re-painted around the pearl necklaces, and that the false face layer is higher than the rest. The hands often look like claws, while the classical African and frizzled hair were maintained.

    This is even worse than the Professor Diederik Stapel scandal, the Bicycle Sport Doping scandal, the Mad Cow Disease scandal and the present Horse Meat scandal put together and is very damaging to the reputation of the Netherlands, and the majority of the brown and black complexioned world population. Kindly sent your response within two weeks.

    Sincerely,
    Your obedient servant,
    Egmond Codfried,
    Curator Suriname Blue Blood Blood Is Black Museum,
    Eemstraat 36/2515 VS The Hague.
    OPEN LETTER

  20. VIRGINIA WOOLF’S INDIAN ROOTS
    http://www.biography.com/imported/images/Biography/Images/Profiles/W/Virginia-Woolf-9536773-1-402.jpg
    Virginia Woolf –Stephen must have been half or quarter Indian, her grandma was born in India, and she married an Ashkenazi Jew, Leonard Woolf, who has Dutch and German sounding ancestors. And he worked eight years in Ceylon, before he married Virginia Stephen. Virginia Woolf’s ancestors were named Pattle, clearly an Anglicization of Patel. She was clearly very dark complexioned, with full lips and thick Black hair twisted in a very Indian looking bun. Part of the fierce allure of Indian women is how they raise their arms, frame their bosom, and violently tie their beautiful locks in a bun. Her portraits which show a white skinned woman are whitened fakes, to hide her darkness. I wonder if there is any reference to India in her books, or that part of her personality can be understood as reflecting an Indian Identity. She is always shown wearing the latest flapper fashions so she and Vanessa, her even darker sister must have been a true traffic stopping spectacle to behold.
    http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-BMNz_EZIcqY/TpyLNznSCUI/AAAAAAAAOSs/NuPDju0v8fE/s1600/2%2BVanessa_Bell_1910_338080s.jpg
    [Vanessa Bell]
    http://www.smith.edu/libraries/libs/rarebook/exhibitions/images/stephen/large24a.jpg
    [Virginia Pattle Somers-Cocks (1827-1910]
    There is reference to incest in her youth, starting at 14 by one or two step-brothers, who were the sons of the widow her father married, after Virginia’s mother died. He is supposed to also have molested her sister Vanessa Bell. But Virginia is also supposed to have had an intimate relation with her sister Vanessa. I need to read more to understand if she was a victim, and if this episode made her more disturbed then she already was. Somehow the fact that she took her life at an age when many people die anyway, makes it less significant to me.
    http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_giq9fYBHrwc/SqD4d9GYw_I/AAAAAAAACJs/y0YmvOukf24/s320/edef.jpg
    [Eliza de Feuillide]
    I compare her to Eliza Comtesse de Feuillide, the cousin of Jane Austen. She was born in India and I suspect her father Tysoe Hancock to be (part) Indian, as her sole miniature shows her slanted oriental eyes. She also brags about ‘heightening the native brown of her complexion with a tan,’ to her niece James, by staying two years in the country. Which shows that some nobles did tan, as the brown skin stood for high birth, and nobility. Yet others also bleached their complexion, or used white make up, called ‘rouging.’ She talks with admiration of how white Marie Antoinette’s hands and arms are, while it’s clear that this was achieved by ‘art.’ She spent some time at Versailles and moved in the highest circles.
    http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-vesftDPLNmg/ThxwUotMxkI/AAAAAAAAABY/T_c0OV_YD8s/s1600/book+cover+A5.jpg
    De Feuillide also mentions that a the sister of a sister-in- law of The Austen’s married an Indian, with a British sounding name. My ‘Was Jane Austen (1775-1817) Black?’ publication already deals with the brown and black complexions of the Austens, as being part of the 2-3% brown and black Europeans who ruled the white Europeans, or the third estate. It’s highly improbable that all these rich persons managed to live with only one portrait made, so when we are told there is only one known portrait, we can be sure the others are too black to be shown.
    Elizabeth Barrett Browning befriended an Anglo- Indian poet, who was a lesbian, writing how two women can make each other very happy, during a time we think such a thing could not be discussed. Virginia had lesbian relations with Vita Sackville, a noble women. She was very dark skinned and had a moustache. Woolf based Orlando on her, as it talks of how a young noble man suddenly turned into a woman.
    http://image1.findagrave.com/photos250/photos/2009/326/1574_125899715147.jpg
    [Merle Oberon]
    Actress Merle Oberon was half Indian, and looks quite dark skinned in later photographs; so during her former film career was considerably whitened in some way. She is supposed to have been a lover of Prince Philip, who visited her in Mexico, where she had n estate. I also think about Johanna van Gogh- Bonger, who was the painter Vincent van Gogh’s sister in law. We have her to thank for his fame, as she managed and prudently exhibited his collection, inherited by her’s and Theo van Gogh’s son: Vincent van Gogh. She was a very dark skinned Indonesian or part Indonesian (?) women, described as ‘a distinguished, great lady.’

    http://www.aloj.us.es/galba/monograficos/VAN%20GOGH/Fotografias/Familiares/Theo/JohannaBonger.jpg
    [Johanna Van Gogh-Bonger]
    http://api.ning.com/files/PmCHYsj-yF-7WH1YTvagTnTAif9NCsHUrLs92GFr1cXOADa78UdlKM2IMeZwzQ96eQm8KtT19Q-ivu*CtvxpD-JwwlsPDDwD/002.jpg
    [Maria Jacoba van Goor]
    It troubles me that these persons are whitened, even today, and no mention is of their roots. Bonger’s brother collected art as well, and helped her to manage the Van Gogh Collection, and his taste seems to me reflecting the love for a magical reality of Indonesians. As these persons mingled with the brown and black complexion European elite, I also wonder how strong the non-European influence really was. This we can only find out if today persons from these same back grounds start sifting through the sources. In this way even many known quotes become different and more significant to a person’s life, identity and work. When Isabelle de Charrière says ‘she does not have the white hands,’ she does not say her hands were ugly, but she confirms she was a brown skinned noble woman. As her rich, regent class grandmother Maria Jacoba van Goor (1687-1737) looks classical African on a whitened Herman Serin portrait. It was this change finding that lead me to discover the blue blood is black blood theory (1100-1848), that the nobility was brown and black, and that all old master portraits are whitened since 1848-1960.

    Egmond Codfried
    Curator Suriname Blue Blood Is Black blood Museum
    The Hague

    http://www.biography.com/people/virginia-woolf-9536773
    http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/read/INDIA/1999-04/0924161053
    http://books.google.nl/books?id=ZpQ4GG-Ng2gC&pg=PA198&lpg=PA198&dq=virginia+woolf+india&source=bl&ots=DUFaxuchiu&sig=nuvzmBjyZ6_qV8Blw3FYcqAh1gA&hl=nl&sa=X&ei=4DVIUYjiLYaV0QXt0YG4Dw&ved=0CFEQ6AEwBA#v=onepage&q=virginia%20woolf%20india&f=false
    http://www.smith.edu/libraries/libs/rarebook/exhibitions/stephen/24a.htm

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CAPTCHA Image

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>