Origin of the Arab Race. Origin of Mustareb Race.

http://www.1902encyclopedia.com/A/ARA/arabia-24.html

Sub-Saharan Africa L lineages in Saudi Arabia account for 10% of the total. χ2 analyses showed that there is not significant regional differentiation in this Country. However, there is significant heterogeneity (p < 0.001) when all the Arabian Peninsula countries are compared. This is mainly due to the comparatively high frequency of sub-Saharan lineages in Yemen (38%) compared to Oman-Qatar (16%) and to Saudi Arabia-UAE (10%). Most probably, the higher frequencies shown in southern countries reflect their greater proximity to Africa, separated only by the Bab al Mandab strait. However, when attending to the relative contribution of the different L haplogroups, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and Yemen are highly similar for their L3 (34%), L2 (36%) and L0 (21%) frequencies whereas in Oman and UAE the bulk of L lineages belongs to L3 (72%). In this enlarged sample of Saudi Arabs, representatives of all the recently defined East African haplogroups L4 [30], L5 [33], L6 [30] and L7 [34], have been found. The only L4 Saudi haplotype belongs to the L4a1 subclade defined by 16207T/C transversion. Although it has no exact matches its most related types are found in Ethiopia [30]. Four L5 lineages have been found in Saudi Arabia but all have the same haplotype that belongs to the L5a1 subclade defined in the HVSI region by the 16355–16362 motif [30]. It has matches in Egypt and Ethiopia. L6 was found the most abundant clade in Yemen [30]. It has been now detected in Saudi Arabia but only once. This haplotype (16048-16223-16224-16243-16278 -16311) differs from all the previous L6 lineages by the presence of mutation 16243. In addition it lacks the 16362 transition that is carried by all L6 lineages from Yemen but has the ancestral 16048 mutation only absent in one Yemeni lineage [30]. This Saudi type adds L6 variability to Arabia, because until now L6 was only represented by a very abundant and a rare haplotype in Yemen. Attending to the most probable geographic origin of the sub-Saharan Africa lineages in Saudi Arabia, 33 (61%) have matches with East Africa, 7 (13%) with Central or West Africa whereas the rest 14 (26%) have not yet been found in Africa. Nevertheless, half of them belong to haplogroups with Western Africa origin and the other half to haplogroups with eastern Africa adscription [35,30]. It is supposed that the bulk of these African lineages reached the area as consequence of slave trade, but more ancient historic contacts with northeast Africa are also well documented [36,30,31].

Quote:

"Particularly, Yemen has the largest contribution of L lineages [30]. So, most probably, this area was the entrance gate of a portion of these lineages in prehistoric times, which participated in the building of the primitive Arabian population."

http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/8/45

“Old South Arabian inscriptions and graffiti are in scripts of a South Semitic type, of which Ethiopic is the only present-day”

1). Arabian peoples have been held to be related to a variety of groups, with homelands in almost all directions outside Arabia: the view that sought to visualize all Arabians as a single race has never been valid.

The oldest evidence indicates the presence of Africans in the Red Sea coastal plain, Iranians in the southeastern tip of the peninsula, and peoples of Aramaean stock in the north. The racial affinities of the ancient Yemeni peoples remain unsolved; the marked similarity of their culture to the Semitic cultures that arose in the Fertile Crescent to the north of the peninsula can be attributed to cultural spread rather than to immigration.

2).

a. In the north and centre the dominant linguistic form is Old North Arabian (subclassified into Lihyanic, Thamudic, and Safaitic); despite close connections between this group and Arabic, the latter cannot be regarded as lineally descended from it.

b. The Yemenite inscriptions are in Old South Arabian (subclassified into Minaean, Sabaean, Qatabanian, and Hadhramautic), which is a wholly independent group within the Semitic family of languages.(The Old North Arabian and Old South Arabian inscriptions and graffiti are in scripts of a South Semitic type, of which Ethiopic is the only present-day survivor; modern Arabic script is of a North Semitic type.)

http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/31568/history-of-Arabia/45964/Pre-Islamic-Arabia-to-the-7th-Century-ad

Quote:

“Particularly, Yemen has the largest contribution of L lineages [30]. So, most probably, this area was the entrance gate of a portion of these lineages in prehistoric times, which participated in the building of the primitive Arabian population.”

http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/8/45

Sorry Jamal, neglected to answer this. Arabia and the area of Palestine were considered part of the Sudan by Syrians in the early Islamic period and other originally non-Arab people. No historian of the ancient world ever referred to the ancient Arabians as “white” and in fact as Tariq Berry’s numerous quotations of early Arabic speaking authors, linguits and historians clearly show from Sryia to Central Asia, the Arabs in the time of Mohamed looked down on fair skin. Rock art and physical anthropological evidence from presIslamic Arabia also affirms the populations were essentially related to the peoples of sub-Saharan AFrica especially to the neoltichic cultures of the Sahara the Nile and the Horn.

There are still many people in the Arabian peninsula in the Central Arabian area and in the Hejaz who are dark brown and near black in appearance. And most of the people inhabiting Syria Iraq and other Arab speaking places are descendants of people who were settled amongst by tribes who were originally described as ‘dark brown” and “black in color”.

Jamal to answer the following
“Stated another way, why would the Arabian Peninsula and the continent now called Africa be perceived as two seperate and distinct places or two distinct lands? Does the land of Black people really terminate at the Red Sea? Or, do we have any evidences or testimony from K-M-T, Cush, Nuba, that they perceived the Arabian Peninsula as a foreign land and that the people living there were White or foreign. Do we have any evidences that the Red Sea was where they cut off ties and relationships with other people, perceiving themselves to be “Africans” and others beyond the current geopolitical borders of “Africa” to be something else or different than themselves.”

The ancient Syrians and Greeks did not distinguish between the horn of AFrica and the Arabian peninsula in ancient times. This is why Strabo and Diodorus say as for the inhabitants from Meroe and the Nile to the Red Sea they are Arabians not “Ethiopians”. Josephus said the people of Meroe were Sabaeans in fact. Abyssinia was considered the part of India and southern Arabia is often refered to as India Minor or Little India.

The words Hatti and Etiopi may have been brought into Africa in Nubia by the Sabaeans. The word Kush and Meluhha as is well known by those specializing in ancient histories was used for North Arabians and south Arabians in historical records of the late occupants of early Mesopotamia.

See also the Bible Came from Arabia by Kamal Salibi. I will have to find all of the references for this info soon as i don’t have anything in front of me now. But rest assured modern Arabs as portrayed in Western media are not representative biologically of ancient occupants of the area and are the result as most places in the world of intermixure of original Arabians with the native peoples of Syria, Mesopotamia, the Caucasus and Slavic countries as well as black Africans over a thousand years.

Start by learning how to read and write properly. You can barely spell simple words yet you claim knowledge of DNA science. Where did you learn DNA? From what book? Go learn to read you little lazy timourous rat before coming here to show off your ignorance.

Jahdey

If you’re willing to share, what wordpress template do you have here? I would like to know if it’s a free one.”