Doing research is fine, but you must use perception and logic, european culture is built under the tombs of their enemies. People just can´t accept it because their ancestors were proudless slaves.

Europe has also a pagan past, which is growing up fast right now.

People writes what they want to remember, and see what they want to see, and this is why oral tradition show the values of older cultures.

You mean African people should not alter their appearance with bleached skin, clean shave and bald head.

They should go dreadlocks…Rasta! Rasta honours your spiritual and physical essence.

One Love

Jahdey

“I am an anthropologist, specializing in archaic Egypt and Amazigh (Berber and Tuareg) early and modern cultures - cultures which range from the Oasis of Siwa in Egypt through Libya, Tunisia, Algeria, Morocco, the Canary islands, the Sahara Desert, Mali, Niger and Burkina-Faso. This large territory is called in our language Tamazgha, and Tamazgha is funded on millennia old traditions which are Africans while quite distinct from those of Negroid people of sub-Saharan regions.”

Jahdey Speaks:

Someone should please do a google image search on the ancient and contemporary Nigeriens, Malians, and Burkinabes to see how useless and misleading this pseudo-anthropologist or whatever he calls himself is.

The countries you just listed are peopled by your so-called negroid. Negroid moors?

Thus Essaouda, if you are really an anthropologist then this fact would be immediately obvious to you. Otherwise, I am inclined to view you as another one of those mad Aryanist antagonists who choke with apoplexy whenever they are confronted with the true extent of the historical greatness of the Black people of Africa. I suspect that you are just masquerading around afraid to reveal who you are. Even a grade 3 student knows that Mali and Burkina Faso are below the Sahara (sub-saharan) and Black! The fact that you cite them as Tamazigh (only that they are non-blacks according to your warped logic) undermines your claim to knowledge or discipline.

Anthropological liar - Essaouda.

Jahdey

What appears to confuse you is the word Black. It appears to give you a lot of angst. As such, Black African according to your definition is different from a subsaharan negroid. That meaningless term “subsaharan negroid” is a recent invention (less than 30 years of etymology) and it does not define the historical, genetic or social identity of black Africans.

The categorization and division of Black Africans by Europeans and wannabes like you was based on a racist colonial agenda of divide and rule not science or fact. That agenda was thrown out long ago following African victory over colonialism and racism.

Your Arab ass would want to claim African achievements as its own but your weak-minded attempts are trumped by the Holy Koran which describes white Arabs as the most barbaric and worthless of human groups, which by 5 century AD had achieved nothing of substance in human history. The Koran explicitly stated that the great civilizations of Arabia and North Africa were built by the ancestors of the Black nation of Africa. If your Arab ass can argue against the moral and historical authority of the Holy Koran then bring it on.

Take your anthropological colonial lessons with you next time you take a look at the statues of Massanisa, Emperor Philip
of Rome, Juba and the Libyan dynasty that ruled Eygpt. Pictures do not lie. Statues are carved in stone and your little Arab black/white ass from Saudi Arabia cannot hide the monumental works of Black Kings.

Go read up the Black Arab series on Rastalivewire, so that you will know where you are coming from and where you are headed. Go research on Dr Chiek Anta Diop of Senegal on what he has to say about the early racial and genetic makeup of North Africa. Go look at contemporary European depictions of the Moors who ruled them.

Anthropological liar!

Jahdey

Numidia was a Berber Kingdom at the time of the Roman occupation of North Africa, whose kings are depicted on coins, such as Jugurtha, Massinissa, Juba I and II…. All are very white-skinned, bearded individuals akin to the Kabyles of today.

I am an anthropologist, specializing in archaic Egypt and Amazigh (Berber and Tuareg) early and modern cultures - cultures which range from the Oasis of Siwa in Egypt through Libya, Tunisia, Algeria, Morocco, the Canary islands, the Sahara Desert, Mali, Niger and Burkina-Faso. This large territory is called in our language Tamazgha, and Tamazgha is funded on millennia old traditions which are Africans while quite distinct from those of Negroid people of sub-Saharan regions. When black-skinned people entered our territories, they began to be known as “Sudanese” (thus, Gnawa groups are descendants of Negro slaves brought in North Africa by the Arabic slave trade after the 11 th century) or Harratin, who are a group of darker skinned people attached to the Tuaregs, whose origins are the Sahara desert, but whose gene pool is apparented to the Berber one, and not to those of Negroes south of the Sahara….

For abundant readings on the matter, please read “Les Premiers Berberes” of Malika Hachid (Algeria, 2001),or “The Shining Ones” of Helene Hagan (2000) and all the Arabic essayists of the middle ages who described the people they encountered as they invaded North Africa. There is also a Ph D. thesis written by a Senegalese titled “Rome, Carthage and the Berbers” written in English that is quite good if you wish to evaluate rightly the misleading fantasies of a handful of Afro-centrists.