Blue Blood is Black Blood – By – Egmond Codfried
During the Middle Ages Black peoples in Europe were called Blue men. There seem to be images of this period which show Bleu people. I know of a Renaissance crucifixion scene with a light blue Jesus. In the Renaissance we start seeing many, many images of blacks, called The Moor.
Mike Nassau writes about Nubians and Iranians which were brought to Europe in 50 BC by Caesar to fight the Germanic nations. They stayed on and had their own communities along the Rhine and the Danube. Nassau states that in the 17th century Europeans arrived in America who were called Black Dutch. They were not treated like the Africans who were held in slavery. Many Whites were also kept as slaves or slave like conditions. Later on Black and coloured families claimed descend from these Black Dutch to prevent re-enslavement or being treated as niggers. The point is that somehow Black and coloured people were present in Europe and managed to keep their Black looks through intermarriage till at least the 17 century.
I suggest we look at the Moor in European Art and take it from there. In European Art the Moor is always a Classical African: pitch black, frizzled hair, a flat and wide face, flat nosed, thick lips, and subnasal prognasty.
When you study the symbol of the Moor from The Renaissance (1500) you will find that it did not start out like a Black Servant or a Black Page. The Drake Jewel (1575) shows the profile of a Black King dominating the profile of a White woman. This symbolises Africa dominating Europe and Black superiority in Europe.
The symbol of the Moor shows a Blue man which is a Black man and means Blue Blood. We see many portraits of the nobility in which they pose very intimate with a little Black boy or girl which gives the sitter riches, mostly pearls which seem to symbolise Europe.The nobility was coloured, and some showed more African or Asian or White treats. These portraits are kept hidden or are destroyed around the French Revolution (1789).
Inside The Drake Jewel is a miniature of Queen Elizabeth I. Her father’s sister Mary Tudor was the grandmother of Mary of Scots. Mary of Scots son was James I who married Anne of Denmark. They were the grandparents of Charles II Stuart who was named “The Black Boy.”
He was described on a wanted poster issued by parliament as a tall Black man and I do not think they were fooling around.
Anne of Denmark had ordered a play “The Masque of Blackness” (1605) in praise of Black beauty which did not fade. The play was performed by members of the court and it explained how Blacks, The Sun People, came to Europe to look for a milder sun. In the play was a personage of The Niger River. The costume design shows a tall Black woman. Strange as this might sound; it took me after all three years to believe my own findings: Anne of Denmark which we know as a blindingly blond woman was almost certainly Black. As the whole Stuart dynasty was Black of skin.
When one looks for portraits of Charles II Stuart “The Black Boy” one finds many which show a White man, with long black hair and mustachio. But if one persists there are portraits which show black skin. Especially the National Portrait Gallery site shows many portraits of a Black skinned boy and later a Black adult. Still there is a lot of variations, but I have one pitch black portrait which show his classical African treats under a huge afro-like wig.
So there were Black Kings in Europe, who somehow traced their origins in Africa and symbolised their Blue blood with the image of a Moor. The portraits which show Blacks as White’s I would explain as propaganda to make them look as the White people they so despotically oppressed. Other white portraits are over painted authentic Black portraits, or whitened copies of these or outright fakes. All European museums show portraits of the European elite, with fake white skin colour. We know that all the European royal families were blood relatives.
The Black Boy’s mother, for instance, Henrietta Maria, was the daughter of Maria de Medici, Queen of France and the aunt of Louis XIV, The Sun King. The sister of The Black boy was Maria Henrietta Stuart who married the Dutch Stadholder William II. Their son was King Stadholder William III, who ruled Britain as William and Mary.
(All this can be verified in google)
Thank you, My posts are blocked at rastalivewire by a hater.
I have first provided you with my own sayings, and my books are the only books in the world that claim and show brown and black european nobles and kings. I make use of sources that talk about ‘the cult of Rembrandt’ but do not mention this cult included the whitening of portraits. Or books about the rise of the magi, the black king Balthazar, but which fail to connect him with the rise of the Black, Christian nobility and King. In fact any book or historical movie can be a source if one substitutes the persons and actors with Black persons. JARogers Sex and Race introduced the idea of modern Black royalty. He leads where Ancient and Modern Britons by David McRitchie left off. Paul Kaplan The rise of the magi traces the Black King at the birth of Jesus in imagery, but fails to link this to actual history with Blacks dominating.
Slavery is not pay back, as we today did not oppress any serfs or used their skins for shoe leather. Racism was invented by bourgeois ‘scientists’ who also invented human races to elevate white serfs into humanhood. In order to forge an alliance to free Europe from noble rule. The bourgeois stole the French Revolution and whites were finally emancipated in 1848. They had all the paintings altered, this you can deduce from Alison McQueens book about the Cult of Rembrandt. In spite of all her sources she failed to write about the retouching of Rembrandts paintings.
I’m quite clear that the whites who were kept as shoeleather cattle by the nobility had the right to free themselves, but I refuse to accept any notion of pay back. I rather ask if whites should not move on, as Blacks have moved on. So to me racism is a rational ideology, not to promote your former oppressor back into power, but this threat has lapsed, their are no black nobles and kings to oppress whites anymore. The problem is, if you accept that Europe was a Black Civilisation, where the artefacts are. Well they are in museums staring at us, but altered to resemble white people. We need to challenge these fake images and the people who are in the know.
All would be clear if you reach for your copy of a Jane Austen novel to confirm she wrote solely about brown and black complexioned gentry and nobles. Emma would be the best or next Mansfield Park.
Kindly keep sending me more questions, as you see I will try to answer all.
egmond codfried
bluebloodisblackblood@hotmail.com
I seem to be able to post again.
“” Sadi says All congratulations Bro Egmond for this interesting research.I see know why all this paintings that the Mindele accepted to show looked somehow weird! Reason is as they have been whitened the features didn’t match anymore with the color of the face.”
What does the name ? Mindele mean?
The European noble and bourgeois elite was brown and black of complexion, but some also had classical African facial traits, what some would call Black today. The nobility self-identified as Black with little heraldic Moors. Europe 1100-1848 was a Black, Black Identified civilization. Supremely documented, Yet they have changed the colour not the contours of the faces, so one can still see on some the frizzled hair and the lips and noses that are classical African. I have based my research on personal description that say a certain person was brown or black of complexion. When everybody has seen that the old masters are overpaints , then we will understand that Europe was dominated by Blacks, which is the reason why we have racism. Racism was invented by the brown and black complexioned bourgeoisie to get rid of the noble rule: racism is a liberation ideology. The whites and the bourgeoisie wanted to be free.
How will you join my campaing to free us from racism in this very year?
Egmond Codfried
Dear brother Mindele is the lingala (central africa language)word meaning alien, or “uncomplete person” for those who come out of Black man and think they can dominate him. My contribution to our awakening is to read and spread what i gather from researchs like yours.Yaa Bless!
To the makers of Hidden Colors
The Hague, 22 January 2013.
Mr. Tariq Nasheed,
After carefully watching your DVD of Hidden Colors (2011) my conclusion is that you must be in league with the enemies of Blacks by presenting the unaware public with wrong and unfinished research, and by promoting further division among Blacks by linking Black History to anti- activism, anti-women liberation and anti-gay emancipation efforts. The divide between men and women is the greatest scorch, while all well thinking people understand that women need to be equal to men, that we need to get rid of the patriarchies of old, for Blacks to exist and prosper. By your vulgar gay bashing you have alienated Blacks from at least 20% of their own: parents, children, siblings, and taxpaying, fellow workers.
And showing how the penal system is working against any Black as you did, is really meant to intimidate any Black in trying to overturn the status quo. The Fat Cats and bitter, mean spirited women, and the obviously closeted hateful gay professors, you have presented: utter old fashioned white solutions to the Black Problem and are basically telling Blacks: Do not bother, there is no use, be like us, join the capitalist system, rape women legally (prostitution) and bash your gays (only the men as women sexuality does not count) and all will be well in the world. The problems are shown as so great and so overwhelming, that the whites come off as these immensely powerful creatures who are always ahead, who have always conquered and vanquished Blacks from time immemorial, Blacks should not even THINK of trying to change anything.
The truth and the lies are presented as a mix, so the debunking of your story is made hard, because there is truth is some parts although presented in a terribly wrong context. And you show the dreaded fakes, whitened images that were created to keep us in the dark. You fail to identify whites as albino derived, because this is what whites especially hate to hear, as it shows they did not come first and that they came out of Blacks, and thus could never, ever be superior to Blacks.
I have recognized a few images which I have generally introduced on the web, and they are presented by you without the context of my Blue Blood Is Black Blood (1100-1848 ) Theory, scientific research, which basically says that Europe during this time should be regarded as a Black Civilisation, with brown and black complexioned native Europeans dominating, ruling, civilizing and christianising whites who are Asian, and a foolproof albino derived nation, but late comers. Part of the brown and black complexioned Europeans declared themselves in 1100-1200 a blue blood nobility and self-identified with heraldic Moors as Blacks. They created the Black King Balthasar, the Black Madonna’s and the numerous Black Saints as propaganda for Black Superiority. Together with the bourgeoisie they were the second estate, and both of these Black European ‘tribes’ oppressed the whites who were reduced to lowly serfs, and outcasts of the cast society. The elite even used their skins for shoe leather. The French Revolution brought the nobility down, but they re-emerged with restorations like the one by Napoleon. Your type of research after all these decades remains patchy, spotty and anecdotic when it comes to the presence of Blacks in Europe, for not naming names or showing Black portraits. Just like the enemies of Blacks like to keep it.
The end was in 1848 with the final Revolutions when the third estate, the white serfs, were emancipated and got general suffrage for men. Next, in reverse they set out to ‘restore’ the portraits of the ancient regime to what they claimed was the true intention of the painters, and retouched the hell out of the supposedly ‘darkened’ paint back to white. An old photo of The Syndics by Rembrandt introduced by me on the web shows he made his figures all shades of brown and showed classical African facial traits along with colour. My museum has embarked on a international campaign to make the public aware of the fact that all Old Master portraits in museums are fake, whitened over paint, while the brown faces and brown hands underneath remain highly visible.
In spite of this you showed a whitened, fake image of James I Stuart, the grandfather of Charles II Stuart who you did present as a Black person, somehow suggesting that the Nobility and Kingship was instigated by whites who intermarried with some Blacks, resulting in a few Black or ethnically mixed Kings. This is totally wrong, and this points to your intentionally unfinished and highly misleading research. The image of the Spanish Queen Isabelle shows her with long blond hair, which is totally ridiculous, with the Habsburgs famous for massive prognathism. The rule by Blacks is the cause of racism against Blacks today, as the bourgeois philosophers had invented Racism against the Black-identified nobility as a liberation ideology. Blacks are thus one step above apes, which were presented to the white masses as people who had degenerated because of their immoralness.
There are many genealogies available which show intermarriage between and among nobles and royals, so with finding one or two Black person with those ranks, and comparing images with personal descriptions that say brown or black of complexioned, one can understand the whole elite to have been brown or black and self-identifying as Black. Images of Moors are symbolic and seldom represent real persons. A painter did not need to have a person in front of him to create an image of a Moor. There is no proof of Moorish persons directly from Africa teaching or having any powerful positions at universities or courts. The European Blacks are native, they regarded themselves as from the soil, and claimed senior rights over whites. The Islamic Moors that ruled Spain do not show up beyond the South of France, and there is no sign of any Islam among the ruling, brown and black complexioned European Christian elite, after they were driven from Spain. This misinformation all leads to a dead end, and serves the enemy of Blacks well.
Because your message is no threat to white supremacy teachings of history which omits Blacks as an elite, and because you present so-called scholars who manage to find Black Emperors sitting on China’s thrones, and Black Kings in Mesoamerica, but cannot find extremely well documented and depicted European Emperors like Leopold I Habsburg, or Charles V Habsburg that represent a Black Civilisation: it seems to me they are working AGAINST Blacks Liberation. That’s also why your false prophets of hatred can be so successful, they are part of the oppressing system. They represent how the enemy of Blacks who never sleeps has co-opted Black History and has tried to turn it in an instrument of hatred, derision, division and oppression. Like how slavery was perpetrated with the help of some Blacks to enslave and keep Blacks in slavery. You are not part of the solution, but part of the problem. You are all Fat Cat sell-outs, well ensconced, with a well-feathered nest, but out and out TRAITORS to the Blacks. You bold facedly introduce more and new division between Blacks. Really not better then the Africans who from 1441 sold Africans to the Black Europeans who kept their brethren in slavery.
The only merit from your DVD is that Blacks can come face to face with their direct enemies.
Egmond Codfried
Curator Suriname Blue Blood Is Black Blood Museum
Bluebloodisblackblood.blogspot.com
bluebloodisblackblood@hotmail.com
“Sadi says : Dear brother Mindele is the lingala (central africa language)word meaning alien, or “uncomplete person” for those who come out of Black man and think they can dominate him. My contribution to our awakening is to read and spread what i gather from researchs like yours.Yaa Bless!”
I would say, it’s the whites who still carry a grudge, who still have a victim mentality by keeping a fight, a fear going on that should have passed already. they should just move on. In France I was taken aback in Marseille where they showed you bulletholes on a church were people were executed by the German invaders. I was thinking about the people who were murdered by the French themselves in Algeria.So we now have a handle on Racism, a liberation ideology, and the retouched portraits they maintain and show should be scrubbed clean. no more lies, no more secrecy, no more keeping us out of the kitchen, the cat is out of the bag. I have always maintained white supremacy is based on fake, whitened portraits, but only now I can see what I have postulated. That is why they seem to have all these writers and scientist, because they whitened the hell out of these Black portraits, proof that a brown and black skinned elite ruled and civilized whites. This is a new dawn, but we need to go out and point these fakes out. They bring our children to see them and the children should be forewarned that they will be shown fakes. And they should holler, and embarress the people who have been playing us for fools for so long now. Enough is enough.
my posts are blocked again
Nobody blocked your post. Rasta Livewire has never censured you before or now. Stop the paranoid comments.
Why do you speak so rude to me?
We teach others how to treat Blacks.
Kindly remove this comment of yours.
This stuff should be taught to black children. But after for so many years that they are useless subhumans. When you aware that you belong to the most hated group.on the earth and there isn’t a common thread holding your group together, you are left with a sense of hopeless. And it makes you wonder why would one so called race go to such lengths to discredit another so called race. Like my grandmother says, “Donkey, sey de world nuh level.”
After dem dun teef you history, teef you land, teef your humanity, teef you people as slaves, dem a now reteef de people and a sey dem dont belong to you. And not all of Africa belongs to you in first place. The only part that belongs to you are the areas below the desert. This is absolute loonisy. We stand back and watch itall happen because we have been physically and psychologically rendered powerless. Why are whites and the hybrids they have created in Africa telling the indigineous people of the land, “Go back where you came from.”
We are not powerless. I believe I irk Blacks by saying they are not victims, and there is a way out. Look for the International Campaingn against falsefied old master portraits and codfried in google. You cannot take on a whole bastion, but you can hammer away at the weakest point. This is the weakest link in their bastion of lies and hatred: the fake portraits. Take yourself to a museum, look closely at the faces and the hands, and you will see they are an over paint. If we challenge the veracity of the portraits, their pride and joy: Blacks will be free. There in all museums is the proof of the Black European elite I was talking about.
http://forums.philosophyforums.com/download.php?attachid=4545
Anna Karenina by Tolstoy is based on marya Pushkina, a Black woman.