Ancient Black Chinese From East Africa — (by Prof Jin Li)

Spread the love

Chinese come from Africa, just like the rest of us

Posted: Thursday, May 12, 2005

An international study has found that the Chinese people originated not from “Peking Man” in northern China, but from early humans in East Africa who moved through South Asia to China some 100,000 years ago, Hong Kong’s Ming Pao daily reported yesterday in a finding that confirms the “single origin” theory in anthropology.

According to the newspaper, a research team led by Jin Li (of Fudan University in Shanghai has found that modern humans evolved from a single origin, not multiple origins as some experts believe.

In China, school textbooks teach that the Chinese race evolved from “Peking Man,” based on a theory that humans in Europe and Asia evolved from local species.

But Jin and his fellow researchers found that early humans belonged to different species, of which only the East African species developed into modern humans.

This new finding nullifies the theory that the ancestors of the Chinese people were “Peking Man” who lived in northern China 400,000 years ago.

Based on DNA analyses of 100,000 samples gathered from around the world, a number of human families evolved in East Africa some 150,000 years ago, said Li Hui, a member of Jin’s team.

About 100,000 years ago, some of those humans began to leave Africa, with some people moving to China via South and Southeast Asia, Li said.

According to the newspaper article, it has been proven that the “65 branches of the Chinese race” share similar DNA mutations with the peoples of East and Southeast Asia.

It said that the Shanghai scientists were part of an international team comprised of researchers from Russia, India, Brazil and other nations in a five-year project studying the geographic and genealogical routes related to the spread and settlement of modern humans.

Spread the love

149 thoughts on “Ancient Black Chinese From East Africa — (by Prof Jin Li)”

  1. first, i have to say that almost 80-95% chinese belongs to O-M175 (that is specifically O3,O2 and O1), and almost every han chinese are the offshot of NO-M214.
    yes, some (1-5%) chinese (who are not from han or who are just simply mongolian) is C-M130 or D-YAP. but you should know that these so called “chinese” are not han ethnics.
    so far, i know that mt-R is less than mt-M is mordern east asian population, quite a myth. because originally mt-R correspond to MNOPS-M526 (or NOP*). O3-M122 correspond to mt-F1b,F2a

  2. let’s make it clear, real han chinese (direct descendant of ancient han) could only be about 25% percent acoording to the calculation based on autosomal result. today, most east asians including we japanese are just hybrids. this hybriding happens in the long past. but i’m quite sure that a few are still direct descendant who are not mixed. japan has 10%-15% C-M130 and D-YAP (D-YAP mostly come from jomon), 80% japanese belongs to O2+O3( yamato/yayoi) . japan and korea are also offshot of NO-M214. the main haplogroup of japanese and korean is O2b1.(O2-M95)

  3. that is, real han chinese are O3-M122+mt-R and not mixed with M130,YAP.

    there are several chinese are tested O3/O2/O1 but their mtdna is D4,D5,C,

    very few of them are mt-R. that’s why i say that most han chinese are hybrids.

    NO(father) +CD(mother) that’s why our autosomal result are wrong.

    1. Yes,so what?

      Chinese han still most linked with each other, with o3 genes(North to South)

      Since we are both east asian people,i won’t argue or debate with you.

      but,i know that, chinese han are unique,we are not relate to koreans or Japanese.

      Koreans and Japanse are both linked with Manchua or Mogol,yo are alatic race.

      We chinese han are all linked with Sino race,North are more pure,since our ancestor Huangdi is came from West of China (Gansu and Qinghai),South china is because we Han expand our empire to south in Qin, Then Han chinese mixed with Nanyue woman become south chinese today,but they are still our great han cousin and blood family,(There are only live in Guangdong.Guangxi.Yunan) Hunan Hubei are all belong to han under the NAME is Chu.

      No matter hybird or what, Han is always be Han,if your japanese welcome blacks is your thing, don’t count us in, i know it,even we are both locate in East Asia,but we chinese are always know that you koreans and Japanese are not belong into our blood type

      1. i do not want to debate with you, in fact i am sino-japanese, so i am also from han or lets say Hua sia. i can tell you that altaic language has nothing relates to korea and japan. korean and japanese used to speak sino-tibetan language. O3a3c-m134 Is the most common lineage in most Han chinese population . southern aboriginals like guangdong/guangxi zhuang ethnics true are more related to sub-saharan africans (YAP). the surname Ji ( surname of our ancestor Huangdi/ancient empiror of Zhou)is found to be of O3a3c1-M117 lineage. who also created modern Kanji.

      2. typical african ydna are DE-YAP, C-M130. National Geographic has shown the pictures. and undoubtfully C-M130 lineage is more related to east africans by far. DE,C,F is on the same stage. both emerged around 100,000 ybp (according to african eve hypothesis and the time of mtdna mt-L3(M/N)) . a further split took place between ancient european and ancient east asian around 40,000 ybp. That is, IJ*-M258 became the paleolithic cro-magnon man’s lineage and is only found in europe. later they are conquered by R-M207 from central asia(neolithic). K* (K1:LT and K2:MNOPS-M526) went east and gave rise to asians. thus they are ancestors to modern east asians(M214) and native americans (M45). MS*(K3,K4) went to sundaland and some occeana(melanesia, austrilia).

  4. in fact, ancient egyptians belongs to T-M70 (thus, a descendant from LT*), which represent a typical back migration from asia to north africa. the T-M70 is completely absent from other region exept in Egypt. They mixed up with local african aboriginals in some prehistoric times.

  5. therefore, those ancient blacks (DE-YAP/C-M130) have nothing related to Hua sia people(Han chinese).

  6. national geographic is camels eye treaty ,, by the terms u are usiing its known that these are not ancient china or japan nation states of united nations north asia minor did not in habit akebulan south asia monor but the other way around ,nothing ancient bout these names mongolia before china ,something else else before that europe fake blood testing science they created to keep light right an tie that with a penis god ,u fail to mention atlantis an the hindustan man from perot nooww called india ,,,do u to have a god lke aryan man who suddenly created u on that land , your origin are with the muurs asiatics from aatlantis if u dont want akebulan lemuria allso ,u tried to put us out of where u came from let me qquote a counterpart of yours,,,,,,,,who claims u are no moor then aryan hindu ,,,,,,,it is not i who insult you but ur foremuthers an fathers are older then u are climing by eliinting wht they told u was black skin cause i telll u like a told winnie its the dark matter inside u that bring u into the world,,if ur insides were as pale as euro skin they say is better then no moor babies cpould be born from that womb be carefull what u wish for cause the way u treat darker skin woman an men makes me wish that white curse wwould occur inside the bodies of those who falsely claim superioroty is lighter skin , you would cease to exist withut my black carbon u call melanin ,, you would go blind be cripple deaf a dumb without the black inside of all of ur bodies all wwould be bald blonde iss ressesivve resus ,,heres one aaryan view of u which is correct if u say no the akebulan or africa in west ,,yeah we came east before 1492,, there was a time when after atlantis aryan race developed aryavarsha- aryavarta an with it other sub races [aryan man claim] among which one was mongols chinese people an its originall name not in chinese langage was sin or land of sin go to i report on cnn an see ancient map of china in banakhuda posts in hindu epic mahabuaarat of 3138 bc stillll not ancient times u re mentioned as yellow race peole which u ae not an that u were off shoot of uindu aryan in very beginning ,,then ur bloodlon began but the cambodians were ancient maya who came back.ur claim leads u to this no matter how much blood word u a winnie provide causewe go back 100,000 years an muur to milions.ur claim of existance since u clam not to be from any anciients from east or west is no older then 70000 years if it has aryan in it an before aryan came an create aces iy was all all us who creted him am it says they create u an its true by what ur claimig cause if u dont come from us muus/moors dont come from ancient times as the color people claim falsely while excluding the dark the light comes from,,shang dynasty was not paleskin or yellow am u know u not color yellow like they not white red ruddy amazon turks u see show onn tv the young turks ask them they know they muurs an where they come from an u to ,an u didnt cross bering straight an become native america no

  7. liu bang 206 bc show me this han people before him before han dynasty to whher he was made king of han zhong ,,,his battles with xiang yu who mad him king ,,this aint so anciennt an one said u was from austrailia on u tube which/witch is lemuria broke offf from asia ,,where did they tell u u come from before the yellow river or yangtze river ,you are not from peking man but the aryan is caucus of the asian whiceber asiatic muur tht would be we started the imperial govt if u have one or had one communism is illuminati,jacob schifff ,illuminati set up red china red russia the reds as enemies like they try to make muslims today in a bad light an of course currse the darkskin people spell ,that how we really knoww u came last by your effort to say u were first like it matters cause u wasnt an that king wasnt first ,how many people died in those battles he had an the qi dynasty battles before ,fear of a black planet or the dark matter it was before we created the light

    1. what is your meaning?

      Why chinese han dose has anything to do with red russia?

      Sorry, i couldn’t understand your logic,here we talk about is our sino race blood type and history,is not mentioned anyting with modren china.

      Ayran or what is none of chinese business,why bother you? we don’t care ayan is good or superior,they are not our ancescor, they are good,is good for india not for us.

      Don’t tell me that aryan was in China bla bla same thing as blacks says the Ancient chinese han were black.

      Is so pity,why whites,blacks koreans all going to crazy to steal our civilization? is that not good enought for you guys?

      give us a break, to be honest,only japanese people they are really honest,they admit history not like others to distord the history.

Comments are closed.