BLACK LIKE THE FIRST EUROPEANS
The first people of Europe were prehistoric Africans. They lived mostly in the southern parts of Europe, and created many paintings and cave art throughout the region.
Pretentious scholars struggling with their self-inflicted racist diseases attach ill-fitting names to the first peoples of Europe. They call them funny names like Neanderthals, Paleolithic men, Mesolithic or Neolithic, Cro-Magnons, Grimaldi, Aurignicians, in a desperate bid to hide the cultural and historical identity of those people.
It is generally conceded by those scholars however, that the African people were the bearers of the first substantive elements of culture into the European continent.
Many thousands of years before the rise of the current pale tribes of Europe, an Afrocoid people known as the Grimaldi people, established the Aurignacian cultures. These people were anatomically modern human beings of the West African typology. They brought the first indications of cultural thoughts and rites into Europe.
The Grimaldi were Black Africans with very little body hair, black and smooth skin; they had the facial features typical of West African forest dwellers. They had kinky hair too. They arrived in Europe 40,000 to 50,000 years ago.
They ranged in height from tall to medium. Their culture had developed in Africa tens of thousands of years before they moved to Europe. It was called the Arugnician Culture. In 1994, scientists found corroborating evidence of stone and bone tools on the banks of the Semlike River in Zaire. They were finely crafted tools made between 75,000 to 100,000 years old long before modern humans migrated to Europe.
The Neanderthals non-modern human specie of man had left Africa early in time (80,000 years ago) and settled in central and southern Europe. It is speculated by bio-anthropologists that the genes of those Neanderthals are extensively sown in the modern European tribes of today.
The “Cro-Magnon,” people, late contemporaries and perhaps descendants of the Grimaldi people also existed in Central and Southern Europe many thousands of years after the Grimaldi Negroid had expanded to Europe but before the appearance of the pale version of Europe now known as Caucasians.
Actually, Caucasians as a race did not appear in Europe until about twenty to thirty thousand years after the arrival of the first Africans who by this very fact are the aboriginals of Europe.
WHENCE COMETH THE PALE ONE
There are many theories which seek to explain the reason for the switch in skin color of the Europeans. The theories proposed range from the Ice-Age effect theory, to those of miscegenation and others that suggest malnutrition. In all these theories lies the admission that the pale skin is a relatively recent genetic modification that occurred in originally Black Europe.
One of the more interesting propositions suggest that the change from black to pale Europe occurred as a result of miscegenation between the modern Africans arrivals in Europe and the primordial Neanderthal which had originally come from Africa. It should be noted that the primordial human Neanderthal (physiologically and intellectually) said to be among the ancestors of Europeans and Caucasians, also came from Africa to Europe about 80,000 years ago. Thus, the Neanderthal, which had apparently been forced to Eurpe from out of Africa, was also of the African genotype.
Some theories suggest that Neanderthals (who were originally black as all original Africans) later became pale-skinned and retained excessive body hair due to genetic selection responding to the need to adapt to the cold and darkness of Ice-Age Europe.
The modern day Europeans are the products of interbreeding between these mutated pale skin Neanderthals (i.e. mutated non modern-human Africa) and the later arriving modern black Africans of 40,000 -10,000 years ago i.e. the Grimaldis.
Warm blooded animals undergo de-pigmentation in the absence of light and warmth. If there were no Ice Age in Europe, the people would have remained Negroid/Black. Some of the darkest Africoid peoples still exist as the Australian Aborigines and Tasmanians. Their ancestors left Africa in the same waves as the Africans that went to Europe. It appears that of the anatomically modern human Africans who had migrated around the globe, those in the warmer southern climates retained their African pigmentation and those in the Northern climates lost theirs as a result of miscegenation with the pale skinned Neanderthals, who it should not be forgotten were originally of the African continent.
Ogu Eji Ofor Annu,
April 1, 2006
MOOR 360 you need help
Greetings In The Name Of The Most High Jah RasTafari.
In rasponse to MOOR 360 The I is feeling you.InI agree with 99% of what you have said.The trod of Iknowledge and Overstanding is not an easy one but the “TRUTH shall Set You Free” You can take a horse to water but you cant mek it Drink .InI see this thread more a battle for superiority rather than revealing the wisdom and Iknowledge that we have learned along in InI n all I life’s journey some times the truth hurts and people will react with the ignorance of their mis-information so they will raspond with their anger and not Iknowledge.Be Patient and continue to shine your Light, on every forum there will be more than one fanatic unsatisfied with the path life has taken them and blame Ivery Thing and ivery body we must love and embrace the Blessings of Iration and treat all of her Blessings with Raspect and care Stay Blessed SoulJah .InI Wish yuh Ivery Blessing ,Guidance and Protection the battle may just have begun.
One Love
Biblical Black Hebrew Israelites
Biblical Black Hebrew Israelites
http://templeofyah.org
Im just blown away from the knowledge and ignorance of people.
But, I&I am very pleased and agree with MOOR 360.
http://myspace.com/kentloxmith
I am not full, yet! Feed me more info!
khunter3g@yahoo.com
“M00r 360″ – where do you believe the “Arabs/Berbers/Moors” recieved their “science/mathematics etc” from? They didn’t just “appear” out of nowhere…
man a lotta peoples concept of race is just about rediculous. all u gotta do is look at peoples faces. its not rocket science. north africans(moors berbers etc. are not “black”(i guess by “Black” if your talkin ethnicly {not socially} u mean central african features and skin tone)…so does that make light skinned south africans less black? i dont get it. it dont add up. north east (horn of africa area) africans are pretty much half black half arab…just look at any eritrean somali and many sudanese…just like burmese(myanmar) fools are pretty much half indian/ half khmer…all it takes is your own 2 eyeballs and half a brain. think on it.
its like calling a korean, a thai, japanese and a cambodian “asian” u people think they look ANYTHING alike? your tripping.
same thing goes for the way most africans look. its a HUGE continent filled w MANY peoples…who see themselves as different peoples.
AND ‘White”(another completely rediculous word for like 50 different races) european tribes. u try to lump so many diverse peoples into one “white” “black” “asian” or ‘Latin” race based on just skintone and you already fell out the ignorant tree and hit every branch on the way down.
yall mostly sound like a bunch of afrocentric or eurocentric nerds choking on hater tots on both sides of this argument. grow up. honestly.
and guess what..NEWSFLASH! it doesnt even MATTER!!!..lol
none of your descendants are gonna be “white” or “black” in any sense of the way YOU see it within 4 generations anyhow
another 10 gens and everyone can calm down and be brown. u got no choice but to sit back and watch all your seeds mingle. haha..do the math.
yall can get all huffy and puffy about who did what and went were first and who enslaved who…EVERYONE HAS AT SOME POINT… but in the end we r all one to begin with and allways have been below the skin and we are well on the way to physically looking like one global peoples on the out side and WILL be in pretty much of a sneeze as far as time is concerned.
the alterior race hate/pride motives in all these posts are SO obvious…
go make a half black baby or something.
youll feel better. ill feel better.
readin this has must agravate u pinche angry race centric fools off
but it makes me giggle like im stuck on stupid.
nature allways laughs last.
oh indeed.
say it wont.
my comment is for all those well meaning blacks whom suggests that the world will be just A.O K> once we all just mix it all up to a nice golden brown.Guess what my friend ; we all ready did ; their called arabs . problem is ;they found it convenient to enslave their darker brothers some where in the not to distance pass . this whole idea about blacks that happen to have a lighter hue , and therefore feel them selfs some what superior, is in it self a sickness perpetuated by there lack of understanding the brain washing they them selfs have been subjected to. one need only to look at the arabs situation in you no where to prove my point. Never the less this web site in my opinion is not about RACE ; it is about historical correctness it is important that blacks refute the image that the powers that be have impose upon them by distorting there contribution to the world .
It is the same as if some future empire other than whites where plunder tombs of presidents then impose their own images in their place , then take credit for all the achievements. Every white would be outraged. THE only obvious thing is that blacks have been mentally sabotaged by all this misinformation. By the time a young black reach 6 grade he or she is already left to wonder where they fit in to the contribution to the world .WE seek to stop this mental abuse by correcting the lies .
The argument of Black Africa has much evidence on both sides. The existence of Black Africans in egypt is certain. If they were the origins and their influence is hard to determine. You should not speek with such athority on either side.
you need pictures
Good reasoning here, I am loving it. Thanks so much! Let the truth be told. Thank You Yahawa! for taking the blind folds of my people’s eye. Thats right, RISE UP MY PEOPLE….. HaleLuYah!
Wow…there are some seriously angry people out there. What I don’t get, and will never get, is how a person of one (ANY) color/race can cry racism and in the virtual next breath spew ignorance and hatred for all those opposite of themselves.
Where I live “white/Caucasian” is minority. However, it is nearly impossible to tell until hearing someone speak. One of my best friends in the area was thought to be Italian, sounded Puerto Rican and surprised everyone with the reality of fleeing Iran mixed about garbage in back of a truck to save her 13 year old brother from his “military requirement”.
Every race/religion/creed has its flaws along with historical aghasts, but regardless of something as frivolous as appearance, shouldn’t we ALL be contributing towards PROGRESS in this day and age??
Peace is a choice.
Erika, this is not about people being “angry” and “peace on earth good will toward men.” This is about the restoration of a history that was deliberately distorted, destroyed and suppressed for centuries by a global white power collective, which needed to justify its agenda of white domination of the planet. To convince a people to be slaves, you needed to make them believe they came from nothing. This is not about how someone looks or your friends. This is about truth. Anyone who fears it is in alliance with error. You’re not talking about real peace, because that cannot come so long as lies rule. You’re talking about acquiescence. Fear of offending. But anyone who fears to offend others for a just cause, is a copping out. Peace through respect of equality and heritage is genuine, peace through surrender of one’s identity to avoid discomfort, is cowardice.
Everything taken by Western culture and hidden in the dark shall come to light. Those that deny Africa/blackness at the head of all things shall bow on their knees when all truths are revealed. Response not to those that consider themselves skeptic and take their time on this board to spew ignorances, for they are influenced by the arrogance and greed of the west and the desire to want everything, including stolen history. Lust and greed shall gain no reward.
I have a fairly high degree of E3b1 lines in my genealogy. About 1/16th total and am proud to be of African as well as Amerindian, West Asian and Caucasian descent. From my study, it seems to be clear that the majority of matrilineage for the E3b family outside of Africa is from the J Haplogroup. In North West Africa it is from the U6a. Pesent day East Africans are typically in the L mtdna with some J among others. My questions is this: for those E3b pioneers who ventured out of Africa into the Middle East and Europe so long ago, what was the matrilineage of those males as it was subsequently lost to history with thier Semitic admixture along the maternal lines? Was it from the L Haplogroup or other?
Thanks for your opinions on this. I’m am eager to hear.
Rayman
Rasman
What a global combination of genetic profile you have there.
On your query: I think that U6 specifically U6b should be given more closer consideration in terms of the pioneer African migrants to the middle east.
However, middle east and east Africa are basically the same land. The same ancient littoral landmass, the same topography, same animals, same plants, how do you figure the humans on both sides would be different.
Read the Original Black African Arabs of Arabia series on this website.
One love
Jahdey
Thanks Jahdey;
I don’t think they are that different. My guess is that when the first of our family to finally get out of Africa left the horn they went to Yemen not to the north. It was there that the J lines were gathered. Just a note, my family line to Africa was not broken until 6 generations ago and they came through Europe (Spain and France). So even in Europe our people maintained a singular community. I’m not saying that in any way other than the fact. I don’t believe in racism or separatism coming from any direction Black or White. But there were clearly clades of Afro-Europeans presidig as distinct entities into at least the 1670s. Otherwise my line would not prove by DNA to be the same on all sides of the extended families. E3b1/J2b1. I am as equally proud to be a descendent of these brillant African pioneers from the horn as I am to be a direct descendent of the Capatin of the Huron Bear Clan among 17 other native American families. But I do get very disheartended to see lateral violence both among Africans as well as Amerindians (I am a Tribal Indain). Given our Afican history and how it spread globally, it just makes no sense to me. By the way, I look white since my mother was white. However, my father’s family looks either Black, Asian or Amerindian depending on the child (14 of them). And yes I saw some discrimination first hand but life is not always easy. We just overcome and move on.
Thank You for your response. I will read the link you have recommended.
Best Regards
Rasman
Jahdey;
Thanks for reminding me about U6b. It is a minority in it’s own right. Yes of course that lineage is also found in West Africa among some scattered other locations. I don’t know too much about it but it deserves serious consideration. I think the U6a lines may have reached the Americas long before Columbus but there is much work to be done to prove that and I try to avoid speculation. As far as I know I don’t have either of these lines but I find them very interesting nonetheless. The whole U group is interesting in that it also relates to Saami people who are very close in culture to Natie Americans. What is facinatig to me is that although all our brothers and sisters come from Africa originally, we still have these lines that did not evolve that far from their origins and are still identifiable in present African cultures. Now you got me stirred up on the U6b, I have to keep my eye out for any U6b DNA results here in America. We have some interesting and controversial U6a results already. Keep thinking and studying. Be well and keep the peace.
Best Regards
Rasman
everything is a mutation, from the apes to the first homo sapiens, etc.
race is an idea build by human. it doesn’t matter if you black, brown, white, etc. all that bulls**t is in our head. racism is also an idea by human. we are all human and nothing else matter in this case. so one world one love and hoppfully one future.
greetz
This article doesn’t go far enough. In fact it is as misleading as it accuses modern history of being, on account of its labeling original men Africans.
The name African is a Latin based word derived from Africus the indigenous Latin wind god representing a south westerly direction (in relation to Rome or Greece). Africa is merely the equivalent of Land to the South West and originally only a tiny piece of modern Tunisia was referred to by it.
To think that this word is used to describe the original inhabitants of every continent, knowing what it actually means, one must question either the competency of the writer prescribing it or his ulterior, clandestine or guarded motives.
Granted he may not be aware of the facts, he should still realize the word did not exist prior to the Grecian acquisition of the Pelasgians’ lands.
In other words, he uses this word to suggest a migration from Africa into Europe, when in fact Africa is the world’s largest human reservation.
Original men came to –no– fled to Africa from every place else.
As an alien life form in study of your ape biped ,cardon organic,one planet,form of life i am interested as to when you will comence, the spread of man beyond your solar system ,at present i am driving a taxi this anables me to observe you,i also find your sun to hot though i like tail light they remind me of my sun.i find your primitive tribe like thonghts interesting. I CAN ASSURE HIS IS NOT A JOKE. Of cause you can aways depend on any form of life to think that it is made in gods image,As a life form THAT uses light to communiate i have been forced to use this crude form digital device. Judging by the above coments i would give you about 100 years befour you destroy yourselfs.DO YOU RELISE HOW MANY LIFE FORMS IN THE COSMOS GET DRUNK ON A FRIDAY ,SATUR DAY NIGHT
Wow the majority of people that replied to this article seem to be obsessed with race. I believe in the equality of humanity but I also believe in the equal representation of all ethnic groups in history books which will most likely see in american public/private school. There should books that show the contributions & accomplishments of all people instead of the just showing the accomplishments of one group and the sadness and struggles of all groups.
Ibn Ifriki, Afrikus or Ifrikesh Tubba or the Tubba Ifrikus is a well known Himyarite king of the Sabaeans living before 1000 B.C. in the time of Joshua son of Nun in the Yemen. King Ifriki according to many writers was ruler of the Sabaeans in Yemen came across the desert of Africa giving birth to the five major tribes of Berbers, including the Hawara, Gomara Masmuda Zenata Sanhaja. He is in other traditions called Farik. From his name came that of the Pharusii chariot using Berbers mentioned by the ancient Greek writers and the name of Aphren of Josephus, Afra of Cleodemus and Ephren or Aphren of the book of Genesis (son of Midian). His descendants colonized eastern Africa and the Sahara. Among their descendants are the Beni Ifren or Ifuraces branch of the modern Tuareg, the Afar and Afariyya tribes of Ethiopia, Eritrea, Yemen Somalia, modern Hadramaut and Oman.
If it became a Latin word for southwesterly wind the AFrican and Afro-Arabian traditions explain why.
The following info from a Eurocentric weblog shows the uselessness of arguing over haplotypes and genetics without physical anthropological foundations:
“A back migration from Asia to Africa took place around 15,000 years ago, with a group of R1b1* people moving to Egypt, Sudan and spreading in different directions inside Africa to Rwanda, South Africa, Namibia, Angola, Congo, Gabon, Equatorial Guinea, Cameroon, Nigeria, Ivory Coast, Guinea-Bissau. The hotspot is Cameroon. R1b1* was observed at a frequency of up to 95% in some tribes of northern Cameroon (like the Kirdi), and about 15% nationwide. It is probably where the early R1b people first settled, then spread south and east along the coast.”
The problem a lot of people are unaware that most Cromagnon and paleolithic, mesolithic and neolithic people around the Mediteranean including in North Africa were not biologically or not closely affiliated represented by modern Europeans. 15,000 years ago the majority of people in North africa were Mechtoids and other “Cro-Magnon” type people with craniofacial traits that were strongly tropical. These people had very little direct connection to modern European peoples or those called “Eurasian in the Middle East. in fact they were closer to modern sub-Saharan Africans. This has been known for many decades by anthropologists and modern physical anthropologists using genetic based traits have basically confirmed the earlier conclusions. Thus, the study done by Brace and several other reputable physical anthropological specialists who wrote and edited the paper proving the unrelatedness of most modern Europeans with ancient pre- Bronze Age Europeans showed very strong tropical and “Negroid” traits well into the neolithic. It also concluded many Bronze Age people were apparently not closely connected genetically to modern Europeans based on 24 well-tested craniofacila traits including the Mahalonobis statistic. “The surprise is that the Neolithic peoples of Europe and their Bronze Age successors are not closely related to the modern inhabitants, although the prehistoric/modern ties are somewhat more apparent in southern Europe. It is a further surprise that the Epipalaeolithic Natufian of Israel from whom the Neolithic realm was assumed to arise has a clear link to Sub-Saharan Africa.”
However the unrelatedness of ancient stone age Europeans to modern Europeans has long been known thus we here from the following specialists earlier.
Professor Willis Boughton in 1896, The History of Ancient Peoples 334-337 “Archeologists ahave found remains of three races in Europe. Two of these are generally classes as blacks , may be known as the Constant and the Cro-Magnon Race.”
“The discoveries of abundant prehistoric remains all over Europe particularly France. These with one accord tended to show that European aborigines of the Stone age were not Mongoloid like the Lapps, after all but the exact opposite. In every detail they resembled rather the dolicocecephalic Negoes of Africa.”” William Z. Ripley, Races of Europe p. 436
“The importance of the skeleton of the Cro- Magnon type is that in stature, prognathousm and shape of the orbits they exhibit approximation to the negro type more than any other which have been found in Europe.” P. 96 in Isaac Taylor, The Origin of the Aryans, first published 1889.
And in 2005 the Brace paper asserts – “If this analysis shows nothing else it demonstrates that the oft repeated European feeling that the Cro-Magnons are ‘us’ is more a product of anthropological folklore than the result of the metric data available from the skeletal remains.” see “The Questionable contribution of the Neolithic and Bronze Age to European Craniofacial form”, Loring Brace, Noriko Seguchi‡, Conrad B. Quintyn§, Sherry C. Fox, A. Russell Nelson, Sotiris K. Manolis**, by the National Academy of Sciences, which basically shows how weak the genetic link is between modern Europeans and most ancient Europeans including pre-Bronze Age Eurasiatic, regardless of what haplotype or other dna traits went where. This is due to the prevalence of African looking people in Europe and Asia until the neolithic. Something that early specialists before pseudoanthropological musings of Coon. (And even he classified the bulk of the small “Mediterranean Neolithic people as noticeably “Negroid” in craniofacial character.)
Brace’s study found that only a couple of populations in neolithic Germany to have some connection to the modern Europeans and Middle Easterners, including the modern Gaunches and Basques, and northward Berber speakers (also mainly mesocranic and brachycephalic peoples) unlike ancient Africans and modern Africans and ancient paleolithic and most neolithic Europeans and Eurasians.
In addition, recent studies have again shown as Lepsius had in the past that ancient Egyptians had essentially tropical traits.
Thus we read in another recent article, “The raw values in Table 6 suggest that Egyptians had the “super-Negroid” body plan described by Robins (1983).. This pattern is supported by Figure 7 (a plot of population mean femoral and tibial lengths; data from Ruff, 1994), which indicates that the Egyptians generally have tropical body plans. Of the Egyptian samples, only the Badarian and Early Dynastic period populations have shorter tibiae than predicted from femoral length. Despite these differences, all samples lie relatively clustered together as compared to the other populations.” (Zakrzewski, S.R. (2003). found in “Variation in ancient Egyptian stature and body proportions”. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 121 (3): 219-229.
Finally it should understood that, just because certain haplotypes or other dna traits came to be carried by a variety of modern populations says little about where a modern population or physical type originated. What it does suggest, however, is that many modern Europeans and the affiliated modern Eurasian populations have asorbed previous non-Europoid populations that were present in European, North African and Eurasian regions. The Greeks, Kabyles and other European-like types may be a good example of this.
boy o boy you see what every one can see that the first humans were black and i agree that the black people of this world have un doubtedly been mis reprasented by some bad minded ignorant white people and i feel that this knowledge should be taught to pupils throughout the wetern community however fighting over who is right and who is wrong is crap we all have the same red blood in our veins we need to move forward as humans not black or white
wise white guy ur right peace and good things come with knowing the truth and revealingit to all and not lying as whites have doen repeatedly to oppress black and keeping them from knowing their true history
iisrael@prodigy.net
Well have anybody of you heard that GENETICLY IS IMPOSSIBLE THAT THE HUMAN RACE COME OUT OF MONKEYS.
Thise have been given in public last year. So all thise fucking family trees (from monkey to human), all thise given names to all kinf of spices betwen mankind and others are NOT TRUE.
So now we have to find our origine one more time. Geneticly we are almost the same(human, monkeys,….), we also have a lot of gens same as trees or any kind of plants, fish, …. WHY, WE ALL LIVE ON WATER PLANET, WE BREATH THE SAME AIR, so our bodies are adopted to thise conditions.
And i also dont understand some people who belives in God and they think that they came out of monkey. And in other hand that the world was created in 7 days. Which days our days on earth or God lenght of days, are they same or what they are?
About black africans in Europe, they came here long time ago true, well maybe they werent total black and they have been push out from different white tribes.
Whites has come much later buth from other directions and they comes with many waves. Long story.
History lies also true, especialy old white history. I am white to, but who cares about colour if the person is good.