Fear of Blackness: Descriptions and Ethnogenesis of the original Afro-Arabian tribes of “Moorish” Spain By Dana Marniche

Spread the love
  • 2

Sinai Bedouins
Sinai Bedouins

Fear of Blackness: Descriptions and Ethnogenesis of the original Afro-Arabian tribes of “Moorish” Spain


“…a fair-skinned Arab is something inconceivable… “ Ibn Abd Rabbu of Cordoba born 9thc. in El Iqd el Farid (The Precious Necklace), quoting Shuraik el-Qadi a 7th century Arab of the clan of Nakha’l of the Maddhij in the Yemen.

“…the Arabs describe their color as black and they describe the color of the non-Arab Persians as red.” Assertion of the 13th c. grammarian Ibn Manzur or Mandhur in Lisaan al Arab, Vol. 4 (born in Tunis or Northern Egypt.)


“Red, in the speech of the people from Hejaz means fair-complexioned, and this color is rare amongst the Arabs. This is the meaning of the saying … a red man as if he is one of the slaves.” From Seyar A’laam al-Nubalaa, vol. 2, by the Syrian Al-Dhahabi (Thahabi),of the century 14th c. A.D.

The Book of Oaths (Kitab al Aiman)

Book 015, Number 4046:

Ayyub said: We were sitting in the company of Abu Musa that he called for food and it consisted of flesh of fowl. It was then that a person from Banu Tamim visited him. His complexion was red having the resemblance of a slave.

“…most Arabs are dark brown in color.” 13th c. Ibn Mandhur,

Lisaan al Vol. 4.

Yemeni Arab
Yemeni Arab

“Lank hair is the kind of hair that most non-Arab Persians and Romans have while kinky hair is the kind of hair that most Arabs have.” Lisaan al Arab, vol 3. Ibn Mandhur.

“All the lands became inhabited by Arabs completely mixed with non-Arabs.” Ahmed Amin in Fajr el Islam, 1975, p. 91.

The above quotes cited in The Unknown Arabs, Tariq Berry, published, 2002.


Batn – clan; literally meaning ‘from the belly of”

Ibn, bin, banu, beni – meaning “son of”

Harrah or el Harra the northwestern volcanic region of Arabia stretching from border of Jordan southward through region of Medina

Hejaz – western coastal region of Arabia stretching towards Yemen

Nejd – central Arabian land including Riyadh and Yemamah

Totemism – veneration of ancestral consciousness represented by animal names with cosmological significance and associations.

The Yemen – the southern part of the Arabian peninsula

The following treatise documents the tribes of Afro-Arabians descended from the original Arab-speaking occupants of the Arabian peninsula. In the early centuries after the birth of the Muslim Prophet Mohammed early European documents describe the Moors in such descriptive phrases as “black as melted pitch” or “black as burnt brands” as in the epic of Morien. It is more than likely the original Arab populations of Spain that gave rise to such exclamations as they are also often described as black or jet black by authors of Near Eastern derivation.

Although the Arabians were not the first to be called Moors, it was the color

of the people leaving the peninsula of Arabia that was mainly due the use of

the term “Moor” for black and woolly haired people in Spain, France, Italy and

other parts of Europe in Islamic times. When the Chanson de Roland which speaks

of the time of the Moorish battles in Gallic France speaks of “those hordes

and hordes blacker than the blackest ink – no shred of white on them except

their teeth…” it is no mere exaggeration. Anyone familiar with the Arabic writings

of the Syrian, Iraqi and Iranian historians up until the 14th century

knows that this is also their description of the early “pure” Arab clans of

the Arabian peninsula.

Therefore, the use of the term “Moor” in this article refers to the inhabitants of the Arabian peninsula who long after the time of Mohammed shared the appearance of Ethiopians and other sub-Saharan Africans, as well as customs of present day Africans stretching from the present country of Sudan to Somalia in the East to Mauritania, Mali and Nigeria in the West.

Arabian dialects, totemism, ancestral veneration, including knowing the genealogy of cattle and sheep back many generations (almost all early Arabian tribal names are also the names of their animals and have an astronomical reference), matrifocal societies (including worship of Goddesses), the wearing of cowry shells, nose rings, plaited and totemic hair-styles, ululations, hennaed limbs and scarred faces are all African-associated traits and customs most of which date back several thousand years into the Neolithic.

These are the facts of pre-Islamic and early Islamic Arabia, which is why the Greeks and Romans considered Arabia an extension of Ethiopia and for Syrians much of Arabia part of “the Sudan” long after the time of the prophet Muhammed. (See Richmond Palmer’s, Bornu, Sahara and Sudan with regard to the Syrian Al Omari). It was from this colony of “blacks” (as the original Arabs invariably called themselves), that the numerous tribes of the men Europeans once called “Moors” left after the time of the Muslim prophet to also spread over parts of the Middle East, North Africa and the Iberian peninsula.

Although Iranians had settled the Yemen or south of the peninsula in the centuries immediately preceding the Prophet Mohammed; though Turks, Circassians, mercenaries, concubines and slaves from all parts of he world had come to settle the land of the true Arabs later in Islamic times, large numbers of inidigenous peoples of African appearance still occupy the peninsula Arabia preserving their indigenous and original Afro-Arab customs.

Descriptions and Ethnogenesis of the Original Arabs:

The tribes leaving the north and central parts of Arabia occupying the Hejaz and Nejd can be divided into major branches. They include those traditional genealogy called “Ishmaelites” or descendants of Kedar, like the tribes of Qays ibn Ailan or El Nas and El Yas, and the Rabi’ah and Wa’il all based in the central regions of the peninsula. Many of these were “the Saracens” whom Ammianus Marcellinus, Roman general of the 4th c. A.D. claimed had originated “from the cataracts of the Nile” in Sudan.

It is the north and central group of Arabians inhabiting the Jordan, the Harra and the Nejd whose ancestors came to be called Ishmaelites, descendants of Thamud (the second A’d), Kedar and Naba’it (all traditionally children of Ismail). (The Nabataeans were among those known also as Amurru or Amorites in late Assyrian texts.)

In the tradition of Syria and in the later European Jewish or Rabbinic tradition the term “Kushi” signified black peoples, and in fact, became a derogatory term. A European Jewish Targum text Song 1:5 employs the phrase “as black as the Kushi who live in the tents of Kedar.”

Because many of the indigenous Arabian people of Jordan and Hejaz were near black in color and claim descent from the Kedar, Kinanniyya (Kana’ani or Cana’an), and Nabataeans (such as the modern Haweit’at), the Syrians and others who had come to adopt Arabic nationality (or who had been colonized by the Arabs), came to presume names such as Nabit, Kedar, Kanaan meant “black” people.

David Goldberg’s author of The Curse of Ham: Race and Slavery in Early Judaism, Christianity and Islam wrote “Dimashqi, who lists the Nabataeans (Nbt) among the descendants of Ham together with the Copts, the BrBr (Berbers) and the Sudan … and the Akkbar al Zaman, which lists the Nabit , among the children of Canaan… also said the word, ‘Nabit’ signifies ‘black’…” see p. 313 The 10th c. Al Masudi of Baghdad , is thought to have written the text, Akbar al Zaman. Al Dimashqi of Syria belonged to the 13th century.

In the southern part of Arabia the modern Qahtan Arabs’ are descendants of the peoples known mainly as Sabaeans, Himyarites, Ma’in and Azd (also called Asad, Zayyed or Sid) in Arab genealogy. These came to spread north and became the progenitors of many “Ismailites” . Thus, many groups have genealogies which make them both north Arabian descendants of Ismail and descendants of Qahtan through the Azdites (Zayyed) or Maddhij of Yemen, two descendants of Himyar and Kahlan sons of Saba. Most of the living Qahtan tribes told the European colonial ethnographers that they came in remote times from Africa. Thus, Bertram Thomas in 1929 said that the Shahara (Banu Shahr), Mahra or Maheyra, and Bautahara and Qarra or Kara had “a tradition of African origin” in “The Southeastern Borderlands of the Rub-al Khali”,in Geography Journal, Vol. 73, 3. These clans are also described as having a “dark pigmentation” and “fuzzy hair” as recently as 2001 (see David Philips, Peoples on the Move, pp. 250-251).

In 1872, a European named von Maltzan commenting on the inhabitants of southwest Arabia in Yemen said, “The inhabitants of this part of Arabia nearly all belong to the race of Himyar. Their complexion is almost as black as the Abyssinians,” see p. 121 in “Geography of Southern Arabia” by Baron von Maltzan, in Proceedings of the Royal Geographical Society of London, Vol. 16, No. 2 , pp. 115-123.

On the Qara of Hadramaut and Oman

who are said to descend from the Yemen, it was recently written, “European observers have made much of their physical resemblance to Somalis and Ethiopians…” P. 261 J. E. Peterson “Oman’s Diverse Society: Southern Oman”, Middle East Journal Vol. 38, No. 2 Spring 2004.

THE QAYS AILAN BIN MUDAR – DESCRIPTIONS AND SETTLEMENT IN SPAIN: The descriptions of the Qays clans families and individuals are many. To the Qays Ailan groups belonged the famous northern Arabian tribes of the Harra and Hejaz including the well-described children of Mansur (Mansour or Manas’ir) Sulaym bin Mansur, Mazin bin Mansur and Hawazin bin Mansour whose sub clans are in the dozens. The descendants Mansur bin Ikrima bin Khasafa bin Qays bin Ailan in Arabia, like most early Arabs in Arabia are referred to as black and dark brown in texts. Although they were famous for their slave raiding and use of Greco- Romans (Rum) concubines in ancient times, many clans, in fact, remain near black in color in the peninsula today.

The Iraqi Al Jahiz (9th c.) and Ibn Athir, the Kurd (12th -13th c.) both refer to the Sulaym bin Mansour in particular as “pure” Arabs and “black” in color, not simply dark brown which was also common in the Hejaz. Al Jahiz said that all the tribes of the Harra an area south of Jordan and extending into Hejaz were black like the lava and animals in the region.

Some Sulaym (Sulaym ibn Mansour bin Ikrima bin Khasafa) had settled in North Africa and entered Spain with the first governor of Andalusia, Abd el Azziz ibn Musa, and others also settled in Tudmir. But most of the clans of early settlers from the Qays tribes of Sulaym, Ghatafan, Fahm, Abs, and Dhubyan (Zubyan) of the Ghatafan or Ghutayf came later from Jazira in Mesopotamia where they had been settled for some time.

Ghatafan bin Sa’ad bin Qays Ailan, “settled the plain of Granada in a village called Ibra” in Spain, while the Abs of the Ghatafan (Abs bin Baghid bin Raith bin Ghatafan) settled in Jaen. (See bib. Taha, below) The closely related Banu Fezara (Fezara bin Dhubyan bin Raith) settled in Elvira where there was a section named for them. An early eyewitness upon seeing the Abs tribe in Arabia describes them as “black-skinned men shaking their spears and digging in the earth with their feet.” (From Ibn Abd Rabbu of Andalusia, El Iqd El Fareed, vol. 6, cited in The Unknown Arabs, p. 78). Both Ghutayf and Abs are originally known as batn or clans of the dark-skinned Murad of the Maddhij in Yemen according to original sources mentioned in, The Yemen in Early Islam, 1988.

The clans of Hawazin bin Mansour, like those of his brothers Sulaym and Mazin bin Mansour were also described in early Arabia. Among their modern remnants are the black and tall Dawasir of Yemamah and the “dark brown” Utayba (Oteiba or Ateibeh) and the lithe short “chocolate colored” Hamida of the Harb.

“A great number of Hawazin settled in Seville and Valencia” others settled in Elvira and Grenada. (see below, Taha, p. 135 The Muslim Conquest…)

Circa 1879, the famed British adventurer Sir Richard Burton describing the Hamida as a large clan of the Banu Salim bin Auf of Hejaz, Sir Richard Francis Burton describes the men as, “small chocolate colored beings, stunted and thin… with mops of bushy hair… straggling beards , vicious eyes, frowning brows … armed with scabbards slung over the shoulder and Janbiyyah daggers…” a people “of the great Hejazi tribe that has kept his blood pure for the last 13 centuries…” ( Burton in Personal Narrative of a Pilgrimage to el Medina and Mecca .p. 173 3rd edition William Mullen and Son.)

Concerning the Otaiba (also written Ateyba, Utaiba, Ateibe, etc.) a century ago, James Hamilton wrote , “they wore their hair in long curly plaits” and their skin was “a dark brown”. See pp. 129-130, Wanderings Around the Birthplace of Mohammed, published by R. Bentley, 1857.

Mazin bin Mansour’s descendants:

Clans of Khazraj and Aus based in Medina and the surrounding area are two tribes whose individuals are often described in Arabic texts because of their being the “companions” of the Prophet. When individuals of these tribes are described by non-Arabian writers, they are usually called ‘black- skinned” and “huge” or massive in stature making it likely this group originally from the Yemen belong to the remnants of the old Ubaid or Obeid stock of neolithic Arabia and Syria, whom are described as having unusually “large bodies” and “negroid” aspect by early anthropologists like Archibald Sayce. The Ubaid crania show they were a people that with long, wide and platyrrhine noses according to early physical anthropologists A. Sayce and others.

The Khazraj (Jazar or Gezer) and Aus (Uz) are the tribes from which came most of the Ansar or “companions” of Mohammed, the Prophet. One famous leader of the Ansar visiting the Byzantine ruled Egypt, Obadah bin Samit an aristocrat and chief of the Khazras or Khazaraj is described as “black” and by tradition was at least 8 ft tall, which may be an exaggeration of course, but then again may not have been. The famous Mohammed ibn Maslama of the Aus clan of al Ansar is also “tall, black-skinned, and huge.” By Ibn Saad (9th century Baghdad, Iraqi) in El-Tabaqat El Kubra vol. 3. (See Berry). While El Baladhuri (a 9th century Iranian ) also calls Nabtali ibn Harith from the Aus Ansar as tall, jet black and huge, with nappy hair”. See Tariq Berry’s book, The Unknown Arabs for more description of members of Aus and Khazraj.

Most of the “Medina al Ansar” settled in the region of Saragossa in Spain. (See below, Taha, p. 118) The Khazraj clan of Sa’d bin Abada settled in Qarabalan near Saragossa in Spain, while the Aramramma clan settled Sidonia and Cordoba and “later moved to Elvira, Grenada, Toledo, Tortua and Jerica in the province of Castellon.”


Muzar’s other descendants were the clans of Elyas of the southern Hejaz. When the tribes and individuals of the clans of Elyas are described, they are described in writings as “dark brown” or “black”. They were centered in Hejaz or western Arabia stretching southward toward the Yemen. The El Yas or Elias bin Muzir or Mudar was exemplified by the Kinaniyya or Kinana bin Khuzaima bin Mudrika bin Elyas (who became famously known as the Canaanites) from which came Mohammed’s tribe of the Qureish, and the tribes of Tamim bin Murra, Hudhail, Nadir, Mustaliq, Makhzumi and Zahra.

Elyasa or Elias included the famous Kinana who were described in European Talmudic texts as “black, thieving people” with “large male members”. Wah ibn Munabbih a 7th century descendant of Iranian mercenaries who had settled in the Yemen just before the period of Islam also made Cana’an “black”, being quite familiar with the Kinaaniyya tribe of Hejaz. The Banu Umayya who founded the Umayyad dynasty of Islam among the clans descended from tribes of Qureish founded the Umayyad dynasty.

Some Kinana or Kinaniyya who now live in Jericho today, the modern state of Israel are black, and many with the keenest features are jet black. (Some have tried to say they descend from Nubian slaves, which may be the case, but certainly not for the blacker ones.) The Quraish clan of the Kinaniyya were with Musa’s army (the first Arab governor in of Al-Andalus in Spain). Kinana also came to live in Jaen in Spain.

When individuals of the Qureish clan of the Kinana in Arabia – especially relatives of the Prophet are mentioned in texts they described as “black”. Ali, the son of the prophet’s cousin described as “black skinned” by the Turkish and Iranian writer el Suyuti and by Ibn Saad, a Baghdad, Iraqi of the 8th c. in El Tabaqat ael Kabra vol. 8. (cited in Berry). Ali’s great grandson according to Kitab el Aghani by Esfahani of Central Asia was “black skinned and huge”.

The black nationalistic views and horrifying racism of the original Arabs towards fair skinned peoples settling in Arabia is aptly illustrated by early writings and expressions from individuals of Mohammed’s own tribe in Arabia. Yazid ibn Muawia of the Omayya ibn Shams bin Abd Manaf of the Qureish tribe was “black skinned” and “hairy” and “kinky haired” according to Ibn Abd Rabbu 9th c. of Cordoba and el Dhahabi the Syrian of the 14th c. It was apparently Yazid’s father, Muawia, who said “I see these white folks have become very numerous and are saying bad things about those who have passed. I can envision a daring enterprise from them against the Arabs and authority. I am thinking of killing half of them and leaving half of them to set up markets and to build roads. Whats your opinion?” (This statement reported by Ibn Abd Rabbu, in El Iqd al Farid, vol 3. cited in The Unknown Arabs. P. 81)

The Zuhra clan of Qureish also settled Saragossa. (see Taha) A member of the Banu Zuhra in Arabia named Saad ibn Waqqas is called very dark, “tall” and “flat-nosed” by El Dhahabi, of Syria. While Jahiz of Iraq (9th.c.) calls him black-skinned and huge.

The tribe of Hudhail bin Mudrika bin El Yas settled Murcia and Saragossa. El Baladhuri, the 9th century Iranian, describing Abdella ibn Mas’ud, a famous member of the Hudhail clan of Arabians says he was “short, thin and black”. (p. 17, Tariq Berry). Tabikha was brother of Mudrika in the genealogy. When the Central Asian or Iranian writer Al Esfahan (from Esfahan in Iran) described an Arab of the clan of Tabikha and Banu Asad he described him as “black- skinned” with “black eyes”. According to Taha (p. 137, The Muslim Conquest…), Banu Asad bin Khuzaima bin Mudrika settled in al Bushra near the Sierra Nevada mountains and Barajila. The Unknown Arabs Tariq Berry, 2002. Available at Amazon.com

The Muslim Conquest and Settlement of North Africa and Spain, by Abdul Wahid Dhunan Taha, 1989.



Spread the love
  • 2

6 thoughts on “Fear of Blackness: Descriptions and Ethnogenesis of the original Afro-Arabian tribes of “Moorish” Spain By Dana Marniche”

  1. They’re not distancing themselves from blackness, more like distincting themselves from the negro race. Ask an arab ethiopian somali or any north african if they view themselves as descendents of negros and you will most like get a slap. Rasta

    1. There is not such a thing as the Negro race. It is a pure Euro-centric racist invention dating back to the 18C at the height of scientif racism.

      By doing so, racist Europeans wanted to dehumanize all Black Africans they came to enslave and colonize and whom they used to call Moors instead of Negroes.

      Until the 18C, Moor was a synonym for Negro, that is a Black African.

      As early as the 16C, the word negro was coined by Euro-slavers and applied to all their Black African slaves.

      The Spaniards and the Portuguese were the first Europeans to use the word Negro as part of an historical revenge against the Moors who ruled the Iberian peninsula and enslaved their ancestors for hundreds of years.

      In European countries with no history of Black slavery or Black colonies, they still use words very close to the word Moor for Black Africans (Poland and Greece are the best examples). Black Africans are called Mavro in Greece and Murzyn in Poland.

      Racist Europeans replaced the word Moor with Negro in a lame attempt to claim civilizations founded by powerful, noble and iconic Black Africans they intermixed and intermarried with in North and East Africa as well as the Saharan region for thousands of years.

      In addition, Europeans wanted to erase chapters of their history when they had Moorish lords, masters, icons, and rulers, including in Europe before the Roman empire, during the Roman Empire and after the Roman Empire.

      Please google King Maurus of Brittany, Saint Maurice, Patron Saint of the Holy Roman Empire, Prince Morineus, founder of Therouanne in France (All black Africans of higher status of yesteryear in Europe)

      Those Africans will always be remembered in the Moor’s head (Black African men and women on coats of arms and flags of European cities, dioceses and noble families).

      These Africans are called Hamitic (Caucasoids) SIC Africans who look different from other Africans like the Bantu, the pygmies or the San (Bushmen) because of their features.

      Many of the so called Hamitic Africans are mixed with Eurasians or West Asians; many more are not mixed at all. They have no Eurasians or West Asian ancestors as proven by numerous DNA studies.

      Europeans inherited their thin features from them and not the other way around. It is well established that white skin is a genetic mutation from brown skin.

      Let us go back to the word Moor.

      The term Moor was used since the Middle Ages for people with darker skin color, for example, historically for Ethiopians and Mauri and later generalized for BLACK AFRICANS.

      It is rarely used today, and – because of its colonial and racist partial use – often perceived as negative.

      The term Moor itself comes from the Greek mavros, mauros, meaning something like “black, dark, swarthy, dark-haired”. The Latin maurus/mauri was usually used for the Moors as a designation of origin (from the province of Mauretania and the Kingdom of Mauritania).

      It was not until the 16C, the word moor acquired the exclusive Mohr in German and other European languages meaning of a man with BLACK skin, while the Moor was henceforth referred to as such.

      As early as the 18th Century, the term “Moor” was then increasingly replaced by the term “nigger”, it was also here for the juxtaposition of noble Moor (pre-colonial idea), and primitive Negro (colonial idea).

      Ignoring the etymology of the word “moor” makes history effectively illiterate.

      Moor (n.)

      “North African, Berber,” late 14c., from O.Fr. More, from M.L. Morus, from L. Maurus “inhabitant of Mauritania” (northwest Africa, a region now corresponding to northern Algeria and Morocco), from Gk. Mauros, perhaps a native name, or else cognate with mauros “black”.

      Being a dark people in relation to Europeans, their name in the Middle Ages was a synonym for “Negro;” later (16c.-17c.) used indiscriminately of Muslims (Persians, Arabs, etc.) but especially those in India.

      The Moors (all Black Africans for ancient and medieval Europeans) are best remembered in Europe in the following traditions and expressions.

      1) The MOOR’s head: the head of A BLACK AFRICAN MAN OR WOMAN, as heraldic symbol;
      2) The MORETTI: artistic representations of BLACK AFRICANS (sculpture, jewels etc.;
      3) The MORCIC: a medieval jewel depicting a BLACK AFRICAN MAN dressed in oriental style, very popular in the Balkans;
      4) The MOORS and Christians dish: white rice and BLACK beans (the white for White Christendom and the black beans for BLACK AFRICAN MUSLIMS;
      5) The MOOR’s head color: DARK BROWN used in decorative arts;
      6) The MORESCA: a weapon dance during which the BLACK KING MORO, along with his black army, is challenged and defeated in a love triangle;
      7) MORLACHS : Nigri Latini or Black Latins;
      8) MORHENLAND: the name of Ethiopia for Germans of the Middle Ages;
      9) MOOR’s head cheese (cheese with BLACK crust), Moor’s head crystals (crystals with BLACK tips),
      10) MORENKOP: a stone head of a MOOR, or black skinned man, that hung above many pharmacies
      11) MOHRENKOPF( “Moor’s Head”): chocolate-coated marshmallow treat

      Old sayings and expressions

      Black as a Moor
      Black Madonna aka La Madonna Mora
      The Moor has done his duty, the Moor may go
      Saint Benedict, the Moor
      Alessandro di Medicis, Il Moro
      Othello, the Moor

  2. The banu kinanah of isreal is not same ishmaelite tribe of banu kinanah from which quraish descended from. The cannites the original inhabitants of isreal are called banu kinanah they are hamitic not semetic people.

    1. The Quraysh descend from the people who founded the Wadi Kenaunah area of southwestern Arabia. Wadhi Kenawnah means” lowland of the Kenaanah tribe”. They, like all the original Arabs, originated in the South of the Arabian peninsula. Ishmael in southern Arabian tradition is one of the Thamud as are Saleh (Shelah and other sons of Shem) who began moving northward probably between 1500 and 1000 B.C. into Syria carrying their native names with them. At that time however they were mostly known as Melukhha or Amalekites. Hamites, Semites and Japhetites are all the same people in early Arabic tradition who spread north from the Yemen. Japhet’s sons spread across Africa where they named the Atlas that is why Daris or Teras became the ancestor of the Berbers including Javan. Others spread into the Aegean and north to become the ancestors of the Meds and other black Scythic peoples mentioned in Medieval Muslim texts “as sons of Ham”. That is why Josephus speaks of the children of Noah as the original inhabitants of those places. The descendants of Cathim or Khethim the Amalekite spread across the coasts of the Mediterranean as Josephus states and founded the places in Cyprus and Crete and Mycenae (in the Hyksos period). While in north Africa they became the Ukatameni or Ketama people otherwise known as Sanhaja. That is the history the Afro-asiatics from the Arabian peninsula and Africa tell whether true or not. Unfortunately Eurasiatics i.e. the Iranians (Scythians in Persia), Syrians (“white Syrians” as opposed to Phoenicians i.e. Amalekites and other Canaanites) and Europeans in general began to write themselves into the Afro-Asiatic allegory of Noah or Nu inventing a northern origin of Canaanites, a northern Ur of the Chaldees in Turkey somewhere, a northern Noah and his ark, when in fact such names as “Chaldean” only refer to the tribe of Banu Khalid and Khasdim from the Hashid. When the tribes of historical Kush and Ad moved northward from Saba they carried their ancient native totemic tribal names and placed names with them all related to the stars and planets and at the same time various animals. That is why you find at least 3 gardens of Eden with the rivers and the same stories and allegories and myths all over the Middle East and in fact world. That is why you also find the modern Kinaaniyya tribes in the modern Israel who actually originated further south in the Yemen and Tihama with the original Israel and Canaanites mentioned in the Hebrew Pentateuch or first 5 books of the Bible. Lastly, it is also why you find almost all of the names of the tribes of the Biblical Edom and Canaan living TODAY among the Azd or Kahlan descended people in southern Arabia between the Yemamah in the Nejd and the Eritraean Sea still mostly black as ever. The name for Yemamah is still named Falaj al Aflaj (Channel of the Pelegites) named after their ancient king Falaj or Peleg the king of the region to who divided up the earth i.e. soil with channels.

  3. Regarding your use of the word “EUROPEAN RABBINIC JEWISH tradition” I have to make this clear. The Talmud was NEVER AND WILL NEVER BE European. I am assuming you are speaking of commentary and texts written by those White Jews/Ashkenazim or even some of the so-called “Sephardim” Whites.

    It’s funny to me to see them behave like such coons with all their anti-blackness, when the Talmud makes no derogatrory statements about being “black” or “brown” as we see it today. In fact, the Talmud states that both Shem and Ham were very dark skinned. It says that Ham was “black and lovely” If I remember correctly.

    When I read THIS: “David Goldberg’s author of The Curse of Ham: Race and Slavery in Early Judaism, Christianity and Islam wrote “Dimashqi, who lists the Nabataeans (Nbt) among the descendants of Ham together with the Copts, the BrBr (Berbers) and the Sudan”

    I see what the PROBLEM is, and the PROBLEM IS WHITE PEOPLE.. The Problem is GOLDBERG injected “Race” and a NON-EXISTENT “Curse of Ham” where it absolutely never existed. There was no “Race” in early Judaism or Early Christianity or Early Islam. Ham was never Cursed, his son Canaan was and that was by Noah, not the creator. Racism (White Supremacy) and that concept of RACE did not exist until after 1492 When Europeans began classifying themselves as White and decided to unite to wage war upon the non-white MAJORITY on the planet.

    The White Turks brought it south into Africa and Mesopotamian areas with them and the Europeans did the same Everywhere else. I suspect that Mr. GoldBERG is also a White person and a White Supremacist. You have to be careful reading the things that White people write on Judaism and the Hebrew Scriptures. They often inject “Racism” and anti-blackness where it never existed in the first place.

  4. I had to respond to this nonsense as well – “I see what the PROBLEM is, and the PROBLEM IS WHITE PEOPLE.. The Problem is GOLDBERG injected “Race” and a NON-EXISTENT “Curse of Ham” where it absolutely never existed. There was no “Race” in early Judaism or Early Christianity or Early Islam. ”

    Actually I see what “the problem” is too. A lot of black Americans are too lazy to read and when they do they can’t read for context! Actually I’m suspecting you didn’t even bother to read the book Goldenberg wrote or you wouldn’t have made the above statement. The book is IN FACT about the fact that race was injected later into Judaism and Islam LIKE YOU SAID. Creating lies and generic insults for “white people” FOR NOTHING only serves to show how low and desperate many black people will go to prove they are worthy of something. It only makes you look overly-sensitive, IRRATIONAL cowardly, foolish, and angry “plantation Negro”. Stick to the high ground so that people can take you seriously.
    ; )

    Its not white people that have made you face your own karma, though they may have been the vehicle of it. Just remember that. And be grateful the truth is now being allowed to come out again.

    Thankfully I first learned by looking at “white people’s” books like The Curse of Ham by Goldenberg that Nabit and Kedar were synonym for blackness, and from a white Arab’s book (if there is such a thing) that according to the 10th century Ibn Nadim ” during his time” stated “that the Nabataeans were people ‘with black complexion’,…” from Inscriptional Evidence of Pre-Islamic Classical Arabic: Selected Readings in Akkadian, Musnad and Akkadian Inscriptions. Blautopf Publishing 2013


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *