Medieval Europe Before The Advent of The Black Moors of Africa

Spread the love
286
Shares

Before the Advent of the Black Moors of Africa who ruled parts of Spain for 700 years there was Medieval Europe a classic rat hole. Until the Blacks came in from Africa and cleaned it up.

In this installment, we present to our readers an article from Pravda describing all that had been achieved in European history just before the advent of the Black Moors of Africa. The Black Moors of Africa gave the Europeans, African sciences (now falsely termed as western science), African commerce, African architecture, African culture, African governance, African libraries and African hygiene.

Other installment will do a comparison of the state of development attained by the medieval age Black Moors of Africa who built Granada, Cordoba, Toledo, and other cities of Southern Europe.

Don Jaide

………………………………..

The stench of medieval Europe still echoes today
22.01.2008

People normally associate different epochs with different smells. The Middle Ages smell of sewage and decaying bodies. German writer Patrick Suskind, the author of a well-known novel “Perfume: The Story of a Murderer,” wrote in his book that the stench of European cities in the late Middle Ages period was unbearable. His work conveys the terrible smell of human faeces and urine in the streets, decaying wood and rat dung, spoiled coal and animal fat, mouldy dust and chamber pots.

Stench used to be an inseparable part of all human activities, constructive or destructive. The Queen of Spain Isabel of Castle (the end of the 15th century) confessed that she had taken a bath only twice in a lifetime – when born and married. A daughter of one of French kings died of lice. Dysentery and scab caused fatal terminations to Popes Clement V and Clement VII correspondingly. Duke Norfolk neglected bathing for religious reasons. As a result of such disregard numerous abscesses dotted his body.

A billet-doux sent by the inveterate Don Juan Henry of Navarre to his sweetheart Gabrielle d’ Estrées became an anecdote. Its contents conveyed the following meaning: “Do not wash yourself, my sweetheart, I’ll visit you in three weeks”. The king himself took a bath only thrice in a lifetime, twice coercively.

Russian ambassadors at Louis XIV court wrote that His Majesty stunk like a wild animal. Europeans considered Russians perverts because it was a tradition for the latter to take steam baths once a month.

European cities were buried in sewage. Town residents splashed the contents of garbage pails and washtubs out into the street on the heads of carefree passers-by. Stagnated slops made stinking pools; and a great number of town pigs crowned the whole picture. People emptied chamber pots right out of their windows making streets look like cesspools. Bathrooms were the rarest luxury. Fleas, lice and bugs swarmed in rich and poor houses of London and Paris.

Unsanitary conditions, diseases and starvation personify medieval Europe as it was. Even the noble class could not afford to eat their fill. Noble families were happy if at best two or three of ten children survived. Delivery was quite an undertaking for women: a third part of them died in labor. Street illumination also was poor – oil lamps, splinters or wax candles at best. Hunger, smallpox, leprosy and syphilis disfigured people’s faces.

There were not any cleaning agents or the notion of personal hygiene in Europe up to the middle of the 19th century. One Italian nobleman said in his memoirs that in the 16th century it was impossible to walk along the streets that resembled a fetid stream of turbid water. He had to hold a scented handkerchief or a small bouquet to his nose not to vomit. But not only faeces poisoned the air. Butchers slaughtered and disembowel cattle right in the streets. They would scatter guts around and pour blood out onto the pavement.

In late Middle Ages people learned to process wastes and faeces. Urine, for example, was used to tan leather and bleach cloth, animals’ bones – to produce flour. In days of old painters placed barrels for urine near the farms, they used it to knead paints. In Ancient Rome they sold even the urine from latrines to wool dyers and leather tanners. What could not be processed was left in the street.

Rain was the only street cleaner in those times. And still, notwithstanding its sanitary function, rain was considered a providential punishment. Rains washed dirt out of all cracks, and raging sewage streams rushed through the streets. Just like this there appeared a small river Merderon in France (from French “merde” – shit).

If there were stinking funds in the country, in cities people defecated in narrow side streets and yards. Only after the ‘hydraulic revolution’ aqueducts and gutters appeared; they provided houses with water and removed the sewage.

People were not cleaner than the streets where they lived. “Water baths warm the body, but weaken the organism and widen pores. That’s why they can be dangerous and cause different diseases, even death”, a medical treaty of the 16th century runs. Medieval doctors thought that infectious air could penetrate through the cleaned pores. Owing to this cause all social bathhouses were abolished. In 15-16th centuries rich citizens had a bath at least twice a year, in the 17-18th centuries they decidedly stopped to wash themselves. The French king Louis XIV had a bath only twice in his life on doctors’ advice. But the procedure shocked the sovereign so, that he made a vow not to do it anymore.

All hygienic arrangements included only hands and mouth rinsing, but not the whole face. “By no means you should wash your face, – wrote medics in the 16th century, – as it can cause catarrh or weaken the eyesight.” As for women, they had a bath only two or three times a year.

The majority of aristocrats used scented rags to rub the body. It was recommended to moisten armpits and groin with rose water. Men wore small bags with fragrant herbs between the shirt and waistcoat. Women used only fragrant powder.

Medieval ‘neat’ persons often changed their clothes. They considered that it absorbs all dirt and cleans the body. But our ancestors were rather selective on this issue. Clean starched shirt for every day was a privilege for rich people only. That is why white crimped collars and cuffs that were the evidence of wealth and cleanliness of their owners became fashionable. Poor men neither washed nor changed their clothing. Most of them had only one shirt. No wonder – clothes were extremely expensive. The cheapest canvas shirt and one milk cow, for example, had the same price.

Source: Pravda.Ru URL:

http://english.pravda.ru/science/earth/103574-stench-0

Translated by Ksenia Sedyakina
Pravda.ru


Spread the love
286
Shares

60 thoughts on “Medieval Europe Before The Advent of The Black Moors of Africa”

  1. No…it means “sub-Saharan” (i.e. found below the Saharan desert) Africans. And please tell the “pink Europeans” that they should not be tanning.

    Oh, and there have been NO TRACES of ‘black Africans’ in Europe. And those “barbarian” tribes have nearly always existed in Europe since Romans recorded their existance.

    And that “Moorish Saint” is none other than Saint Maurice, who is ‘presumed’ to be a black African.

  2. Skeptic

    Since you now realize that Moors are Black Africans, argument is done.

    It is for you to go read about the impact of Moorish Africa on medieval Europe. I already gave you some links but millions of additional references and links exist a goggle search away.

    The Moorish patron saint of Corsica is not Saint Maurice. This Moorish Saint of Corsica comes from the days when Black Africans were Kings and teachers over Europe between 7th century AD and 15 century AD. We lost Cordoba in 1495. The world turned upside down ever since.

    Saint Maurice was a Roman era Black Moor who made a great impact on Germania. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saint_Maurice

    The Moors of Spain, France, England and Sicily date to the medieval times. They were African muslims. But they were not Arabs. Take a look at the head of the Moorish patron saint of Corsica and Spain. It was originally made by the Spaniards but the Corsicans also adopted it in 1946:

    http://images.google.ca/images?hl=en&q=moor+flag+corsican&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wi

  3. Oh, that “Patron Saint” of Corsica is Julia, a CARTHAGINIAN NOBLE.

    “Some scholars believe she may have lived a century or two later and was murdered by Moorish raiders.”

    “The Moor’s head with a white bandeau was adopted by Pasquale Paoli in 1762 as the official emblem of independent Corsica. It was inherited from the kings of Aragon, who were invested with Corsica by the Pope in the Middle Ages.”

  4. Just admit it Jahdey:

    The “Moors” were largely arab Muslims – not ‘black Muslims’. Claiming their accomplishments in Europe is as farcical as a Serbian claiming that the Ottomon Empire was ‘white’ because they enslaved white people/had white servants/had white footsoldiers.

    Also, you are ‘whitewashing’ (excuse the pun) the brutal oppression the Moors enjoyed over the native Catholic Spaniards – claiming that it was the “high point of Europe” is as silly as claiming that European colonisation of Africa was the “high point of Africa” because of all the innovations we brought there.

  5. Sceptic

    You suffer from the racist affliction which produces a proclivity in some to tend to reduce all evidence of Africa’s historical achievement to some slavery story. I understand your problem which is why I decided to help you out of the pit of ignorance.

    Shakespare’s Othello was a Moor. He was black. Rembrandt one of the greatest artist of Europe depicted the Moors as your so-called sub-saharan African. Spanish national flags, Corsican national flags as I pointed out, depict the Moors as subsaharan Africans.

    Beside your work of dubious authority written in the 20th century by a revisionist historian you have not cited any other relevant authority as refutation of my claims. You instead make a show of emptiness. Kindly cite a credible and cogent authority to refute one of those sources I just gave you.

    Moors were and are not Arabs. Arabs are Arabs and they come in Black and white shades. Whereas the Moors are an ethnicity in Black Africa. See the Corsican flag again. Which is why their civilization in Europe was known as Moorish civilization as opposed to Arabic civilization.

    The Moors used Arabic as lingua franca but Arabic is a branch of the AFRO-ASIATIC language phyllum. Spaniards, French and Italians are not Romans even though they speak dialets of Latin. Same applies to the Moors.

    The image on the flag is not St Julia. St. Julia is from the 5th century AD. This flag dates from 15 century AD. Shakespare’s Othello dates from the same time. Queen Elizabeth’s the first blackamoors date from then.

    Sceptic, it is better you go do some research on Moors. Don’t force me to make you look foolish. By your flip flops, it is clear to me that you have not yet gone through tertiary institutions of learning. It is better you are backed with information before you decide to take on those who know more than you do.

    It is up to you to believe or dis-believe the evidence of your own eyes. No racist programming, fantasy or wishes can change facts.

    You accuse the Spaniards of lieing about the colour and ethnicity of the Moorish heads on their flags eventhough they lived with Moors for 700 years. You are not as qualified as Shakespare or Rembandt or the Corsicans and the Sicilians, nor the writers of encyclopedia britannica who have all testified that Moors are Blacks from Africa.

    You are not aware of the Beri beris of Nigeria, nor of the Touaregs of Niger, Chad and Mauritania, so I do have some sympathy for you. Those are Moorish tribes.

    Have you heard of the Lamtunas, the Fulanis, the Bozos, Almohades and Almoravids, Senegalese Moors?

    It is obvious that you still have much to learn. Go read, learn something, then come back with your sources and engage me.

    Jahdey

  6. THERE ARE DIFFERENT SHADES OF BLACK ( SKIN TONE ), SO I DON’T KNOW HOW BLACK YOU SHOULD BE TO BE CONSIDERED BLACK. EVEN IN THE SAME HOUSEHOLD YOU MAY HAVE SOME WHO ARE LIGHTER THAN OTHERS IN COMPLEXION, DOES IT MEAN THEY ARE NO LONGER BLACK BECAUSE THEY ARE LIGHTER THAN THEIR SIBLINGS!? SURELY THE MOORS ARE LIGHT SIN AFRICANS ( SOME OF THEM ARE DARKER THAN MOST OF US AFRICANS ), THAT DOESN’T MEAN THEY ARE NOT BLACK. THE LIGHT SKIN FULANIS OF NIGERIA DON’T SEE THEMSELVES AS WHITE PEOPLE, NEITHER DO THE GREEKS (BEING DARKER THAN NORTHERN EUROPEANS)SEE THEMSELVES AS BLACK PEOPLE! SO THE MOORS ARE AUTHENTICALLY BLACK. PERIOD!

  7. MOOR MMADIKE, the Berbers (of which the Moors were largely comprised of) are, in anthropological terms, “largely caucasoid”.

Comments are closed.