The Yahweh Fraud (Part 1) – Yemisi Ogunsola

MANY Bible readers do not know that about five clearly different Hebrew words have been deliberately mistranslated into the English Bible as “God”. And that none of these five words means “Supreme Being”.

Rather, every one of these words refers to deities or gods.

These Hebrew words are El (also El Elyon), el, eloah, elohiym and Yahweh.

When about 200 years before the birth of Jesus, 70 (or 72) Jewish scholars gathered in Alexandria, Egypt, to make the very first translation of Hebrew religious texts into Greek, they found themselves in a dilemma.

Contrary to the “monotheism” preached by the Jewish faith (Judaism) in which their national deity, Yahweh, was touted as the “one and only God,” the translators found clear records in the texts of many superhuman beings called elohiym (gods) who took interest in, or took charge of the affairs of individuals or nations.

The records also showed that Yahweh was the personal name of just one of these elohiym each of whom was called an el or eloah. And that each of these elohiym had his or her personal name. The chief of these elohiym, according to the texts, was not even Yahweh, but another entity entirely, called El or El Elyon.

An accurate translation of these texts into Greek, the widely spoken language of those times, would deal a great blow to the Jewish faith. Not only would it expose the fallacy of the brand of monotheism preached by Judaism, it would also reduce Yahweh to the status of the gods and goddesses of other nations —- nations, which the Jews had always branded “idol worshippers.”

The Jewish scholars did not want these to happen. So they took a most patriotic —- but fraudulent —- decision: to doctor their translations to agree with the Jewish brand of monotheism, which claims that Yahweh, their local deity is the “one and only God” of the whole universe, while the deities of all other nations are demons or mere idols —- or totally non- existent.

They did accordingly.

They translated those five Hebrew words variously as it suited their purpose.

*Anywhere they saw the word elohiym (the plural form of el or eloah), meaning deities or gods, the Jewish scholars mistranslated it into Greek as Theou _ a singular word meaning “God” with capital letter “G”.

But they translated the same word correctly as gods when it refers to the elohiym of other nations.

Thus elohiym is mistranslated as God instead of gods in the very first sentence of Genesis; in Exodus 3:1; in Genesis 32:28 etc., but correctly as gods in Psalm 82:6; in Deuteronomy 32:17; Exodus 23:13, etc.

*The translators began referring to Yahweh as God such that “Yahweh told Moses” becomes “God told Moses” (e.g. Exodus 3:14) and actually translated Yahweh as God or the LORD (all capitals) or left it as Yahweh.

*They correctly translated el or eloah of other nations as god but translated same words incorrectly as God when it refers to the el or eloah of Israel.

Thus, while “el Philistine” is translated as “god of the Philistines”, “el Israel” is translated “God of Israel.”

As an example of how very misleading this can be, “el Philistine” in the Yoruba Bible is “Orisa awon Filistini” but el Israel” becomes “Olorun Israeli”, instead of “Orisa Israeli”.

*They translated El or El Elyon, the chief of all Canaanite gods also as God or God Most High (or Most High).

This way, the translators craftily erase this entity and prevent his identification as an authority separate from and by far superior to Yahweh their own local god.

For instance, the “Most High God” in Genesis 14:18 (whose priest was Melchizedeck), the “Most High” in Deuteronomy 32:8 and the “God” in Psalm 82:6 all refer to El Elyon, not Yahweh god of Israel.

The overall result of this deliberate mistranslations is a totally misleading impression/concept that Yahweh=Elohiym=God=God Most High.

The end product of this heavily flawed translation was The Septuagint (LXX), the first authorized compilation of Hebrew religious texts in Greek.

It is a document produced by the Jews about the Jews. Why must anybody take their word for it?

But evidently, the Christian Church did.

And this heavily racial and flawed document later got incorporated into the Christian Bible as the “Old Testament.”

And because it is in the Bible, the typical simple-minded Christian considers it “perfect”.

And so, today, millions of Christians sing praises of Yahweh (Jehovah) as God Almighty, not knowing they are worshipping a mere orisa “idol”—- the local deity of the ancient Israelites.

The concept of God, the Supreme Being, is so crucial and fundamental to our lives that any misconceptions about it can do incalculable harm to our worldview. This is, especially so, when the misconception is an impersonation of that most elevated being by a local deity of such a violent nature as Yahweh.

For instance, many Bible readers have been led to believe that the unprovoked attacks and invasion of other nations by the ancient Israelites and the blood-curling slaughter of women and children were ordered by God, the Supreme Being.

That is a lie.

It was Yahweh, the local deity of the Jews, one of the most blood-thirsty deities, who ordered those massacres. African gospellers especially, should carefully distinguish between the humanistic gospel of Jesus of Nazareth and the clannish inhumanity of the Israelite deity, Yahweh, which has brought on both the Jews and the rest of the world the very worst of human calamities.

It is difficult to believe that the highest hierarchy of the Church is unaware of this “God fraud.” After all, the translators of the new Living Translation of The Holy Bible, Tyndale House Publishers, admit in the introduction to that version that: “All appearances of ‘el, ‘elohim or ‘eloah have been translated as “God” except where the context demands the translation “god(s).”

And that context, as already pointed out, is whenever these words refer to nations other than the Israelites —- that is, all other nations of the world.

Fortunately, however, this “God fraud” was not perfectly executed. Many Old Testament passages and expressions give away the mistranslations.

For instance, the frequent occurrence of the expression “God of Israel” “God of Jacob” shows that the Hebrew words translated as “God” were never originally used as proper names like Yemi or Julius, but were generic terms like “Protector” or “guardian”. There can be many protectors or guardians.

Indeed, many of the elohiym acted as protectors of peoples or individuals with whom many of them signed pacts or “covenants.” It was common practice in ancient times for nations or races to sign pacts (covenants) with these gods.

Baal, one of the more charismatic gods with whom Yahweh competed bitterly for the affections of the Israelites, was called “Baal-of-the-covenant” by the people of Shechem with whom he apparently signed a pact.

Yahweh was simply one of these gods who took charge of the affairs of the Israelites —- after a covenant with their leaders on Mt. Sinai. There was nothing special about Yahweh “choosing” the Israelites.

To say, therefore, that the Israelites were the “chosen people” of a deity called Yahweh would be correct. But to call them the “chosen people of God” is fraud.

The God Fraud

yemiogunsola@gmail.com

10 thoughts on “The Yahweh Fraud (Part 1) – Yemisi Ogunsola”

  1. Thank you. I almost feel sorry for any greco-roman-judeo-christian peddlar who imagines that Black as I am, I would believe their tribal yarn. Come on Afrikans! Wake Up! Wake Up!
    GOD IS BLACK.

    1. Salaam,
      How can Allah be BLACK, when NEGROS are sooooo UGLY?

      MUSLIM GENOCIDE ON BLACK AFRICANS THROUGH MASS-CASTRATION
      Tidiane N´Diaye – Muslim Genocide on Black Africans Through Mass-Castration

      Explore the diversity of black-, white-, Jewish- and Arab ethno-centrism.

      Thanks to Universe Freedom for helping me out with the above translation.

      An Interview with Tidiane N´Diaye – Translated by Galliawatch

      In May 2001 the French Parliament passed a law that came to be called Taubira’s Law after its sponsor, Christiane Taubira, the socialist deputy from Guiana. I posted an English translation of the law in May 2006. The first part of the law qualifies both slavery and the transatlantic and Indian Ocean slave trades as crimes against humanity, but does not mention the Arab-Muslim slave trade. Madame Taubira is quoted as having said in 2006 that the Negro slave trade practiced by Arab-Muslims must not be brought up too often so that “young Arabs do not bear on their shoulders all the weight of the heritage of Arab misdeeds.”

      Now a book published in France by Gallimard, entitled Le Génocide Voilé (“Veiled Genocide”), exposes the cover-up of the Arab-Muslim slave trade, denounces the attempt to place all of the blame for slavery on the backs of Western countries, and goes so far as to qualify the atrocities committed by Arabs to Africans as “genocide.”

      The author is Tidiane N’Diaye, a Senegalese Muslim, anthropologist, economist, and researcher at INSEE (National Institute of Economic Studies). The following interview with the author is posted at Evene.

      Le Génocide Voilé is an inquiry into the Arab-Muslim slave trade. Why should we be interested in this subject today?

      Because the misery, the poverty, the long demographic stagnation and the current developmental delays of the black continent, are not merely the consequences of the transatlantic slave trade, as many imagine. The transatlantic drain is well known and has been debated for decades. Studies and syntheses on this slave trade are legion. And yet, even though one cannot speak of degrees of horror or a monopoly on cruelty, it is possible to declare that the Negro slave trade and the wars provoked by the Arab-Muslims were, for black Africa through the centuries, much more devastating than the transatlantic trade. Likewise the Islamization of many Negro-African peoples and all that it engendered, such as jihad, were no less the source of innumerable implosions. But to this day, only the genocide of black peoples by the Arab-Muslim nations has not been clearly acknowledged by those who research the responsible parties. Even though this crime is historically, juridically and morally forbidden.

      When did it begin and in what region(s)?

      In the 7th century A.D., the Arabs, having conquered Egypt, proceeded to enslave numerous peoples of Nubia, Somalia, Mozambique, and elsewhere, during the first Islamic expansion. The Nubians had been harshly dealt with in the fierce attacks by Arab forces. They defended themselves courageously, but faced with superior numbers and the determination of the soldiers of the jihad and the repeated assaults by Arab jihadists, the Nubians preferred to negotiate peace, concluding in 652 the treaty known as Bakht. This treaty committed the vanquished African monarch to turn over annually a supply of 360 captives to become slaves in the Arab-Muslim world. Thus it was that a large-scale Negro slave trade was for the first time invented by Arab-Muslims. I use the term Arab-Muslim because after the Bakht, this trade became trans-Saharan and Eastern, implicating more and more peoples and regions and extending far beyond the Arab world. The traders who took part were also Berbers from the Maghreb, Turks of the Ottoman Empire and Iranians, hence Persians. Many African captives were sold by the Arabs as far away as India, since the king of Bengal possessed about 8000 slaves in the 15th century. The majority of men deported at the start of this trade came from the population of Darfur. It all began there, and apparently it has never ceased.

      What were the specific forms and motivations of this slave trade compared with the transatlantic trade?

      In the Arab world – the Wahhabi system (Saudi Arabia) for example – did not favor economic and social development through the hard work of its inhabitants. It condemned them to an endless need for servile labor furnished by the Negro trade. Moreover, for an Arab of those times, a man is never poor so long as his neighbor possesses something. The Holy War came in handy, if you wanted to become rich. Since every believer had the obligation to lead a jihad, they said, it was imperative to subject and enslave the non-converted. They took the Koran abusively as a pretext to stage raids on their infidel neighbors, stripping them of all they possessed. And so it was that with a clear conscience and using methods that were convenient as well as blessed, most of these converted Arab tribes ended up not living from their own resources. Thus the permanence of the plague of the Negro slave trade and of Arab-Muslim slavery in Africa was due to the traditions of these peoples dating from a time when they could not, out of debauchery and laziness, do without servile men to infuse strength and new blood into them. For example, in the middle of the 19th century, one third of the population of Oman was African or of African origin. In Arab societies, Africans played a central role. They had no specific function but they took part in a great many common activities.

      You speak of massive castration…

      Before the terrible castrations there were first sudden raids and massacres. For example, in the Holy War led by that Sudanese Arab chieftain, a mystic, enlightened, who considered himself a Mahdi (descendant of the Prophet), the whole of Sudan from the ocean to Egypt, taking in all the plateaux of Africa – from the Nile to the Zambezi – was subject to manhunts and the sale of captives. This space was twice the size of Europe, and certain explorers estimated its population to be around 100 million in the the 19th century. To have an idea of the evil, you must realize that these same observers stated that to hunt down and carry off 500,000 individuals, it was necessary to kill almost two million others (who resisted or tried to flee). So if births had ceased at the time, then, in less than a half-century, the interior of Africa would be nothing but a desolate wasteland today.

      You also speak of genocide. Do you think there was a desire to annihilate the African Negro populations?

      I do indeed find the word “genocide” suitable for this unprecedented enterprise. It must be stated that the disdain of the Arabs towards Africans was also a catalyst. The famous Arab historian of the 14th century, Ibn-Khaldum, wrote: “The only people who accept slavery are the Negroes, because of an inferior degree of humanity, their place being closer to the level of animals.” The question then was: how to see to it that these “animals” did not reproduce in Arab-Muslim lands. For from the outset of the slave trade, the traders wanted to prevent them from becoming rooted. Since there was nothing metaphysical about it, castration appeared to be a practical solution. And so, in this effort to abase human beings, if the Arabs sent most black women to harems, they mutilated the men, using rudimentary procedures that caused a terrifying mortality. The figures on this slave trade are quite simply harrowing. (…)

      In the second part of the interview, of which I will quote one excerpt only, he discusses critically the work of Olivier Pétré-Grenouilleau, who also exposed the Arab-Muslim slave trade. He comments on the current situation in Darfur and reveals the truth about Zulu hero Chaka Zulu. His most interesting remarks deal with what he sees as the Stockholm syndrome African-style:

      Very numerous are those who would like to see the Arab-Muslim slave trade forever veiled in oblivion, often in the name of a certain religious, or even ideological solidarity. It is in fact a virtual pact signed and sealed between the descendants of the victims and those of the executioners, that leads to this denial. Because in this sort of “Stockholm syndrome African-style,” all of these fine people agree to place everything on the shoulders of the West. The selective silence surrounding the Arab-Muslim crimes against black peoples and this effort to minimize it, so as to better point the projectors solely at the transatlantic trade, is a cement being used to bring about a fusion of Arabs and Negro-African peoples – who have long been ” fellow victims” of Western colonialism. That Arab-Muslim writers and other intellectuals attempt to make even the simplest memory of this infamy disappear, as if it had never existed, is easily understood.

      On the other hand, what is harder to grasp is the attitude of many researchers, and even of African Americans who are converting more and more to Islam. This attitude is not always healthy and is strongly influenced by a sort of self-censorship. As if evoking the slave trading past of Arab-Muslims is in some way tantamount to minimizing the transatlantic trade. (…)

  2. Bullshittt….There is only one true Father and then the rest are gods…Jesus Christ is black. and his Son..Our heavenly father has no racial type he just happen to choose Jesus from amongst us…You are an anti-christ.

    1. Post your research than. His name is not Jesus the j was invented around 15th century. You have done no research on the matter otherwise you would have known that. Jesus has no translation nor meaning in any language. His real name was yahoshua which means Yahweh’s salvation.

      Jesus was the name of the first slave ship called “Jesus of Lubeck” which sailed in 1562. Now you check the date of when they changed his name in your bible and see. Like uncle Bob says, “emancipate yourself from mental slavery.”

      1. ARAB MUSLIMS HATE BLACKS

        Ibn Khaldun on Blacks:
        The only people who accept slavery are the Negroes, owing to their low degree of humanity and proximity to the animal stage.
        Ibn Khald?n (1332–1406) was a famous Arab Muslim historiographer and historian born in present-day Tunisia, and is sometimes viewed as one of the forerunners of modern historiography, sociology and economics. He is best known for his Muqaddimah (“Prolegomena”).
        That will put Louis Farrakhan to bed!

        Steve Cokely said, Jesse Jackson played the Judas Goat on MLK & walked him to his death!

        Al Sharpton is an FBI informant:
        AL SHARPTON’S SECRET WORK AS FBI INFORMANT
        Untold story of how activist once aided Mafia probes
        C1-7
        AL SHARPTON, THE FBI & THE MAFIA
        BY WILLIAM BASTONE WITH ANDREW GOLDBERG & JOSEPH JESSELLI

        CASSIUS CLAY aka MUHAMMAD ALI

        (BY RIGHT, HE SHOULD HAVE CALLED HIMSELF ABE GRADY IV)

        MUHAMMAD’S ALI’S IRISH ANCESTRY

        by Dick Eastman

        Despite America’s melting pot of nationalities, I don’t often hear of Irish ancestry when reading about Black American genealogy. However, history teaches us that many American Blacks have white, Indian, or other ancestry. Muhammad Ali’s ancestry includes Irish immigrants and freed blacks.

        An 1855 land survey of Ennis, a town in county Clare, Ireland, contains a reference to John Grady, who was renting a house in Turnpike Road in the center of the town. His rent payment was fifteen shillings a month. A few years later, his son Abe Grady immigrated to the United States.

        Also, around the year 1855, a man and a woman who were both freed slaves, originally from Liberia, purchased land in or around Duck Lick Creek, Logan, Kentucky. The two married, raised a family, and farmed the land. These free blacks went by the name, Morehead, the name of white slave owners of the area.

        Odessa Grady Clay, Cassius Clay’s mother, was the great-granddaughter of the freed slave Tom Morehead and of John Grady of Ennis, whose son Abe had emigrated from Ireland to the United States. She named her son Cassius in honor of a famous Kentucky abolitionist of that time. When he changed his name to Muhammad Ali in 1964, the famous boxer remarked,

        “Why should I keep my white slave-master’s name visible and my black ancestors invisible, unknown, unhonored?”

        You can read more about Muhammad Ali’s (Cassius Clay’s) ancestry at
        http://www.genealogy.com/famousfolks/muhammada/index.html and at

        http://www.nytimes.com/books/98/10/25/specials/ali-heritage.html.

        OBAMA:

        OBAMA’S PUPPETEERS
        DON’T BLAME THE MONKEY FOR THE TUNE HE DANCES TO, BLAME THE ORGAN-GRINDERS!
        ZBIGNIEW BRZEZINSKI (HENRY KISSINGER, GEORGE SOROS & THE TALMUDIC BANKSTERS)
        EVIL SPIRIT OF 5 PRESIDENTS & THE BIGGEST THREAT TO WORLD PEACE
        There is a man who is more dangerous to mankind than any other living person today. His name is Zbigniew Brzezinski, a CFR-member , Arch-Trilateral Commissionist, Bilderberger. He has been the evil spirit behind 5 US presidents, including Obama – and he is obsessed with but one thought: The US is to dominate a communist one world state.
        CHRISTIAN ZIONISTS:

        MOST EVANGELICAL CHRISTIANS ARE PRO-ZIONIST & BELIEVE THAT THE JEWS WERE RESTORED TO ISRAEL BY GOD IN 1948!
        “Israel is God’s chosen people, and Christians are fully aware of this fact”.???
        JESUS IN THE JEWISH TALMUD
        Many passages in the Talmudic books treat of the birth, life,
        death, and teachings of Jesus Christ. He is not always referred to by the same name, however, but is diversely called “That Man,” “A Certain One,” “The Carpenter’s Son,” “The One Who Was Hanged,” etc.
        CONCERNING THE NAMES OF JESUS
        1. The real name of Jesus in Hebrew is Jeschua Hanotsri – Jesus the Nazarene. He is called Notsri from the city of Nazareth in which he was brought up. Thus in the Talmud Christians also are called Notsrim – Nazarenes.
        Since the word Jeschua means “Savior,” the name Jesus rarely occurs in the Jewish books. It is almost always abbreviated to Jeschu ,which is maliciously taken as if it were composed of the initial letters of the three words Immach Schemo Vezikro – “May his name and memory be blotted out.”
        2. Elsewhere he is simply called Peloni – “A Certain One.” In Chagigah, 4b, we read:
        “Mary…the mother of a certain one, of whom it is related in Schabbath…” (104b)
        That this Mary is none other than the mother of Jesus will be shown later.
        3. Out of contempt, Jesus is also called Naggar bar naggar – “the carpenter son of a
        carpenter”, also Ben charsch etaim – “the son of a wood worker.”
        4. He is also called Talui – “The one who was hanged.” Rabbi Samuel, the son of Mair, in the Hilch. Akum of Maimonides, refers to the fact that it was forbidden to take part in the Christian feats of Christmas and Easter because they were celebrated on account of him who was hanged. And Rabbi Aben Ezra, in a commentary on Genes. also calls him Talui, whose image the Emperor
        Constantine reproduced on his banner. “…in the days of Constantine, who made a change of religion and placed the figure of the one who was hanged on his banner.”
        THE JEWS SAY JESUS IS IN HELL, WITH MUHAMMAD!
        THE LIFE OF JESUS
        The Talmud teaches that Jesus was illegitimate and was conceived during menstruation; that he had the soul of Esau; that he was a fool, a conjurer, a seducer; that he was crucified, buried in hell and set up as an idol ever since by his followers.
        IDOLATER
        In the Tract Sanhedrin (103a) the words of Psalm XCI, 10: “No plague shall come near thy dwelling,” are explained as follows:
        “That thou mayest never have a son or a disciple who will salt his food so much that he destroys his taste in public, like Jesus the Nazarene.”
        To salt one’s food too much or to destroy one’s taste, is proverbially said of one who corrupts his morals or dishonors himself, or who falls into heresy and idolatry and openly preaches it to others.
        SEDUCER
        In the same book Sanhedrin (107b) we read:
        “Mar said: Jesus seduced, corrupted and destroyed Israel.”
        CRUCIFIED
        Finally as punishment for his crimes and impiety, he suffered an ignominious death by being hanged on a cross on the eve of the Passover (as we have seen above).
        BURIED IN HELL
        The book Zohar, III, (282), tells us that Jesus died like a beast and was buried in that “dirt heap…where they throw the dead bodies of dogs and asses, and where the sons of Esau [the Christians] and of Ismael [the Turks], also Jesus and Mahommed, uncircumcized and unclean like dead dogs, are buried.”

    2. Also according to your bible Daniel 7:9 “I beheld till the thrones were cast down, and the ancient of days did sit . . . and the hair of his head like pure wool . . .”. Sounds like a black man too me. Have you read your own religious text?

  3. hmmmmm

    When one of my kids was in Grade One (age 6). I let him have a kiddie afro hair style.

    One day he told me his American ( white) lady teacher had touched his hair and she said he had wooly hair.

  4. One of the most amazing things about “woolly hair” is its versatility. And its ability to stay clean for long. Those with straight hair are prone to lice…..

    I feel sorry for all Black people who feel the need to apply lye-like chemicals to their hair in order to “integrate, look less threatening (imagine!), look sophisticated, beautiful, effete (black men) and what have you.

    Whats worse, is that these dangerous chemicals are made by white and asian firms. How they must laugh on their way to their corrupt banks-in limos. Also that human hair (extensions) is cut off from Indian women who offer it as sacrifice to their gods. Then dealers ship them to USA et al for Black women to stitch that stuff in their scalp. Billions of dollars Black women (and their hapless men) spend to try to have straight hair.

    Surreal. Mind boggling. Ridiculous.

    And (in my opinion) all that horse/human hair makes them look sluttish, materialistic gives them a sharp edge that is not attractive.

    Anyway, GOD IS BLACK. Fullstop.

  5. To put a NAME, LABEL, or MISNOMER TITLE to someone or something is showing ownership from its creator
    IF ALL TITLES CAN BE DEFINED IN ITS TRUE AND ORIGINAL STATE
    THE CORRECT AND common sense answer would be AND is UNDEFINED
    Being conscious and aware of whom I come from and who I am!
    NEVER could one be NEGRO, BLACK, COLORED, AFRICAN AMERICAN, OR apart of any other slave incorporated fictitious-make believe titles.
    DO YOU REALLY WANT TO BE BRANDED?
    IF YOU DO THAT’S YOUR CHOICE
    BUT NEVA CURSE OUR ANCESTORS WITH SUCH BLASPHEMY
    I.S.L.A.M. which for I means I am The Law Of My Vessel [MASTER]
    Walk only in the PATH which is guided,
    But I do not have a political religious belief or ALLIGEANCE TO ANYONE
    Peace & Blessings
    Moor/Egypt/Kemet
    Cnbeliev@gmail.com

  6. Elohim is an Hebrew/Ugaritic/Phoenician term that describes all being who exist in the non-material spiritual plane. The supreme Creator, the Eloah/Elyon of Elohim is YAHOWAH. HE brought forth from Himself His counterpart, called the WORD. The WORD has an origin; HE proceeded from the Yahowah, but with no beginning (a sort of explanatory analogy is a rock chipped off from a mountain – the stone is as old as the source). By the Word other mighty ones were made; they are called “sons of El Elyon”. YAHOWAH, by the WORD, also created every other thing that is. HE became flesh, His Name YAHUSHUA that YAH’s arm of salvation might be revealed to the world through Israel His chosen family. HalleluYahuwah for His truth!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CAPTCHA Image

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>