Few points to note in the article below:
1. Fair skin does not have any efficiency advantage over darker skin when it comes to vitamin D processing.
2. White skin therefore has no vitamin D processing advantage over dark skin, be it in the northern or southern hemisphere.
3. Dark skin is more efficient than pale skin in processing vitamin D in the southern hemisphere.
4. Pale skin is hampered in vitamin D processing due to its tendency to burnt easily, and its inability to generate a strong enough immune response against skin cancer/melanoma.
5. The processing of vitamin D is linked to genetic disposition and is performed by organs that include the skin, the stomach, the bones and the liver.
Now read the rest of the article culled from the Telegraph:
Fair skinned people ‘need vitamin D supplements’
Vitamin D is essential for healthy bones and people get most of what they need from exposure to sunlight during the summer months.
NHS advice says that while there is not one recommendation to suit everybody, short daily periods (10 to 15 minutes) of sun exposure without sunscreen during the summer months (April to October) are enough for most.
But a new study funded by Cancer Research UK has found that people with very pale skin may not be able to spend long enough in the sun while also avoiding sunburn.
It suggests that the increased risk of skin cancer from excessive sun exposure outweighs any vitamin D benefit for people who are fair-skinned.
The study, from the University of Leeds and published in the journal Cancer Causes and Control, suggests the optimal amount of vitamin D required by the body is at least 60nmol/L.
Some studies have indicated that levels lower than this are linked to an increased risk of heart disease and poorer survival from breast cancer.
Meanwhile, levels below 25nmol/L are linked to poor bone health.
In the new study, people with fair skin did not, on average, reach 60nmol/L unless they were taking supplements, but they did reach above 25nmol/L.
Researchers also found that sunlight and supplements are not the only factors that can determine the level of vitamin D in the human body.
Genetic differences in how the body processes vitamin D have a strong effect on vitamin D levels.
The researchers also found that patients with melanoma skin cancer may need vitamin D supplements.
Professor Julia Newton-Bishop, lead author of the study, said: ”Fair-skinned individuals who burn easily are not able to make enough vitamin D from sunlight and so may need to take vitamin D supplements.
”This should be considered for fair-skinned people living in a mild climate like the UK and melanoma patients in
Experts analysed vitamin D levels for 1,203 people and found that around 732 had a sub-optimal level.
Those with fair skin had significantly lower levels than others in the group.
Sara Hiom, director of health information at Cancer Research UK, said: ”We must be careful about raising the definition of deficiency or sufficiency to higher levels until we have more results from trials showing that maintaining such levels has clear health benefits and no health risks”
”If you are worried about your vitamin D levels, our advice is to go see your doctor.”
This premise is incorrect. Fair skin does allow for faster production of vitamin D by allowing more UVB to penetrate with less melatonin to block it. However fair skinned people who avoid the sun because thet burn more easily produce less vitamin D because they are not in the sun through avoidance.
Skin pigmentation is designed for its natural range, when you move it away from its natural range problems ensue. A celtic red head is designed for northern UK life, while African skin is designed for equatorial life. Similarly polar bears and brown bears are adapted for their natural ranges. Humans are no different.
If you are going to cull an article together go to the science abstract not the media hatchet job of a science abstract.
If a Scottish red head is designed for northern UK life, then how come the rate of skin cancer in the northern hemisphere is one of the highest in the world?
Do you know what it suggests? It suggests that those red heads are not properly suited or adapted to the environment they claim they were designed for. You cannot live in your natural environment and yet the sun is killing you off there.
Go check the statistics on skin cancer in sunless Europe. Very high, amongst the socalled white people. Check the statistics for so-called dark skin people in Europe and elsewhere for skin cancer, and you will find it is almost non-existent… almost non-existent.
Go figure, Smart Alec…., figure that one out!
Because they fake tan on sun beds that give cancer…
“If a Scottish red head is designed for northern UK life, then how come the rate of skin cancer in the northern hemisphere is one of the highest in the world?
Do you know what it suggests? It suggests that those red heads are not properly suited or adapted to the environment they claim they were designed for. You cannot live in your natural environment and yet the sun is killing you off there.
Go check the statistics on skin cancer in sunless Europe. Very high, amongst the socalled white people. Check the statistics for so-called dark skin people in Europe and elsewhere for skin cancer, and you will find it is almost non-existent… almost non-existent.
Go figure, Smart Alec…., figure that one out!”
The answer to your load of tripe is quite simple. Dark skinned people do not face negative selective pressure in northern environments any longer because of modern agriculture and food mitigates the vitamin-d problem. Remove this and being fair skinned and having the ability to produce vitamin d more easily, despite being more prone to skin cancer, is more beneficial than not.
Of course a supremacist, black or white, will never accept simple logic.
LMAO! We were discussing so-called white peoples in their natural environments and why they face an evolutionary dis-advantage in their so-called homeland.
Your thin ass comes here and try to change the conversation from the subject to your own subject which is “why black people do not have evolutionary selective pressure”. Noone raised that issue.
We call that your move, the logical fallacy of “the red herring”, and “straw man’s argument.” You are busted.
Now let’s get back to topic. Tell us why red-hairs have a lot of problem living in Scotland, or Iceland. Thanks.
Dear Jahdey,
Since most of the scientists are European, they will never fully tell us the truth what the real reason is about genetic mutation. I’m with you, but those scientist will always choose the saver side from History. I’m pretty sure it’s because of the racist past through colonizing other countries.