The Irish Slave Trade – The Forgotten “White” Slaves

Spread the love
726
Shares

The Slaves That Time Forgot

By John Martin

They came as slaves; vast human cargo transported on tall British ships bound for the Americas. They were shipped by the hundreds of thousands and included men, women, and even the youngest of children.

Whenever they rebelled or even disobeyed an order, they were punished in the harshest ways. Slave owners would hang their human property by their hands and set their hands or feet on fire as one form of punishment. They were burned alive and had their heads placed on pikes in the marketplace as a warning to other captives.

We don’t really need to go through all of the gory details, do we? After all, we know all too well the atrocities of the African slave trade. But, are we talking about African slavery?

King James II and Charles I led a continued effort to enslave the Irish. Britain’s famed Oliver Cromwell furthered this practice of dehumanizing one’s next door neighbor.

The Irish slave trade began when James II sold 30,000 Irish prisoners as slaves to the New World. His Proclamation of 1625 required Irish political prisoners be sent overseas and sold to English settlers in the West Indies. By the mid 1600s, the Irish were the main slaves sold to Antigua and Montserrat. At that time, 70% of the total population of Montserrat were Irish slaves.

Ireland quickly became the biggest source of human livestock for English merchants. The majority of the early slaves to the New World were actually white.

From 1641 to 1652, over 500,000 Irish were killed by the English and another 300,000 were sold as slaves. Ireland’s population fell from about 1,500,000 to 600,000 in one single decade. Families were ripped apart as the British did not allow Irish dads to take their wives and children with them across the Atlantic. This led to a helpless population of homeless women and children. Britain’s solution was to auction them off as well.

During the 1650s, over 100,000 Irish children between the ages of 10 and 14 were taken from their parents and sold as slaves in the West Indies, Virginia and New England. In this decade, 52,000 Irish (mostly women and children) were sold to Barbados and Virginia. Another 30,000 Irish men and women were also transported and sold to the highest bidder. In 1656, Cromwell ordered that 2000 Irish children be taken to Jamaica and sold as slaves to English settlers.

Many people today will avoid calling the Irish slaves what they truly were: Slaves. They’ll come up with terms like “Indentured Servants” to describe what occurred to the Irish. However, in most cases from the 17th and 18th centuries, Irish slaves were nothing more than human cattle.

As an example, the African slave trade was just beginning during this same period. It is well recorded that African slaves, not tainted with the stain of the hated Catholic theology and more expensive to purchase, were often treated far better than their Irish counterparts.

African slaves were very expensive during the late 1600s (50 Sterling). Irish slaves came cheap (no more than 5 Sterling). If a planter whipped or branded or beat an Irish slave to death, it was never a crime. A death was a monetary setback, but far cheaper than killing a more expensive African.

The English masters quickly began breeding the Irish women for both their own personal pleasure and for greater profit. Children of slaves were themselves slaves, which increased the size of the master’s free workforce. Even if an Irish woman somehow obtained her freedom, her kids would remain slaves of her master. Thus, Irish moms, even with this new found emancipation, would seldom abandon their kids and would remain in servitude.

In time, the English thought of a better way to use these women (in many cases, girls as young as 12) to increase their market share: The settlers began to breed Irish women and girls with African men to produce slaves with a distinct complexion. These new “mulatto” slaves brought a higher price than Irish livestock and, likewise, enabled the settlers to save money rather than purchase new African slaves.

This practice of interbreeding Irish females with African men went on for several decades and was so widespread that, in 1681, legislation was passed “forbidding the practice of mating Irish slave women to African slave men for the purpose of producing slaves for sale.” In short, it was stopped only because it interfered with the profits of a large slave transport company.

England continued to ship tens of thousands of Irish slaves for more than a century. Records state that, after the 1798 Irish Rebellion, thousands of Irish slaves were sold to both America and Australia.

There were horrible abuses of both African and Irish captives. One British ship even dumped 1,302 slaves into the Atlantic Ocean so that the crew would have plenty of food to eat.

There is little question that the Irish experienced the horrors of slavery as much (if not more in the 17th Century) as the Africans did. There is, also, very little question that those brown, tanned faces you witness in your travels to the West Indies are very likely a combination of African and Irish ancestry.

In 1839, Britain finally decided on it’s own to end it’s participation in Satan’s highway to hell and stopped transporting slaves. While their decision did not stop pirates from doing what they desired, the new law slowly concluded THIS chapter of nightmarish Irish misery.

But, if anyone, black or white, believes that slavery was only an African experience, then they’ve got it completely wrong.

Irish slavery is a subject worth remembering, not erasing from our memories. But, where are our public (and PRIVATE) schools???? Where are the history books? Why is it so seldom discussed?

Do the memories of hundreds of thousands of Irish victims merit more than a mention from an unknown writer? Or is their story to be one that their English pirates intended: To (unlike the African book) have the Irish story utterly and completely disappear as if it never happened.

None of the Irish victims ever made it back to their homeland to describe their ordeal. These are the lost slaves; the ones that time and biased history books conveniently forgot.

http://afgen.com/forgotten_slaves.html


Spread the love
726
Shares

541 thoughts on “The Irish Slave Trade – The Forgotten “White” Slaves”

  1. Just found your site.

    I have just read the book ‘to hell or Barbados’ based on documentary evidence of the Irish Slave Trade. It is one of the most vile stories ever told, and I am ashamed that at 51 years of age I was ignorant of my own history and even more ashamed that it has been airbrushed out of Irish history history when I was going to school and indeed world history. It is a scandal of the highest order notwithstanding the fact that these people’s memory, my people have been forgotten. Well, not by me, now that I know, I am going to do something about it. As long as I live it will be my mission to do something about their memory. They shall not be forgotten.

    I thank Rasta Live Wire for the space they have provided on the Irish Slave Trade history

  2. We are all brothers and sisters, black or white. Go back far enough and we all came from common mothers. Our only differences became our geographical distribution which led to one group abusing another. Families on the same streets fight each other, neighbourhoods form sports teams and battle with each other. Provinces take it a step further, then countries and so on and so on. Just wait until the aliens from outer space arrive……! One Love!

  3. even in victorian times Irish were classed as a non-white race, the establishment using darwinism to racially identify Irish people as being “decended from a primative negro race mixed with celtic blood”. You can see from Irish and Negro pictures (the same picture but one in black the other white) or just google (irish negro picture) for an example. I am proud to be Irish and glad we were not reconised as “white”. personally I think thir narrow lips are horrible, pround of my numbian nose and fuller lips! Irish communist James Connolly recounts an apocryphal story about a slave owner who tells his black slave to climb to the roof of his house and repair some damaged slates.
    The slave replies “I could do that for you, but if I fall and die, you’ll lose the $50 you paid for me, you’ll then have to pay to bury me and take care of my family. If you pay that Irish labourer 50 cents a day instead, and he falls, he costs you nothing and you can get another one tomorrow!” THAT WAS THE ONES LUCKY ENOUGH NOT TO BE SLAVES. hope Irish, African and other non white races can forge better relationships. remember Fredrick Douglas (African American) and Daniel O’Connell’s (Irish liberator) friendship in fighting for irish and black freedom.

    1. True. The ancient Picts, Celts, Fomorians and the Druids were all dark skinned folks, mostly from the Cushites of Africa. Even the original Vikings were “darkies”. These were the original inhabitants of these islands, and their genes still live on in the bloods of the darker- shade “caucasians” from Russia to Switzerland and Ireland.

  4. Hi my name is Hirute and I am of Jamaican descent, as I was reading some of your coments I realized that the Irish being in Jamaica is true. I was wondering if the surname Mcleod is an Irish or Scottish????? Also he said that his grandmother was of a fair complexion. I am really interested to know. Thank you.

    1. Mcleod is Scottish, but Scottish and Irish tended to mix quite alot historically anyway… My great great grandfather was Scottish but his surname (McNamee, or MacNamidhe if you want the none anglocised version) is very Irish (translates as hound of Meath) also know some of my Irish ancestors were sold as slaves during the Cromwellian period (we hate him!) lol any way hope that helped even if I did ramble 4 a bit

  5. Thanks for this btw! I get so annoyed when people forget that the Irish went through the same thing and you find so little on Irish slavery

  6. Mcleod is scottish my sister is Mcleod..I am of Scottish lineage too but my name is Johnson.

    A part of me wonders whether the Irish slaves were of Romany descent. As it appears to be around the same century travellers came to UK from India. Till this day they are outcasted of society. Irish travellers were also called names like ‘dirty gypses’, and I wonder if that is reference to there complexion being darker than the average white person, it cpuld be they are of Indian origins but have now some what assimilated with the society, there complexion is darker but not an obvious link to an Indian type of complexion..
    As someone mentioned earlier on in the comments the Irish are found to be different genetically to white europeans. If we are saying English people treated there own white Irish people horribly, what happened to the travellers who were more obviously diffferent and poor. It’s a shame none of their history has been written.. Just a thought..

Comments are closed.