The Irish Slave Trade – The Forgotten “White” Slaves

Spread the love
726
Shares

The Slaves That Time Forgot

By John Martin

They came as slaves; vast human cargo transported on tall British ships bound for the Americas. They were shipped by the hundreds of thousands and included men, women, and even the youngest of children.

Whenever they rebelled or even disobeyed an order, they were punished in the harshest ways. Slave owners would hang their human property by their hands and set their hands or feet on fire as one form of punishment. They were burned alive and had their heads placed on pikes in the marketplace as a warning to other captives.

We don’t really need to go through all of the gory details, do we? After all, we know all too well the atrocities of the African slave trade. But, are we talking about African slavery?

King James II and Charles I led a continued effort to enslave the Irish. Britain’s famed Oliver Cromwell furthered this practice of dehumanizing one’s next door neighbor.

The Irish slave trade began when James II sold 30,000 Irish prisoners as slaves to the New World. His Proclamation of 1625 required Irish political prisoners be sent overseas and sold to English settlers in the West Indies. By the mid 1600s, the Irish were the main slaves sold to Antigua and Montserrat. At that time, 70% of the total population of Montserrat were Irish slaves.

Ireland quickly became the biggest source of human livestock for English merchants. The majority of the early slaves to the New World were actually white.

From 1641 to 1652, over 500,000 Irish were killed by the English and another 300,000 were sold as slaves. Ireland’s population fell from about 1,500,000 to 600,000 in one single decade. Families were ripped apart as the British did not allow Irish dads to take their wives and children with them across the Atlantic. This led to a helpless population of homeless women and children. Britain’s solution was to auction them off as well.

During the 1650s, over 100,000 Irish children between the ages of 10 and 14 were taken from their parents and sold as slaves in the West Indies, Virginia and New England. In this decade, 52,000 Irish (mostly women and children) were sold to Barbados and Virginia. Another 30,000 Irish men and women were also transported and sold to the highest bidder. In 1656, Cromwell ordered that 2000 Irish children be taken to Jamaica and sold as slaves to English settlers.

Many people today will avoid calling the Irish slaves what they truly were: Slaves. They’ll come up with terms like “Indentured Servants” to describe what occurred to the Irish. However, in most cases from the 17th and 18th centuries, Irish slaves were nothing more than human cattle.

As an example, the African slave trade was just beginning during this same period. It is well recorded that African slaves, not tainted with the stain of the hated Catholic theology and more expensive to purchase, were often treated far better than their Irish counterparts.

African slaves were very expensive during the late 1600s (50 Sterling). Irish slaves came cheap (no more than 5 Sterling). If a planter whipped or branded or beat an Irish slave to death, it was never a crime. A death was a monetary setback, but far cheaper than killing a more expensive African.

The English masters quickly began breeding the Irish women for both their own personal pleasure and for greater profit. Children of slaves were themselves slaves, which increased the size of the master’s free workforce. Even if an Irish woman somehow obtained her freedom, her kids would remain slaves of her master. Thus, Irish moms, even with this new found emancipation, would seldom abandon their kids and would remain in servitude.

In time, the English thought of a better way to use these women (in many cases, girls as young as 12) to increase their market share: The settlers began to breed Irish women and girls with African men to produce slaves with a distinct complexion. These new “mulatto” slaves brought a higher price than Irish livestock and, likewise, enabled the settlers to save money rather than purchase new African slaves.

This practice of interbreeding Irish females with African men went on for several decades and was so widespread that, in 1681, legislation was passed “forbidding the practice of mating Irish slave women to African slave men for the purpose of producing slaves for sale.” In short, it was stopped only because it interfered with the profits of a large slave transport company.

England continued to ship tens of thousands of Irish slaves for more than a century. Records state that, after the 1798 Irish Rebellion, thousands of Irish slaves were sold to both America and Australia.

There were horrible abuses of both African and Irish captives. One British ship even dumped 1,302 slaves into the Atlantic Ocean so that the crew would have plenty of food to eat.

There is little question that the Irish experienced the horrors of slavery as much (if not more in the 17th Century) as the Africans did. There is, also, very little question that those brown, tanned faces you witness in your travels to the West Indies are very likely a combination of African and Irish ancestry.

In 1839, Britain finally decided on it’s own to end it’s participation in Satan’s highway to hell and stopped transporting slaves. While their decision did not stop pirates from doing what they desired, the new law slowly concluded THIS chapter of nightmarish Irish misery.

But, if anyone, black or white, believes that slavery was only an African experience, then they’ve got it completely wrong.

Irish slavery is a subject worth remembering, not erasing from our memories. But, where are our public (and PRIVATE) schools???? Where are the history books? Why is it so seldom discussed?

Do the memories of hundreds of thousands of Irish victims merit more than a mention from an unknown writer? Or is their story to be one that their English pirates intended: To (unlike the African book) have the Irish story utterly and completely disappear as if it never happened.

None of the Irish victims ever made it back to their homeland to describe their ordeal. These are the lost slaves; the ones that time and biased history books conveniently forgot.

http://afgen.com/forgotten_slaves.html


Spread the love
726
Shares

541 thoughts on “The Irish Slave Trade – The Forgotten “White” Slaves”

  1. i do belive, as part irish blooded white man. That we as a nation of irish men, women, and child should take a stand, and make a day of remebrence for our fallin fellow irish people. they say that we should feel sorry for the african americans who were slaves, however they where never treated as horrable as the irish. so from this day forward i will make it noted that there will be a day of remebrence for the fallin irish. and to all those who agree with me please please help me set this to be far to all of the irish people you can send me an email at these_5_down_fan@yahoo.com please help a fellow irish men make it fair to all of us and make a day of remebrance thank u

  2. Growing up in America and being told to never admit we were Irish or we would be treated like the blacks. I hope more African American people read this and STOP BEING RACIST against white looking people because of our skin. We were brought up in my family NEVER to be racist and NEVER to hate anyone. However its obvious living in America I am hated by people of color for the color of my skin and eyes–my family NEVER EVER enslaved you–we were ALSO slaves. You can not tell an Irish person by last name only, lots of our names were turned into English names to avoid being treated WORSE than the Africans were treated. There is still a sign in a local restaurant that reads ‘Help wanted, Irish Need Not Apply”. The business owner thinks its a funny old time sign, worthy of decor. Not.

    1. 1. Irish people are white.
      2. Irish people have white skin privilege in this society.
      3. All whites are able to change their surnames to transcend their ethnicity.
      4. No white people ever admit to oppressing Africans.
      5. White expectations of love from victims of white supremacy will make sense when all white racist social structures and systems are destroyed

    2. we are not “white” we are Irish I understand you man leave the sign there It can be a conversation piece ad focal point for freedom of speech !

  3. passingby

    I truly never met an African or an African-American who really hated a Europeans or European descendants. It is not in our nature to hate. But we will not fail to condemn evil and impunity. The consequences of the British led European model of develoment was complete tragedy for mankind. For one step of achievement 10,000 would have to die needlessly. We will always denounce evil and evil doers. If these types fall more within the pale skin tribe of the world today, then shared history or not, we must speak up against perpetrators of wickness and their beneficiaries.

    Jahdey

    1. This Discussion of souls that want justice, is normal and Is healthy all of us make humanity and what we add to this discussion will be emotionally charged, though it is beginning to get us into politically complex situation let love shine on where the shared memory of suffering this should remind us not to make others suffer to understand we all have red blood so it is understandable that we can hurt each other with our words, Peace and understanding to all who hear this!

  4. Jahdey,

    . “It is not in our nature to hate.”—Jahdey
    My response: Bull!!! … and you’re hating in this very post!—“…shared history or not.”
    ——————-
    “But we will not fail to condemn evil and impunity”—Jahdey
    My Respone: Impunity?
    ——————-

  5. Eddy3957

    Yes, impunity was what I set out to denounce.

    But besides, you are the most boring whore I never met. Yawn!!

    Jahdey

  6. Jahdey,

    ‘Impunity’ requires elaboration as you used it…

    “Whore”? Glad you don’t have a hateful nature!

    Can’t wait for more hate! You’re a beauty!

  7. This has been an amazing discovery for me and a story that I have been shocked about. However, knowing the way the British have treated many nationalties over the past few centuries I guess I shouldn’t be so surprised. I’m really interested in researching this in more detail and would appreciate any advice or further links that anyone visiting Rasta Livewire may have.

    with best wishes

    JF

    1. The James being refered to is most likely,James the First, King of England and Scotland, the son of Mary,Queen of Scots, and Henry, Lord Darnley.James became king of England on the death of his cousin,Queen Elizabeth 1,daughter of Henry the Eigth and Anne Boleyn.
      Very little is taught on this subject in school.What ever I learned about it was from books in the library or in documentaries.It should be required reading,especially at junior high and high school levelThere is a lot of history that is not taught in schools, even events in European history. I do think that we all must work together to help each other, whether we are black, white,aisian or whatever.

Comments are closed.