The ancient Celts and Vikings were Black people – By Dr Clyde Winters

Spread the love
  • 31.8K
    Shares

The ancient Celts and Vikings were Black people.

The Celts were originally Black people. Ephorus (c. 405BC) claimed that the Celts were Blacks or Ethiopians(1)The Celts continued to be recognized as Blacks by Tacitus, who wrote about the Black Celts and Picts in 80 AD .(2)

The Celts on the mainland of Europe were called Iberians or Silures.(3)though the original Celts were Black, overtime their name was stolen by Europeans. Father O’Growney has discussed the history of the Celts. He makes it clear that the original Celts were the Iberians.(4)

The Iberians were probably conquered by the Ligurians.(5) It is suggested that the Ligurians may be represented by the modern Basque of Spain.(6) The Ligurians took the name Celt.

The Ligurians/Celts were conquered by the Gaulish speaking people. The Gauls conqered the Ligurians and pushed them into Spain. It was these Gauls who imposed their language on the Iberian and Ligurian Celts .

The Gauls were Belgians according to Father O’Growney. The Irish and Welsh are descendants of these Gauls.(7) These Gauls spoke Gaulish or Gaelic.(8)

The Germans conquered the Gaulish-Celts, and Gaulish disappeared around 4th Century AD.

All of the Black Celts in Britain were not erased by the Gauls.

This is supported by the Ivory Lady of York ,England. The reconstruction of the face of the Ivory Bangle Lady (c.350AD) indicates that she was African or Black.

This woman was rich and indicates the African type common to the Bristish Isles.She was highly respected by her white subjects.

There is genetic and linguistic evidence that proves that the Celts were Black or African people. An examination of the language spoke by the Basque has a Niger-Congo substratum. C.J.K. Cambell-Dunn has found a Niger-Congo substratum in Basque .(9)

Dr. Cambell-Dunn found that the Niger-Congo and Basque languages share personal pronouns, numerals and vocabulary items.

There is also genetic evidence linking the Basque and Niger-Congo speakers. Both groups share SRY10831.1, YAP, M2,M173(xR1a,R1b3), E3*-P2, E3b2-M81 . (10)This linguistic and genetic evidence supports the African origin of the Celts.

The original Danes or Vikings were Blacks . (11)This is made clear in the Oseberg 8th Century Vikings on the Norway Sledge carving of the Black seafarers that populated the region at this time. It is clear from this carving that the 8th Century Vikings were different from the Blond, big bodied folk of Viking legends.

References:

1. William and Robert Chambers, Chambers Information for the people, Vol. 2 ,(London & Ediburgh,1884) p.66.

2 J.A. Rogers, Sex and race, Vol.1 (New York, 1967) p.196.

3. Ibid, p.196.

4. Father O’Growney, The Celts, American Ecclesiastical Review, (1901) pp.350359.

5. Ibid, p.352.

6. Ibid., p.353.

7. Ibid., p.352.

8. Ibid., p.353.

9. C.J.K. Cambell-Dunn, Basque as Niger Congo. Retrieved 8/28/2010 at http://home.clear.net.nz/page/gc_dunn/Basque_as_Niger-Congo.html

10. Alonso S, Flores C, Cabera V. The place of Basque in the European y-Chromosome diversity landscape, European Journal of Human Genetics, (2005) 13:pp.1293-1302.

11. W.B., The Doctrine of Celtism, Notes and Queries, (1871) 7: p.8.

Here are more sources via Google Book:

Black celts

The Europeans make it clear that the early Welsh were Black Celts. They were a small black race that came to Britain from Iberia. They were forced off the mainland by whites.

T.R. (1890). The Gael at Bala. Bye-Gones, 26 Feb, pp.320-321. Black Celts

Dr. Masson reported on the Highlanders of Canada. He said they were of the descendants Black Celts. Dr, Masson made it clear these Highlanders spoke Caelic and had African faces. Black Celts 2

Dr. Masson. (1875). “The Gael of the Far West”, The Academy, Oct.30, pg.451. Black Celts 3

William Chamers , in Information for the people, said the Celts were descendants of Blacks who mixed with invading white tribes.Chambers said these Celts were Northern Ethiopians. Black Celts 4

Black Celts 5

Black Celts 6

Europeans also make it clear that the Danes were Blacks.

Black Danes


Spread the love
  • 31.8K
    Shares

176 thoughts on “The ancient Celts and Vikings were Black people – By Dr Clyde Winters”

  1. This absurd notion is not supported by ANY credible scientist anywhere.
    For gods sake take your own history and writa about it, leave us (whites) alone.

    1. Omg! You white people stole our history.From day one YOU PEOPLE stold everything.We blacks are in Gods image moreso than you whites. There is not a white blone haired blue eyed Jesus that came from Africa. Give me a break. See, if you want to talk facts; lets get down to it. Just look at you white reptilian incompleted bodies. Every day I thank God I’m black. You know, I have cross into the white schools and the so called white sports and I now know why You People got the whole wold against us.You all have been taught by US blacks on how to live civilized. We taught you how separate animals from the household. Yes, you cannot sleep with your livestock. We taught you reading , math and so on. We even taught you white people how to swim. To all you white people you know what I’m talking about. Yes, oh wait don’t get mad .Read about the Moores. Read about Kevin Dawson and Bruce wigo. “The African Swimming Tradition. Whites could not swim black did until we were brought to this country You People stole. We are tropical. YouPeople are cold climates dweller. I can go on and on and on. Your physical and mental is naturally undeveloped compaired to blacks. You People age quicker than any other race. You people have sex with your animals and spead disease all over the globe. You people still countries.
      You People need drug inhancemet to keep up. In you schools you have tutor galour and cheat on tests. You pay top dallors to get exams that you didn’t do. You people have other people sit in to take your entrance exam get into top schools. You what the world to think you are smart.YouPeople are the three fifth of man. The word Human means, lets break it down hue is color which You People don’t have. So you are not human. You People are mankind. Meaning you are some kind of a man. Now , YouPeople want to depopulate the world as you put it .Bildaber and Googleber crap . Do us world a favor be the first to go.Dang I’m so glad I’m not white. Praise the Lord!! 🙂

  2. This is ridiculous why do you need to steal other cultures identaty? Vikings were black? Bullshit.. they have been described in many ancient text including a famous Arab ambassador as large white bodied people and the Romans described the celts as the same. These black supremacy ideas are as scientificly flawed and just as racist as any white supremest.. And if all man kind did originate out of Africa that does not mean they had to be black… Or white who knows what color they were and who cares… There is a theory that skin color is an adaption to ones climate over long periods of time warmer climate darker skinned people ect.

    1. Roman describe celts as different people not as black but pale and reddish hair while romans have black hair and big eyes and olive skin.

    2. Y is it so hard you to believe that. What makes an ambassador evidence nor valid then a geneticists. Evidence every word that they put in a history book about white people and how they were these great people is true they were rapist thieves pillagers and murderers too.

  3. Your comments are based on belief–not fact. History depends on sources. You are racist. If the sources claim the population was Black, this is not black supremacy–it is based or historical records. Your racist heart does not allow you to accept the truth.

    You have not read this material. Many Indo-Europeans that came to the Black lands were allowed to settle among the Blacks. It is clear that Indo-European people adopted the names of Black tribes after they were ‘adopted’ by the Blacks.You have not presented any evidence to counter what is written above.

    The idea that the Vikings were white based on Arab sources is based on speculation. The people ibn Fadian talked about were the ar-Rus. This means that he was talking about the Russian people. Some researchers claim that ibn Fadian mentioned Vikings because they have interpreted the term al-baringär as an Arabic rendering of the Old Norse name vceringar a name for the Vikings, but this is speculation since it does not take into account the lack of relationship between /vce/ in vceringer and baringer. Moreover, there were ‘whites’ living among the Vikings so there is no way we can say that some Vikings were white, and over time through marriage with whites the color of the population may have changed.

    1. The original Vikings were white and have always been white. They were Northern Europeans! Your comment is based on your delusional notion to make white culture yours. Stop spreading lies! There are NO reliable sources claiming the Vikings were black. Every scholar agrees that the Vikings were white with white skin. They were White.

      1. We’ve all been lied to there needs to be a reexamination of all the facts. I white and these revelations don’t ruffle my feathers one bit. With DNA the truth is bound to come out for better or for worse we should seek the truth.

        1. Well said Nord Girl. DNA is impartial. I would think that knowing real human history would supersede ego. The premise of any intelligent human being is that they are human first. When you think human you approach others the same way.
          If you think race first that’s is how you approach others and, consequently, isolate yourself from the human family. Only our creator is superior.

  4. thats-,what-,the,albions-have-done,-steal-culture,of,the-moors-and-brand-them-negro
    while,-stilll-weariin-the-fez-fromthe-first-cultue-who=invented,race-thenegro–these-are-those-who-colored-all-pale/bleac-in,hizzzstory–lies–since-u-falsely-called-urself-white–an,killed/spilled/blood/.there-are-no-black-supremacy-ideas-but-corrections-to,albion-fictitious,print-an-art,mankind-is-not-grafted-t-from,akebulan-now-called-africa,africa,startded,in-east-in204ad,after,cyprio-africaanus-conquered-carthage-u-are-bullsht-cause-u-havent-really-studied-what-u-are-saying-is-bullsht,,,a,curse,doesnt,-legitimizze-ur-verrse-,since,u,innvented-color-an–called–us-black-fromur–bleac-we-called-albions–it-is-u-that-cared-about-color-to-create-lies-after-land-was-stolen-in-the-west,theliar-cannot-noww-claim-he-is-being-lied-to-,theory-is-dead-we-all-know-who-we-are-an-how-we-raised-europe-to-speak-with-latin-from-north-akebulan–rome-was-first-called-mohr,,their,wee,none,blue,eyes,aryan10,000,yers,ago,only7000,by,aryan,mans,own,admission

  5. Would Zulus or Bantus accept an in-depth analysis of their ancestory by white supremacists, a white immigrant university in South Africa. Very unlikely, because a racist political agenda would be very likely, and could not be ignored.
    Dr. Winters article, above, makes much use of late nineteenth century ENGLISH scholars,all, without exception, products of racist grammar schools. English academia was at the very height of codified racism at this time, much of their work was used to support their fellow German Nazi racists in the next generation.
    The purpose of Nazi racism was to create a vast empire with only those of the German race being in control, to do this it was necessary to use racist propaganda . The purpose of English racism was almost identical, to maintain an empire with only those of the German race (the English) being in control. It was necessary to discredit the culture of the Celtic peoples through propaganda in order to keep them subservient to the ruling class of the immigrant Germano-English.
    At that time, Africa was being exploited, the African people were not understood or respected, and were presented as immature dependent races, as children, it was really helpful for English supremacists to present the sovereign peoples of the British islands they had invaded, (The Britons, the Cornish, the Manx, the Welsh, the Scottish, and the Irish) as all being racially inferior to the English, as children of Queen Victoria, needing to be led by the hand, (into that great inter-German tribal war called World War 1), and into the further delights of civilized enlightenment.
    I believe that the purpose of these Victorian publications was to show that the English were the only fully white race in the “British isles” and therefore the only race entitled to rule. They are political and racist rather than scholarly, Dr. Winter should find better sources.

  6. The suggestion that the Ivory Lady of York was a black British ‘Celt’ is misleading. When her skeletal remains were tested her ancestry assessment suggested a mixture of ‘black’ and ‘white’ ancestral traits, and the isotope signature indicated that she may have come from somewhere slightly warmer than the UK. Taken together with the evidence of an unusual burial rite and grave goods, the evidence all points to a high status incomer to Roman York, not somebody that was born there. It seems likely that she was of North African descent, and may have migrated to York from somewhere warmer, possibly somewhere around the Mediterranean.

    1. @the shitstorian,

      The one drop rule no longer applies? Many black people in the west have 30% white DNA are they still classified as subsaharan African. It seems like people are only classified as mixed if they are from North Africa or are they now Caucasians to enforce the pink Jew lie of originating in North Africa (Israel).

      And you are guessing at this woman’s origin. It seems like is an opinion. What proof do you have to suggest the woman wasn’t originally from York, is it her dark skin? If you are not.offering concrete evidence don’t bother commenting. We know that whites telling history is them using their imagination. You said maybe she’s from north Africa, maybe she’s from the Meditterane, which is it? By the way, saying you are historian online doesn’t make it believable. You can be all that you want to be online.

      1. The Historian has given a better evidence and comment than you, that is for sure. You also don’t know this woman’s orgin so don’t bother commenting as well. Also….how the hell does she proof that the Vikings were black?! Get a grip people.

        1. No, it did not give any evidence. You agree with it and thats why you are claiming it gave better evidence than I. How can uneducated guesses be construed as evidence? The whole premise of white science/medicine us based on “maybe”, “probably” and “likely.” Ever watch a science with so called white experts and the consistently repeat maybe, probably and likely. Stop trolling under different names. Your writing style is a dead give away.

          1. They are not uneducated guesses, but educated theories! The whole premise of White science has saved billions of people from death. “Maybe”and “probably” sound better than nothing. You get where I am going with this? At least they are doing something worthwhile and a lot of their accomplishments/creations/books are evidence.

    2. So, why is the one drop rule used when you be don’t want to associated with blacks but its ok for you to claim the folks are not black if they are of mixed heritage. We did not create the one drop rule and would appreciate it if you all would just admit that.

    3. So what happened to that one drop rule America valued so dearly that stated, “If you have one drop of negro blood you are NON-WHITE”? At the very least you’re describing a mulatto woman. Black by all circumstance and definition. Your ancestors made that rule, live with it. North Africa is black Africa the same as the sub Saharan area. Arabs, Greeks, Romans, Italians, Spaniards, etc, are/were Mulatto/multiethnic/multiracial nationalities. Nothing white about any of them. I would assume the same of most of Europe until the Neanderthal/Scandinavians come into play, but I wasn’t there and history has proven to favor the liar from what I can see. Honestly the only white people I can tell of in history at all would be purely Neanderthal/Scandinavians, that’s it, nothing else. Now was Scandinavia the original home of these Neanderthals? That’s a better question. I would lean towards no.. Scandinavia is where they ended up..

  7. @poison, death, mass murder comes to mind not life saving but it all depends on your definition of life. I personally wouldn’t want to rely on toxins or machines to sustain me. And i guess by life saving you are referring to the multi billion dollar poison industry. A theory was a guess the last time i did high school chemistry but hey the meaning could.have changed to theory. Maybe and probably is better than nothing? Sound like bs gues. Why not present concrete facts? what evidence are inbooks written about theories? Aside from trolling rastalive wire what are your accomplishments?

    1. Apparently, you have never opened up a math, science, history, etc book. They are proofs, created by hard work. You Afrocentric people are everywhere and most people laugh at you. Whatever, your insecurities in your own race cause you to backlash and ignore achievements from other races. Genocides in Africa are going on as I am typing this….violence from Black people.

      1. Actually, it is you the Eurocentric who is insecure. Here you are trolling a website where you clearly disagree with the information presented. Why are Eurocentics so insecure? I do not go where I do not belong. Stormfront, niggermania and chimpout and the millions of white racist sites and groups say things that i do not agree with but t i don’t go to those sites nor do i interact with the people in those groups. And i certainly do not try to tell them how to think. You are a typical eurocentric trash who is riding on the back of the perceived greatness of your race when in fact you have not done anything useful in your life. I can tell them you don’t have more than a grade school education and/ir possibely you.suffer from some kind of mental defect or you are a child. You are not.presenting anything that none us has never seen. If you dont like the truth dont come here. Keep living your eurocentric delusion of grandiose. What did Africa have to do with what we were discussion? All civil strife in Africa has a european behind it. You see europeans stole all the land and resources and then set the different tribes against each.other if they dont murder thems themselves. I never understood what people nean when they say africans are in africa killing each other. Who is is in eurpoe killing europeans? Who is india killing indians and the same goes for china and the rest of the world. Its quite normal for people to kill each other on micro levels. Inta-racial murder is more common than interracial murders. There is a question of genocide when europeans start to murder for resources. Now, why shouldnt africans kill each other on a micro level like any other race. Thete cones a oroblem when you ate invaded by race of psychopathic murderers who wants total control. Europeans are nothing but bloodthirsty.parasites who rob and kill to advance their so called civilization.

        Do yoy see where.i.am going? Why are eurocentrics obsessed with black people? I don’t

      2. it seems that u do not no anything about who saves life on this planet. everyone on earth was created by one MAN(JAH), so learn rather than thinking one is being racist. it is evident that Africa has abundant of natural minerals for the benefit of all man kind.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *