Top 100 AIDS Science Inconsistencies

Spread the love

All of the observations below can be substantiated by independent research. How long can the HIV=AIDS=Death dogma be maintained in the face of so many scientific cracks?

1. AIDS occurs in the absense of HIV (65, 87), a new medical definition (Idiopathic CD4+ T-cell lymphocytopenia) was therefore created.

2. HIV does not satisfy Koch’s postulates, the criteria that must be met in order to prove that a microbe causes a disease (90)

3. Anti-HIV drugs, including protease inhibitors, destroy T-cells (4-10)

4. Septrin (also called Septra, Bactrim, Co-trimoxazole) and anti-HIV drugs destroy mitochondria (11,12)

5. The PCP (Pneumocystis Carinii pneumonia) fungus becomes resistant to Septrin (12)

6. Recreational drugs (heroin, poppers, crystal met, ecstasy, cocaine) reduce CD4 cell numbers (13-18, 58, 66-68)

7. HIV positive patients recover after they stop taking drugs (58)

8. Recreational drugs cause AIDS-defining diseases (see table 7 of 58)

9. Anti-HIV drugs cause AIDS-defining diseases (58)

10. Anti-HIV drugs inhibit human enzymes (11)

11. HIV positive Africans in dire poverty in Uganda and no access to anti-HIV drugs lived as long as HIV positives in the West who took anti-HIV drugs (33)

12. There are no comparative studies of survival in HIV negatives and combo-free HIV positive heterosexuals with no other risk factors.

13. Only 38% of healthy long-term positives had ever used AZT or other nuleoside analogs compared with 94% of progressors (80)

14. Decreases in AIDS cases preceded the introduction of new drug treatments (Dec 1995) by three full years (see fig. 6 of 106)

15. Anti-HIV drugs have anti-microbial effects (49, 50, 10)

16. The introduction of AZT did not cause a decline in the AIDS death rate (105)

17. In the only long term trial of AZT (The Concorde study) 172 participants died, 169 while taking AZT, 3 while on placebo (51)

18. Nucleoside analog drugs suppress/destroy the bone marrow where all immune system cells are born (26, 32, 111)

19. HIV+ children born to AZT treated mothers had a higher probability of developing severe disease or severe immunsuppression (53)

20. “Drug holidays” recover immune responses

21. AZT caused the same transient increase in CD4 count in HIV negatives as in HIV positives (55)

22. There are no controlled studies showing that AIDS occurs in the absense of all other possible non-HIV causal factors.

23. Long-living, healthy, drug-free HIV positives are mostly ignored by AIDS researchers

24. Apart from the early (fraudulent) AZT studies and the Concorde study no efficacy studies compare drugs with placebo

25. There are well documented, non-HIV causes for every AIDS disease

26. The incidence of AIDS-defining diseases among Western non-drug users has not been shown to exceed national backgrounds (58)

27. Early AIDS coincided with the cumulative effects of unprecedented, intense use of volatile nitrite (poppers) as a aphrodisiac marketed almost exclusively to homosexuals (102)

28. AIDS can be treated effectively without anti-HIV drugs (39-42, 112)

29. On average viral load overestimates infectious HIV by a factor of 60,000 (21)

30. Even a PCR method that can detect 1 infected cell in 100000 found very little HIV DNA in HIV positives (23)

31. HIV could not be cultured from people with a detectable viral load (19, 21)

32. HIV has never been properly isolated (20)

33. After many billions of dollars of research effort over 20 years, HIV scientists still cannot explain how HIV causes AIDS.

34. After many billions of dollars of research effort over 20 years there is no vaccine and no cure, there are only toxic drugs

35. There was no increase in HIV seroprevalence outside risk groups in the UK despite record STD rates and teenage pregnancy rates (25)

36. HIV DNA was found to be constant from the time of seroconversion but CD4 count continually went down (29)

37. CD4 count goes down and viral load goes up while on the anti-HIV drugs.

38. AZT is hardly triphosphorylated by the body so it cannot possibly have an anti-HIV effect (30)

39. AZT has no effect on HIV DNA but makes viral load (HIV RNA) go down (31)

40. Research throughout the 1970s showed that retroviruses do not kill cells.

41. The probability of heterosexual transmission of HIV was found to be very low (1 in a 1000 for male to female and 8 times less likely for female to male) (34)

42. HIV antibody tests can give repeated false positives and seroreversions can occur (95-100, 114-116)

43. HIV tests are sensitive to non-specific antibody binding

44. HIV tests involve an arbitrary dilution factor, everyone tests positive (because of non-specific antibody binding) if their serum is undiluted (104)

45. All the proteins used in the HIV test are associated with retroviral genes that are found naturally (endogenous) in all humans (72)

46. Endogenous retroviruses can generate immune responses in humans (73, 74)

47. None of the HIV proteins tested for have been proven to belong to HIV (75)

48. There are over 60 different conditions, including pregnancy, that have been known to generate false positives on the HIV test (91)

49. The Elisa, Western Blot and PCR tests for HIV all carry disclaimers nullifying their detection of HIV

50. The criteria for HIV-positivity used in the antibody tests varies between countries and between organisations within a country and can produce indeterminate (neither positive or negative) results (75, 109)

The Western Blot HIV test, widely regarded as the most accurate, is not used in England and Wales because it is regarded as inaccurate.51. The viral load PCR primers were found to be non-specific for “HIV” genetic sequences (35)

52. The viral load test gives false negatives (36)

53. The viral load test gives false positives (36, 113)

54. The viral load test has low reproducibility (36-38)

55. Direct measurements showed no correlation between viral load and CD4 count (43)

56. Many conditions cause reduced CD4 counts (86)

57. CD4 counts between 200 and 300 have been observed in healthy HIV negatives (87)

58. There are no studies comparing CD4 cell variations in combo-free HIV positives (with no risk factors) and HIV negatives.

59. According to the AIDS establishment, a heterosexual AIDS “epidemic” of African origin started off in the West as a homosexual “epidemic”

60. In 1985 HIV incidence in Southern Africa was confined to homosexuals who had been to the US and those who had had sex with them (88, 89).

61. The USA was found to be the world’s most sexually promiscuous nation (27)

62. Condoms (made from polyisoprene) have holes in much larger than HIV (28, 110)

63. Reducing STD incidence in Africa did not reduce the rate of HIV seroconversion* (101)

64. Only a minute proportion of Africans have actually been tested for HIV, seroprevalence estimates are derived from extrapolations based on unrepresentative samples from maternity clinics.

65. In Africa a single positive ELISA test or even a single “rapid” (saliva/urine) test is considered proof of HIV infection, “proof” in the developed world requires a series of tests

66. HIV seroprevalence was found to be much lower in South African prisons than in the general population (1)

67. The vast majority of African “AIDS patients” tested HIV negative (44, 45)

68. In “AIDS ravaged” Zambia since 1980 the population has increased and even the rate of increase in population has increased! (46)

69. In “AIDS ravaged” South Africa many coffin makers are either doing a slack trade or have gone out of business (47)

70. The total number of AIDS cases in Africa consists almost entirely of estimated cases rather than known, registered cases (54)

71. PCP is the typical AIDS defining disease in Western adults but it is almost entirely confined to young children in Africa (2,3)

72. There is no Western heterosexual AIDS epidemic

73. IVDUs who consistently used a clean needle exchange program were 10.2 to 22.9 times MORE likely to test HIV positive than non-users (48)

74. Non-human primates “progress” to AIDS (SAIDS) much quicker than humans do (107)

75. SIV does not cause SAIDS in wild primate populations (108)

76. SIV seroprevalence is too low in wild primate populations to account for SIV resistance in these populations (22)

77. SIV seroprevalence in captive SIV naïve primate populations was found to be very low (22)

78. Until the early 1930s many thousands of European men received transplants from chimpanzees and did not get AIDS (62)

79. Uganda study showed HIV-positivity did not indicate a new cause of disease, only decreased mortality in HIV negatives (52)

80. One thousand medical staff a year accidentally contract hepatitis from needles yet by 1998 there were no documented cases of surgeons or emergency medical technicians/paramedics getting AIDS, or even HIV, from occupational exposure (58, Table 16 of 106)

81. All AIDS patients have lowered levels of glutathione, the major water soluble intracellular antioxidant (59, 60)

82. The antioxidant N-acetyl cysteine inhibits “HIV replication” (61)

83. Reactive oxygen species are implicated in the induction of HIV expression and cell death (40)

84. Treatment with oxidising, mitogenic*** agents is necessary for HIV “isolation” from cell culture (56, 57)

85. Significant HIV replication was found to follow rather than precede AIDS defining disease (94)

86. Low T-cell counts were shown to occur before HIV seroconversion and to predict seroconversion (92, 93)

87. HIV-like genetic sequences have been found in the HIV negative human genome (63)

88. Epitopes** of HIV regulatory proteins tat, rev and nef are expressed in normal human tissue (71, 116)

89. Toxic intracellular stresses can create novel genetic sequences (64)

90. HIV showed over 40% variation in an essential gene (protease) sequence within a single subtype (103)

91. Foreign protein transfusions were found to be immune suppressive (79, 81, 84, 85)

92. Hemophiliacs can have hypergammaglobulinaemia which can cause false HIV positive test results (69)

93. Up to 99.9% of HIV genomes in plasma may be defective (70)

94. Mortality in hemophiliacs began to increase in exactly the same year they began taking AZT (81, 82)

95. The AIDS risk of hemophiliacs on AZT was 4.5 times higher, and mortality 2.4 times higher, than untreated controls (83) 96. Infectious HIV (a delicate virus) does not survive the Factor VIII preparation process (76-78)

97. HIV theorists have made incorrect predictions throughout the HIV era.

98. Corticosteroids and endogenous cortisol suppress cellular immune responses and cortisol destroys immature T-cells (24)

99. Effective cellular immunity relies upon nitric oxide gas defence, see for example Eur. J. Immunol. 2002, 32(5):1455-63

100. AIDS spreads non-exponentially, unlike infectious disease (58)

By John Kirkham

16th January 2003


(2) American J of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 1994, 149(6):1591-1596
(3) Central African J of Medicine 1999, 45:127-8
(4) J Virol 2002, 76(12):5966-73
(5) J Biol Chem 1989, 264:6127-33
(6) Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 1990, 34:637-641
(7) Antiviral Chemistry and Chemotherapy 1991, 2:125-132
(8) AIDS 1989, 3:417-422
(9) NEJM 1987, 317:192-197
(10) Physicians Desk Reference 1999
(11) Nature Medicine 1995, 1(5):417-422
(13) Pharmacotherapy 1984, 4:284-291
(14) Cancer Research 1983, 43:1365-1371
(15) Lancet 1982, Feb 20, 412-416
(16) AIDS 1991, 5:35-41
(17) Annals NY Acad. Sci. 1987, 496:711-21
(18) Life Sciences 2001,69:2931-2941
(19) NEJM 1995, 332:201-208
(20) Virol. 1997, 230:125-133
(21) Science 1993, 259:1749-1754
(23) J Virol 1990, 64: 864-872
(24) Medical Hypothesis 1996, 46:551-555
(25) The Times (UK) June 2nd 2001
(26) Adverse Drug Reaction Bulletin 1996, 178:675-8.
(27) Durex Global Sex Survey 2001, see also
(28) Rubber Chemistry and Technology, 1989, 62(4):683-697 (see page 692)
(29) J. AIDS 1994, 7:381-388
(30) Current Medical Research and Opinion 1999, Vol. 15, supplement 1
(31) J. AIDS 1991, 4:766-9
(32) See manufacturers insert at look under heading Bone Marrow Suppression.
(34) American J. Epidemiology 1997, 146(4):350-357
(35) AIDS 1998, 12:2076-2077
(36) Annals of Internal Medicine 1996, 124:803-815
(37) J. of AIDS and Human Retrovirology 1997, 15(2):174-5
(38) J. AIDS 1992, 5(9):872-877
(39) Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 1997, 94:1967-1972
(40) Medical Hypothesis 1993, 40(2):85-92
(41) Trans. Assoc. Am. Phys. 1984, 97:70-79
(42) Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 1997, 216:201-210
(43) Nature Medicine 1999, 5(1):83-89 (see fig. 4b)
(44) J. AIDS 1994, 7(8):876-877
(45) Lancet 1992, 340:971-972
(48) American J. Epidemiology 1997, 146(12):994-1002 (see table 5)
(49) J. of Infectious Diseases 2000, 181:1629-1634
(50) J. of Infectious Diseases 1999, 180:448-453
(51) Lancet 1994, 343:871-881
(52) Lancet 1994, 343:1021-1023
(53) AIDS 1999, 13(8):927-33
(54) See tabulated data in the annex to the WHO Global Report 1998
(55) AIDS 1996, 10(12):1444-5
(56) Science 1986, 231:850-853
(57) Nature 1986, 319:10-11
(58) Genetica 1998, 104:85-132
(59) FASEB J. 1997, 11:1077-1089
(60) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1997, 94:1967-1972
(61) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1991, 88:986-990
(62) Hamilton D. The Monkey Gland Affair, Chatto and Windus Ltd., London 1986
(63) J. Virol. 1992, 66:2170-2179
(64) Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol. 1992, 6(3):330-335
(65) Biotechnology 1993, 11:955-956
(66) AIDS 1987, 1:105-111
(67) American J. Epidemiology 1993, 137(9):989-1000
(68) Clin. Immunol. Immunopathol. 1994, 70:245-250
(69) Isr. J. Med. Sci. 1991, 27:557-561
(70) Nature 1993, 364:291
(71) Am. J. Pathol. 1992, 141:1209-1216
(72) JAMA 1988, 260(5):674-679
(73) Immunological Reviews 1996, 152:193-236
(74) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1996, 93:5177-5184
(75) Biotechnology 1993, 11:696-707
(76) CDC Fact sheet on HIV transmission January, 1994
(77) JAMA 1989, 261:1275
(78) J. AIDS 1992, 5:822-828
(79) Ann. Int. Med. 1985, 103:723-726
(80) AIDS 1994, 8:1123
(81) Genetica 1995, 95:51-70
(82) Lancet 1995, 346:1371-1372
(83) Lancet 1994, 344:791-792, see table on page 791
(84) NEJM 1984, 322:941-949
(85) Am. J. Hematol. 1985, 20:1-6
(86) News-Gap
(87) J. Antimicrobial Therapy 1996, 37(Suppl. B):171-83
(88) S. Afr. Med. J. 1985, 68(8):617-8
(89) NEJM 1985 312(19):1257-8
(90) See “full text” at The Durban Declaration
(92) J. AIDS 1993, 6:820-822
(93) Epidemiology 1990, 1:453-459
(94) Journal of Infectious Diseases 1996, 174:401-3
(95) Annals of Internal Medicine 1988, 108:785-90
(96) Annals of Internal Medicine 1985, 103:545-7
(97) AIDS 1992, 6:1547-48
(98) JAMA 1992, 268(8):1015-1017
(99) Lancet 1992; 339:1548
(100) Lancet 1993, 342:1458-1459
(101) Lancet 1999, 353:525-535
(102) Kitzerow M. The AIDS Indictment, MRKCO Publishing, Chicago, 2000. See
(103) Nature Medicine 1996, 4(7):753-759
(106) CDC HIV/AIDS Surveillance Report, Year-end 1997 (Vol. 9 No. 2)
(107) Science 1990, 248:1109-1112
(108) J. Virol. 2001, 75:2262-2275
(109) The Perth Group, Mother to Child Transmission of HIV and its Prevention with AZT and Nevirapine, ISBN 1876763728, page 5.
(114) Absts Ist National Conf. Human Retroviruses. Abst. 1993, #86, p. 71.
(116) NEJM 1988, 319:961-964


*Conversion from HIV negative to HIV positive
**Epitopes are part of a molecule against which antibodies are made
***Stimulates cell division

Spread the love

5 thoughts on “Top 100 AIDS Science Inconsistencies”

  1. … seem to be having the same train of thoughts humanity is waking up!
    The Goddess is Rising and she is not pleased, in fact she is furious!! What’s that most universal of all laws? what goes around comes around…..with a vengeance


    THE IDEA that AMBUSH cures AIDS
    is being proven by the more than 400 individuals who have taken a dose of 60 ml three times daily for 21 days. The result is that AMBUSH ‘KILLS’ the virus by causing the protein envelope to rupture and the viral particles are discarded by the white blood cells. AMBUSH is able to ‘KILL’ the virus that are ‘hiding’ in the lymph system by its ‘natural radioactive’ properties. This process allows the body to ‘return to normal health’ with a corresponding immunity to that or those strains of the virus.

    What is AMBUSH ?
    AMBUSH is a radioactive isotope of uranium that is found in the ‘palm’ plant of which there are more than 3000 species. When ingested, AMBUSH causes the body temperature in the trunk area to rise to about 102 degrees when the individual is sleeping. The preparation takes four hours per batch, which is then given to the individuals for consumption 60 ml three times daily for 21 days. AMBUSH is a herbal preparation in this form but it contains an active ingredient which is a ‘NEW’ crystalline substance, a drug from the ‘palm plant’ similarly to ASPIRIN originating from the willow tree bark

    After 21 days on AMBUSH, ALL the individuals experienced a decrease in viral load to undetectable, an increase in cd4, increase in RBC, an improvement in general health such as more color to the face, decrease in Buffalo hump, an increase in gluteal muscles, a decrease to having no joint pains whereby individuals can bend to touch their toes, and walk up steps are but a few examples. There is also a dramatic increase in their sexual appetite beginning after the first week of therapy

    In any plant concoction such as percolated ‘tea’, there are 30-40,000 compounds, whi ch would take the scientific community twenty years to isolate one particular ingredient if they knew what they were looking for. The LORD GOD has given me seven steps to isolate the active ingredient, which is soft and metallic in nature and has a carbon- uranium-sulfur-(classified)-phentolamine configuration or structure. This is similar to Federick Kekule and the discovery of the benzene ring where he dreamt the structure.

    As an antiviral and ‘natural radioactivity’ producing agent, AMBUSH is also effective against leukemia, lupus and HPV. Here I am saying that I have ‘GIVEN’ AMBUSH in the same ‘strength’ and dosage to patients with leukemia, lupus and HPV. A 35 year old male with HIV found it difficult to impossible to urinate was put on ‘green tea’ and water while the doctors contemplated prostrate surgery. One of the doctors gave him my number , I sent him a supply of AMBUSH an d he has not been given any more ARV’s, since taking AMBUSH 18 months ago, is in ‘good’ health and has expressed a willingness to be examined by HIV investigators like many others who have taken AMBUSH.

    I have sent this ‘IDEA’ to most HIV research agencies, scientist of the field, universities, hospitals, clinics, politicians and news agencies to which it is REJECTED because the name of THE LORD GOD is mentioned. He has steered me scientifically through the processes such as which plant and how to produce the active ingredient. What are the odds of a Florida Pharmacist picking a plant would contain the CURE for HIV/AIDS ?
    I have never charged any of the people for their supply of AMBUSH but a life saving has been spent on the project with NO renumeration from any sources because AMBUSH falls outside the walls of modern medicine and research.


    My proposal is that I PROVE that AMBUSH CURES HIV/AIDS by giving it to a number of END-STAGE or DRUG-RESISTANT people and the scientific community watches their recovery. This proposal addresses the problem in that I have already outlaid the results to be obtained.

    This IDEA is unconventional in that the scientific community has rejected AMBUSH because I say it is GOD given. Secondly if I wrote it according to certain standards, then it might be peer reviewed. However, THE LORD GOD has also shown me that there are five enzyme systems associated with the virus, reverse transcriptase, protease, fusion and two more of which causes the virus to be AIRBOURNE. This means that without DIVINE intervention mankind and ALL warm- blooded mammals will be extinct in a number of years.

    The PROOF of what I am saying is found in scientific papers wherein it is found that when the protease cuts the viral strands, it cuts it at DIFFERENT lengths EVERY time, to which it should always be a valine at the end but is a different amino acid every time. This is why it is IMPOSSIBLE to produce a VACCINE.

    Since this is NOT a hypothesis but there are about 400 individuals who have taken AMBUSH, here lies a vast area in which to check, recheck and confirm that AMBUSH CURES AIDS. Let it be mentioned that during the HIV reproductive cycle, reverse transcriptase converts viral RNA into DNA compatible to human genetic materials. Thus the human DNA has been ‘hijacked’ and since each person has a DIFFERENT DNA, then the new viral copy is unique to that person which shows that each individual has a DIFFERENT STRAIN of the virus. Consider two HIV positive people swapping viral strains and increasing its complexity with multiple partners.
    It can also be proposed that they be revisited as proof that the strain or strains that they had were ‘killed’ at the time of taking AMBUSH considering that a person can catch as many different strains as there are people who are infected by HIV.
    I am also willing to work with the scientific community in identifying those individuals who took AMBUSH and wish to be identified with this process notwithstanding that some are stigmatized while others are jubilant,

    Once AMBUSH is verified as being able to accomplish that which is aforementioned then the next stage might be the natural and artificial synthesis of the substance.

    Finally, if this is accepted or not, believed or not, THE LORD GOD always wins and this is the heavenly truth to which AMBUSH was divinely given to mankind for the CURE of HIV/AIDS and it will be here forever. Apostle Shada Mishe.


  3. alot of those quotes are taken out of context and are being presented in a misleading manner.

Comments are closed.